KRYPTON INC.
Incorporated Kryptonian
- Joined
- May 23, 2013
- Messages
- 85,990
- Reaction score
- 41,579
- Points
- 103
Sad that Notre Damme has sustained so much damaged. Apparently it's not the first time it has needed to be rebuilt. Having a major cathedral with so much history on fire like that is almost like something out of a gothic horror movie or Hammer film.
At least it wasn't completely burnt down, otherwise I don't know how they would ever rebuild that.
It can be done. The cathedral of Reins was a ruin after WW1 and it was rebuilt.
Replying to my own post...yes, they're cutting through, so yes, seem to be removing itLooks like they are prepping to remove that statue (and so will probably go around and do any others remaining on those outer edges) as a crane has just dropped into frame and workers are securing it to the straps they put around the statue)
View attachment 23683
Edit: Cutting through the base of the statue?
View attachment 23685
Was it completely levelled like the World Trade Center or did it still partially exist
It seems like these days though people wouldn't build cathedrals. It almost seems too expensive and like a thing of the past. Many modern churches are just made out of pre fab materials and not stone or even wood.
It's also amazing what technology can do now to help with restorations/rebuilding of historic buildings after events like this. I'm reminded of one of our local historic buildings after a fire gutted it 9 years ago left just the outer brick walls (fire was caused by accident/negligence... a 300 watt light was left on and too close to a wooden speaker box). Granted, at about 112 years old the building was minuscule/a fraction of the scale (and age) of ND, but when the church who owned it decided to preserve what was left and turn the building into one of their temples, watching that happen seemed like an engineering feat. They re-enforced the exterior walls from the inside (can't remember if it was with concrete or something else), and then essentially put the remnants of the building on stilts as they excavated below it to create new foundation/create some basement levels to the building, before returning it to "solid ground" (Time lapse video of the construction for anyone interested [here])
For Notre Dame...it's going to take a long time to restore this (I've seen some estimates at 10-15 years?) It will be interesting to watch it's progress/how they decide to go about it while (hopefully) retaining the original look (because I imagine they'll want to try to implement some modern safety measures to hopefully prevent this from happening again)
It's called a Lantern.I'm sure they'll restore it to its original look. I can't see any reason to suddenly have a completely different style. If the Statue of Liberty lost its torch, they wouldn't suddenly give it a modern flashlight.
Oh I know they'll do as much as they can... but there's also the possibility that some methods (? - I think that's the word I want) ways of doing (or trying to replicate) the original architecture might not be compatible with trying to put in some modern safety measures (of course, I could be completely and totally wrong and fully acknowledge thatI'm sure they'll restore it to its original look. I can't see any reason to suddenly have a completely different style. If the Statue of Liberty lost its torch, they wouldn't suddenly give it a modern flashlight.
At the same time though, it could've been SO much worse. I mean, while yes some was lost, the fact that any of the stained glass survived....there are statues within that survived, that they were able to stop the fire from catastrophically damaging the belfries (can you imagine if any or all of those bells had come loose/fallen? The lightest I believe is just under 1 ton, the heaviest is something like 13+ tons)Seeing it from the inside really shows how much damage there was.
I was thinking this myself. All the more confident they will restore the place in time.It's actually in better condition that I expected.