The Dark Knight Post Pictures Of Things You Really Want To See In 'The Dark Knight'

[Cinemaman]

I'm glad it's killing you. If it makes you stop misinterpreting sh1t all the time, I hope it happens soon.

I don't need you to explain why Nolan chose the Tumbler. I damn well know what it is.

Point is, you thought I was dissing the car. I just proved to you that I didn't. Blame your ass for not reading. Don't make it seem as if you're an angel in this, telling me crap like "I'm trying to understand you". Last I checked you started this by telling ultimatefan I'm basically thick-headed, and then rolling your eyes at me like a know-it-all when I tried to explain myself. There is no argument here. You spoke too soon, and I called your BS. Admit you were wrong in your assumptions, and drop it. That's all, no big deal.

Sigh.

Oh, god, you are really strange guy.

You said that you liked both Tumbler and Batmobile, right?

But before this, you said something like Tumbler was nothing for Burton's version.

Thats what I couldn't understand.

But you make it look like you are the smartest in this forum, while I just wanted to get answer on my question.

You made another argue.

I doubt there is anybody, who can talk with you, because you always want to show how smart you are.

P.S. I said this to ultimatefan, because it was my advice to him

Anyway, give me a break.

 

[E-Mack]

But before this, you said something like Tumbler was nothing for Burton's version.

No. I mentioned nothing about the Tumbler and it being in Burton's version. Where the hell are you reading this??

I doubt there is anybody, who can talk with you, because you always want to show how smart you are.

There you go again. If you actually bothered to read some of my arguments with others, you'd see I'm actually quite respectful to others, and very civil w/ my discussions. That's not the case here because it's frustrating as hell when I've got to explain everything to you.

 

[Artos]

New one.

 

[E-Mack]

^^ Who's that as Dent?

 

[Mr. Vice]

^^ Who's that as Dent?

I think that's Phillipe.

 

[The-Dark-Knight]

New one.

i was getting used to the idea of phillippe as dent but seeing that manip (no disrespect to the manip) he just looks out of place, which brings me back to.....

PHEONIX DAMMIT

 

[Cinemaman]

No. I mentioned nothing about the Tumbler and it being in Burton's version. Where the hell are you reading this??




There you go again. If you actually bothered to read some of my arguments with others, you'd see I'm actually quite respectful to others, and very civil w/ my discussions. That's not the case here because it's frustrating as hell when I've got to explain everything to you.

Uhhh...
There was one your post, where you said "who would've called that design stupid if that's what Nolan used..." And I mean next: it just sounds like you said that Tumbler was worser than batmobile, only because it looks so. But look at Tumbler in action, it is much better than batmobile IMO.

Then why are you talking with me so? Oh, I got it, you just think that I am another dumb poster, who can't argue?

 

[E-Mack]

Uhhh...
There was one your post, where you said "who would've called that design stupid if that's what Nolan used..." And I mean next: it just sounds like you said that Tumbler was worser than batmobile, only because it looks so. But look at Tumbler in action, it is much better than batmobile IMO.

Honestly dude. Are you reading? I already explained it before. I was not talking about the Tumbler. Why do you insist that I'm badmouthing the Tumbler when I'm not?

Then why you are talking with me so? Oh, I got it, you just think that I am another dumb poster, who can't argue?

For the umpteenth time, because you do not read and refuse to acknowledge it.

 

[Cinemaman]

Honestly dude. Are you reading? I already explained it before. I was not talking about the Tumbler. Why do you insist that I'm badmouthing the Tumbler when I'm not?


For the umpteenth time, because you do not read and refuse to acknowledge it.

So if I say that I am agreed with you in some another argue, you'll start respecting me?

 

[E-Mack]

So if I say that I am agreed with you in some another argue, you'll start respecting me?

I don't need people to agree with me for respect. All I ask is that you read, and at least think before you write something down.

I've already shown that you were wrong about your assumptions, so the least you could do is admit you misread my post.

 

[kenellard]

oh my god, dumbest argument ever

 

[Cinemaman]

oh my god, dumbest argument ever

Is this post adressed to me?

 

[E-Mack]

oh my god, dumbest argument ever

....and you actually read it.

LOL

 

[The Sage]

....and you actually read it.

BURNED....

 

[Cinemaman]

I don't need people to agree with me for respect. All I ask is that you read, and at least think before you write something down.

I've already shown that you were wrong about your assumptions, so the least you could do is admit you misread my post.

Ummm... Ok lets take it another way.

Just imagine what if Nolan made BB with part of Burton's stuff ala SR, what would happen?

People always need something fresh, something like Nolan showed.

He changed everything in this franchise and took it on new high level.

What if he made BB as requel to Burton's movie?

This wouldn't work.

Yes, Burton made very good Batman movies with amazing vissual style and excellent cast.

But he forgot about one thing - script.

He made good movie, but not good adaptation. There is a difference.

He made his Batman movie as Batman-Joker movie with not telling how Bruce has become the dark knight.

Nolan used another strategy. He was trying to make good movie and enough good and faithful adaptation. And thats what most of fans wanted to see on big screen.

He explained everything and showed that there couldn't be unnecessary storylines or characters.

As what about vissual style. Thats another question. I can't say Nolan's vision felt better than Burton's. But I also can't say the same about Burton's.

All I can say is that I loved both styles, which felt different from each other.

And the same I can say about vision on batmobile.


P.S. I think I can't feel my fingers

 

[The Sage]

P.S. I think I can't feel my fingers

Giving yourself a stranger, buddy?

 

[E-Mack]

All I can say is that I loved both styles, which felt different from each other.

And the same I can say about vision on batmobile.

That's wonderful.

But I hope you realize that's what I've been saying all along, while you were trying to make me look like a Nolan hater.

 

[Cinemaman]

That's wonderful.

But I hope you realize that's what I've been saying all along, while you were trying to make me look like a Nolan hater.

Realized.

 

[jtsteward]

I am only asking for one thing at Wayne Manor. The grandfather clock.

 

[The Sage]

I am only asking for one thing at Wayne Manor. The grandfather clock.

Darn straight.

 

[E-Mack]

Something tells me we won't see it.

In the first film, an elevator was used to get down to the cave. With the Grandfather clock, it usually means a door to the stairs that lead down.

Seems like a downgrade, no?

 

[jtsteward]

Something tells me we won't see it.

In the first film, an elevator was used to get down to the cave. With the Grandfather clock, it usually means a door to the stairs that lead down.

Seems like a downgrade, no?

There can still be an elevator. It can be hid by the clock.

 

[The Batman]

No Grandfather clock! It doesent fit nolans universe!

 

[E-Mack]

There can still be an elevator. It can be hid by the clock.

True. They can change it up a bit, make the clock a secret door that leads to an elevator-type hall.

 

[The Sage]

Something tells me we won't see it.

In the first film, an elevator was used to get down to the cave. With the Grandfather clock, it usually means a door to the stairs that lead down.

Seems like a downgrade, no?

Bah. Why don't just have the Grandfather clock conceal the entrance to the elevator?