J
What the heck? This is absolutely BS. The exact opposite has been happening in Spider-Man. You won't let him change so he never grows, as a character or otherwise. He's been a twentysomething manchild for ages and ages now, a novice and idiotic n00b hero who stops in the middle of a fight to read a book. People like Iron Man and Wolverine should be looking up to him, not the other way around. Years after having proven himself as a man and as a hero, and he still lets people walk all over him. It utterly disheartens me to hear Quesadilla praising a strategy that's been hurting the character for years.Joe Quesada said:A character can absolutely grow within his own comic while never ever actually changing...
Ultimate Spider-Man has been going on for five years and regular Spider-Man has been going on for practically half a century. There is no basis for comparison at all.Joe Quesada said:...and I think Ultimate Spider-Man has proven that. He’s been in the same grade for five years and nearly a hundred issues.
The movie has not gone on for forty years. The cartoons did not go on for forty years.Joe Quesada said:Look, I could go on and on, I have in the past and we could argue this amongst ourselves until we’re blue in the face, but let me ask you this, why is it that in every other incarnation of Spider-Man, whether it’s the movies, the cartoons, everywhere he’s represented, they always show him as single with the exception of one place, the Marvel Universe comic? A character can absolutely grow within his own comic while never ever actually changing and I thinkUltimate Spider-Man has proven that. He’s been in the same grade for five years and nearly a hundred issues.
Shut up. Just...shut up.Joe Quesada said:By the way, if he and MJ had kids that would have just compounded the problem, and Marvel dodged that bullet some time ago. But all that said, divorcing or widowing, or annulling the marriage compounds would only be worse, that would only serve to make both Peter and MJ seem even older. So while marriage for a character is not a “bad”, it can be a bad thing from a story and property management sense if the character was best suited for being single.
I know that there are people that feel that the characters need to grow and mature, but remember a character can grow and mature while not having to grow up and age
Didn't you already do this?? It was called "Spider-Girl."Joe Quesada said:So, how about this, perhaps we take that reasoning literally, how about if we started to publish stories of a late fifties Spider-Man, he has kids and perhaps grandkids? Aunt May is long in the grave and MJ is getting saggy while Peter is getting jowly and paunchy.
Curse you for being so goddamn sexy, Bermejo!Hawkeye said:
Anyone see this?
Joe Quesada said:Look, I could go on and on, I have in the past and we could argue this amongst ourselves until were blue in the face, but let me ask you this, why is it that in every other incarnation of Spider-Man, whether its the movies, the cartoons, everywhere hes represented, they always show him as single with the exception of one place, the Marvel Universe comic? A character can absolutely grow within his own comic while never ever actually changing and I thinkUltimate Spider-Man has proven that. Hes been in the same grade for five years and nearly a hundred issues.
deemar325 said:Bermejo draws a awesome DD.
deemar325 said:If Marvel was smart they'd offer him a nice DD mini.
deemar325 said:Brubaker for me, I'm worn out on Bendis.