My review from Nolanfans:
This is Refn in Valhalla Rising mode, 95 % I'd say. It is purely abstract, all style with many many silent moments, characters looking at each other I think (I'm still digesting it, got out 5 min ago) that I really like it (note the like, not love ), it is so bizarre, special, surreal. As said, it feels ethereal and dream-like, I'm still figuring out all the symbolic aspects, because there has to be a lot of those.
The score by Martinez is really good, but Drive's is better for me, and thankfully there are quite a few tracks reminiscent of Drive. The acting is fine, no standouts, I'll explain this by saying that Refn seems more interested in the visual aspect, the pure form, the surface than on the rest, he doesn't seem interested in the human element, the emotion, that's.what is lacking for me here and his movies in general.
Here, the actors don't have much to do, Gosling's Julian being a dude of few words is frustrating, it works in Drive, but not quite here, he's left gazing into infinity as an observer, he has some 20 lines overall.
Gosling doesn't have enough to do, and we don't know a lot about his character who's not as interesting as the driver in Drive by far, IMO. The actor playing Chang is good, but the characters are just statues, shells, only there to serve the form if that makes any sense. Scott Thomas is pretty good as this horrible mother, but I'm not seeing any awards potential here, its pretty one note.
Now, the Main pt of interest: the visuals. It is a work of art in this respect, it looks impossibly gorgeous, each shot is really thought out, framing is impeccable, and it helps that Refn has a taste for stillness more than once. I like Drive's visuals better though, more my style. It is incredibly violent, but it gets to the point of being too much, and unlike Drive where it served a clear purpose IMO, I just don't see it at the moment, but I have to think about it some more. I heard quite a few people whispering during the movie because I think that many were dumbfounded at what the movie really is like.
Story is very simple, its the form that matters, the atmosphere (which is pretty great), the mood. There are a couple of Driveish moments, that I liked even more because they stood out. But I'm a tad frustrated by Refn's approach, no dialogues
or barely is cool, but too much reliance on the form here.
About the fight scene teased in the trailer, it is awesome, really. Overall, I like it I think, but I wish Refn could be more "conventional", Drive style for example, to be honest, I've seen from him Valhalla Rising, Drive, and now OGF, and the Refn I really like is the one from Drive. For example, I'd have liked to see him do the remake of The Equalizer to see him on something a bit more mainstream.
Now okay, that's what makes him so special, but he is going to alienate a lot of people if he keeps making movies like this.
About the question of length, Valhalla does feel super long, this does not, it's very slow, but no as slow as Valhalla Rising.