Patch Family Wins Lawsuit Against Baseball Bat Company

bgates87

Waiting for a train
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
1,481
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Didn't see a thread about this so sorry if there is one already.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/2009-10-29-aluminum-bat-lawsuit_N.htm
HELENA, Mont. (AP) — A jury on Wednesday found that the maker of Louisville Slugger baseball bats failed to adequately warn about the dangers the product can pose, awarding a family $850,000 for the 2003 death of their son in a baseball game.
Family awarded $850,000 in aluminum bat lawsuit
A jury on Wednesday found that the maker of Louisville Slugger baseball bats failed to adequately warn about the dangers the product can pose, awarding a family $850,000 for the 2003 death of their son in a baseball game.
The family of Brandon Patch argued that aluminum baseball bats are dangerous because they cause the baseball to travel at a greater speed. They contended that their 18-year-old son did not have enough time to react to the ball being struck before it hit him in the head while he was pitching in an American Legion baseball game in Helena in 2003.
The Lewis and Clark County District Court jury awarded a total of $850,000 in damages against Louisville,-based Hillerich & Bradsby for failure to place warnings on the product.
The teen's mother, Debbie Patch, was stunned by the verdict. The family rejoiced and cried as the verdict was read.
"We never expected it," she said. "We just hoped we could get the truth out for more people to see."
Patch said she hopes the decision will make more people aware of the dangers associated with aluminum bats and that more youth leagues will switch to using wooden bats.
"We just want to save someone else's life," Patch said.
Attorneys for Hillerich & Bradsby declined to comment. They had argued that accidents are bound to happen in baseball games and there's nothing inherently unsafe about aluminum baseball bats.
A spokesman for the legendary bat-maker said Wednesday the company did nothing wrong and the verdict "appears to be an indictment of the entire sport of baseball."
"We made a bat in accordance with the rules," Rick Redman said. "That bat was approved for play by baseball's organizing and governing organizations."
Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association's Don't Take My Bat Away Program, a sporting goods trade group, said that while Patch's death is tragic, the exact same thing could have happened with a wooden bat.
Curt Drake, one of the family's attorneys, said the jury arrived at the total by awarding $792,000 to Brandon Patch for his lost earnings and pain and suffering, an amount that goes to his estate. The family was awarded $58,000 for their pain and suffering and damages.
Judge Kathy Seeley is still considering punitive damages in the case.
In the verdict Wednesday, the jury also decided the product was not defective. Drake said that decision was not significant, since the jury found it posed a threat without an adequate warning label.
The attorney said the family's victory will not likely change the way aluminum bats are used, but that it could help give momentum to efforts calling for a switch to wood bats in youth baseball.
Metal bats came into vogue in amateur sports in the 1970s, but professional baseball still uses wood bats. Some amateur teams have decided to switch in recent years, in part due to Patch's death.
"We should go back to the way baseball is supposed to be played, the way professional baseball is played," said Debbie Patch.
Brandon Patch was pitching for the Miles City Mavericks when the ball ricocheted off his head, eventually falling behind first base after traveling as high as 50 feet in the air.
Patch went into convulsions on the field in front of a horrified crowd and died within hours from his injury.
His family's lawsuit was one of several in recent years involving aluminum bats made by Hillerich & Bradsby.
Last year, the family of a New Jersey boy who suffered brain damage after he was struck by a line drive off an aluminum Louisville Slugger bat sued the company and others, saying they should have known it was dangerous. Steven Domalewski was 12 when he was struck by the ball in 2006. His family's suit is pending in New Jersey Superior Court.
In 2002, the parents of teenage pitcher Jeremy Brett of Enid, Okla., won a jury verdict against Hillerich & Bradsby and were awarded damages. The couple filed suit after Brett was hit in the head with a ball hit off an aluminum bat made by the company, suffering severe head injuries.
I feel bad for the family but it's ridiculous that they won this lawsuit. The Jury obviously made a sympathy verdict in favor of the family. Whenever you play any sport there is the potential for a fatal injury. No one is at fault, it was just a freak accident. The bat company is not to blame, their bats were made according to league specifications. If you're going to blame the bat company for making a Bat that hits too hard, you can also blame the baseball company for making a ball that is too hard, or blame the league for not making pitchers wear helmets, or blame the batter for hitting the ball too hard. And the family probably would have won any of those cases with the Jury they had. If this keeps up soon we'll see kids in football pads hitting cotton balls with pipe cleaners.
 
People who bring in frivolous lawsuits should be jailed for wasting the court's time.
 
FINALLY THE TRUTH CAN BE REVEALED!

Baseball bats, when swung by a person, redirect the ball, often rather quickly.

I am so glad that the veil of secrecy has been lifted on this topic.
 
No. No they shouldn't.

Louisville had the chance to bring a summary judgment for not staking a claim. Either they waved that right or the judge decided the family did have a claim.

Bringing frivolous lawsuits are the right of every person and it is the judicial system's responsibility to make sure they don't make it to litigation.

Also, I might be sitting in ConLaw class right now, so I'm a bit fired up.

This is obviously the defendant's lawyer's fault. What with the inherent risk of using a bat, and using it in its correct manner, is reasonable. I am surprised by this story yes, but don't blame the family. Blame the defense council.
 
Last edited:
This is stupid.

I feel bad for the kid and the family, but they seemed too excited that they made money off of their son's death from common sense. You can still die if you get hit in the head with a ball hit from a wooden bat just as you can from a ball hit with an aluminum bat.

I agree with the thread creator.
 
No. No they shouldn't.

Louisville had the chance to bring a summary judgment for not staking a claim. Either they waved that right or the judge decided the family did have a claim.

Bringing frivolous lawsuits are the right of every person and it is the judicial system's responsibility to make sure they don't make it to legislation.

Also, I might be sitting in ConLaw class right now, so I'm a bit fired up.

This is obviously the defendant's lawyer's fault. What with the inherent risk of using a bat, and using it in its correct manner, is reasonable. I am surprised by this story yes, but don't blame the family. Blame the defense council.

This :up:
 
The whole intention of a bat is to propel a small hard object at high velocity so the fact that it is potentially dangerous is a duh. What sort of idiot needs a specific warning that a bat does what it is intended to do? You can also create a serious injury by hitting someone with a thrown ball. Are they going to require that kids playing baseball be tattooed with a warning that any ball they throw might injure someone?
 
No. No they shouldn't.

Louisville had the chance to bring a summary judgment for not staking a claim. Either they waved that right or the judge decided the family did have a claim.

Bringing frivolous lawsuits are the right of every person and it is the judicial system's responsibility to make sure they don't make it to legislation.

Also, I might be sitting in ConLaw class right now, so I'm a bit fired up.

This is obviously the defendant's lawyer's fault. What with the inherent risk of using a bat, and using it in its correct manner, is reasonable. I am surprised by this story yes, but don't blame the family. Blame the defense council.

Lawyers still count as people, do they not? Then my point still stands.
 
Lawyers still count as people, do they not? Then my point still stands.

He's saying that we should blame Louisville Slugger's lawyers for not being able to get this case throw out so hard it hits someone in the stands.
 
I feel for them for the loss of their son...but this was not the way to go about dealing with it. It's obvious this was about money, but...whatever.

Fact is...if there's no warning on the bat about the danger posed...the family may be entitled by law to this award. Which is piddling for the company. This is product liability, pure and simple, and the family, while they got a lot of money, didn't get that much. This is, at best, something of a token settlement offer.

I'm more amused by the sheer stupidity of her "This wouldn't have happened with a wooden bat" statement. Absolute nonsense. Apparently Debbie Patch is unaware that not only can wooden bats hit balls at great speeds, but that wooden bats can also splinter and be deadly in that regard.

Expect to see warnings on all bats very soon, though.

Keep your gloves up, kids.
 
Last edited:
People shouldn't have to be warned about the obvious. Coffee is hot, baseballs travel fast after being hit by a bat, and if you break your leg climbing in through my window, GOOD.

I stand by what I said, despite it not applying perfectly to this case.
 
People shouldn't, I agree, but product liability laws allow for these kinds of lawsuits.
 
It's not that simple. Definitions within the laws are broad on purpose, in order to allow coverage and applicability for different kinds of incidents. A few of them are "frivolous". Many are not.
 
People shouldn't have to be warned about the obvious. Coffee is hot, baseballs travel fast after being hit by a bat, and if you break your leg climbing in through my window, GOOD.

I stand by what I said, despite it not applying perfectly to this case.

You're missing a more subtle point in all of this. Do you know why every person in America has heard of the McDonalds coffee case? Because McDonalds wants everybody in America to know about the case Two reasons. First, now every single person drinking McDonalds coffee is more careful with it, preventing future lawsuits. Second, for the first time ever, McDonalds looks like the good guy getting picked on. You have sme whack job old lady, suing Mickey Dees for having hot coffee, and poor McDonalds forced to pay this old crazy. Sympathy for a giant corporation is unheard of, and here we are, talking about how crazy the old lady who had her privates burnt to **** is for wanting retribution from one of the largest corporations in America.

Now granted, this is not exactly the case with Louisville. They are a well known company yes, but on the evil unstoppable scale of Mickey Dees? No, of course not. And yet here they are, up against a family whose son was killed. Dead. And yet Louisville is looking like the victim here because of the crazy lawsuit. And what's going to happen because of this case? Well, it appears people still won't use wooden bats, so no threat to Louisville's sales, but all of a sudden people have a newfound sympathy for Louisville and perhaps will be even more inclined to purchase their bats. Trust me peeps, Louisville want to lose this case. It means long term profits.

People, this is America. The best part about America is that their is always someone to sue. The plaintiffs here could have easily gone after several parties, the batter, the league for allowing aluminum bats, etc. But they [wisely] went after the defendants with the deepest pockets. The defendants are more than happy to receive the press from the case and the plaintiffs, who will never have their son back, to have a slight retribution for their a loss-- a retribution far greater than the sum they would have received from pursuing litigation with other parties.
 
Considering the source of the gene pool. The kid is better off dead.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"