Wall Street Journal: "A person familiar with the matter said NX would be a handheld-console hybrid that would be compatible with its own smartphone games."
http://www.wsj.com/articles/nintendo-swings-to-loss-1469604309
Well, there it is, I guess. It's not just a hybrid of handheld and console, but also mobile apparently.
the number is dwindling but 60M is nothing to sleep on. Its far more than the Wii U has done. The NX likely wont do as well but even if does like 40M over its lifetime, thats not bad. They are at a crossroads now. They can either
A. focus on handheld,
B. home console
C. both separately
D. An amalgam of them together.
I do think D is the best option of those 4. B is not practcal is the money and sales arent there. They could do C but another home console would surely cripple them. If they did A, they'd probably be fine but that doesnt offer anything different than what they currently have. Financially it makes more sense to do 4 bc they arent ready to completely abandon hardware
As for software, Id imagine almost everything would work across both except something like Ubisoft's Just Dance series. I dont see what would be odd about having Layton on this.
Fundamental misunderstanding of how Nintendo operates. While the profit for the Wii U was low, and it lost money in its early years, it still supplied a large stream of revenue to the company. Unlike MS and Sony, whose primary revenue making comes from software and software licensing (though both have become far more conservative with their hardware in the last outing), Nintendo's is hardware based: meaning even if they were losing money (which they did, early on from the Wii U), they still were sustained in no small part by the revenue stream it created. Of course, if they were to lose money consistently, the revenue stream would not be enough to maintain their size, which is what happened to Sega.
Actually, cutting out a device (whether handheld or home console) entirely is a very, very risky move on Nintendo's part. It basically means they have to assume that the base of one will compensate for the other. Or that software sells that it generates will be massive enough to compensate. Or that it can be sold at such a profit that even selling less than the other two would still make up for the lost revenue stream. Or a combination of all of those.
It's actually worrying, in several ways, because a move like that would mean that Nintendo should probably downsize (even if not significantly) to accommodate that lost revenue stream, but Nintendo has actually
expanded a good deal over the last few years, which is one of the reasons they had quarters in the red (not because of the sales of the Wii U, as many often said without really looking at their financials.
Of course, Nintendo has been branching off into other things with toys, licensing, etc. So maybe they expect that will offset some of the lost revenue. I'm not really sure what to think about it right now.