I won't fight you to fight you but I disagree. When you scoot across the carpet, you don't cause an electrostatic shock between your two fingers. It happens when your charged body touches an object with no net charge. Having poles on this planet is in no way the same as this situation.
I think his exposed claws (and the act of unsheathing them, the friction and kinetic energy) could create a charge in the metal. Unsheathing the other set could create a charge too, and we'd then have them acting like two poles. But we'll agree to disagree.
But, one thing is for sure. Adamantium has been shown to be vulnerable to electromagnetism, so it is not entirely indestructible - certainly not on a molecular or atomic or subatomic level. It is extremely durable on a macroscopic level, of course.
He was wearing tight white shorts in that clip I posted. Unless the blonde woman pulled them off or he cut them off then how did they disappear? It's just a minor continuity issue.
Danoyse has addressed this. It was a white sheet or towel. In the tank, it was a black restraint, not shorts. I don't think it's bad continuity, it's the editing; we didn't need to see every detail of sheets and restraints being added or removed.
It did go inside his flesh but it didn't go inside his skull. I don't remember how the bullet looked but it should have been flattened out by hitting a hard surface so it could fit beneath the flesh. It is also plausible that the flesh started to heal around the bullet which is why we didn't see it and as it healed, it pushed the bullet out. However, that could be seen as an error as well within X2.
Well, the bullet should have ricocheted off his skull with a metallic clang, so it's an error really - but it was done for dramatic purposes so that he appeared to be shot, even dead. Just to create tension in the scene.
But, the point is that Stryker shoots two bullets inside his skull to reach his brain to erase his memories. Adamantium doesn't heal and his skull was intact in X1 with no holes. I have no idea why this movie tried to stay true to certain things and deviated so much on others. It is like they half ***ed the continuity.
It's been mentioned here that maybe the adamantium was bonded on a molecular level. Could someone live with an impervious covering of metal over their bones? I doubt it. The bones couldn't just be sealed off from the rest of the body. If the metal is bonded on a molecular level, maybe it can heal with his body?
But, regardless of this, you said earlier you weren't bothered about continuity, that you just wanted a fantastic movie and that would have stood on its own. So why is continuity an issue now?
Remember, the Wolverine 'Origins' comic book miniseries that established he definitely was born with bone claws wasn't even released at the time of the first movie.
X1 went on what was established at that time, when that movie was made 10 years ago.
The new Wolverine movie tried to take some of that now-established comic book canon and also loosely slot it in with the films. If the Wolverine movie hadn't used the Origins comic, then fans would moan, but now they have used it, movie purists like you are moaning. It's a difficult position to be in, making a movie that has the baggage of three previous films and all those comic books.
What you call half ***ed is what most sensible people would see as compromise between both worlds - the movies and the comics.
If you couldn't figure out from my post that I was joking then watch out for werewolves and werecars
!!! The guy from imdb said Wolverine's don't howl at the moon.
