SoulManX
The Inspector!
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2004
- Messages
- 11,028
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 58
Next up - the FDA will investigate Lucky Charms for their cereal's claims of being "magically delicious".
"Based on claims made on your product's label, we have determined that your Cheerios Toasted Whole Grain Oat Cereal is promoted for conditions that cause it to be a drug," the FDA said in a letter to General Mills which was posted on the federal agency's website Tuesday.
Cheerios labels claim that eating the cereal can help lower bad cholesterol, a risk factor for coronary heart disease, by four percent in six weeks.
Citing a clinical study, the product labels also claim that eating two servings a day of Cheerios helps to reduce bad cholesterol when eaten as part of a diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol, the FDA letter says.
Those claims indicate that Cheerios -- said by General Mills to be the best-selling cereal in the United States -- is intended to be used to lower cholesterol and prevent, lessen or treat the disease hypercholesterolemia, and to treat and prevent coronary heart disease.
"Because of these intended uses, the product is a drug," the FDA concluded in its letter.
I was expecting the article to be about CTC. That stuff is entirely too good. Something is up with it.This is bull. I can quit Cinnamon Toast Crunch anytime I want.
Cheerios is the best selling cereal in the states? Seriously?! Guck. It's so bland. Tastes like cardboard and milk.
Isn't that probably defeating it's whole purpose as a ''drug?"I also add some of this
Next up - the FDA will investigate Lucky Charms for their cereal's claims of being "magically delicious".
Next up - the FDA will investigate Lucky Charms for their cereal's claims of being "magically delicious".
I also add some of this
YOU JUNKIE!Honey Nut Cheerios are the best.
Why so many facepalms? Technically, the FDA is entirely correct. Then again, they're the ones who get to define what constitutes a "drug," so that isn't too surprising.
They're doing their jobs, people. I don't think that many of you realize the importance of creating and maintaining simple definitions and classifications when you're trying to regulate a myriad of products under many categorical labels. As ridiculous as this may seem, with a little careful thought it isn't difficult at all to see that this makes lots of sense.
Why am I not surprised?
I'd be interested to know what they have to say about that.Chocolate makes some women ready for lovin' so that should be considered a drug
Why so many facepalms? Technically, the FDA is entirely correct. Then again, they're the ones who get to define what constitutes a "drug," so that isn't too surprising.
They're doing their jobs, people. I don't think that many of you realize the importance of creating and maintaining simple definitions and classifications when you're trying to regulate a myriad of products under many categorical labels. As ridiculous as this may seem, with a little careful thought it isn't difficult at all to see that this makes lots of sense.