Doc Ock
The Spider-Totem Awakens
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2009
- Messages
- 8,853
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 58
I would say the CGI looks much better now.
Definitely! At first I was in fear but yet still felt the film looked awesome.
I would say the CGI looks much better now.
Blake Lively seems really good. I don't know why people are saying she is a terrible actress.
Certainly it will. Lower resolution video is a lot more grainier than high definition footage.
It's certainly not "Avatar" quality, but it is comparable.
Again, this will help discern the bumps and depressions on Kolowpg's face but it won't elevate the quality of his movement...
No, they are not even on the same galaxy...
the cgi looked a little dodgy in the scene where he is sitting next to lively on the balcony
only iffy shot i saw
She is lovely! Oh my god, that laughter...Blake Lively seems really good. I don't know why people are saying she is a terrible actress.
No, I was not talking about the walk. That would be stupid of me. Why would I be talking about the walk? I was talking about his facial movement, body language (pre sun-walk), and compatibility in relation to Ryan Reynolds - I don't buy that he is occupying the same space as him.If you are judging the CGI on the scene where Kilowog is walking towards Jordan after creating a miniature sun, then you are mistaken. The reason why he is walking so funny is because he himself is trying to resist the gravitational pull as he is walking. that is the only scene where he is moving (walking) and it is pretty accurate. I can't think of any other scenes where there were quality issues with the character's movement.
Actually they are. You can make a comparison between the two styles (you just did). Sure, "Avatar" is superior, but considering the fact that less money and production time (in days) was spent on Green Lantern, you got a very good picture to present to audiences.
Me neither.I wouldn't be surprised if it didn't get a nomination for an Academy Award for cinematography.