AICN did an interview with Edgerton about his new movie The Square but managed to ask him questions about The Thing prequel. Here's what he said:
I’m a massive fan of the original movie. I’m doing this interview with you in a room that has a framed original THE THING one sheet on the wall, so I have to bring it up. From my understanding you are playing kind of a heroic character in this one, right? So it’s a little bit of a change of pace from the recent run of THE SQUARE and ANIMAL KINGDOM and all of this stuff.
Joel Edgerton: Yeah. Well basically what I like to do is mix it up. God, I feel like I’m the luckiest guy in the world to be starring in a remake of THE THING and I’ve got just as much kind of nerves for approaching the part as you guys could imagine and you guys would, because I’m such a huge fan of the original movie, or Carpenter’s film. I haven’t seen the other film.
I think what’s going on here is a really cool take and I think what Matthijs [Van Heijningen Jr.] and the guys who scripted it and Universal has done is a really cool idea; rather than doing a remake to do a prequel of sorts that is going to tell the story of what happened to the Norwegian base.
The story is pretty original and I think what I can tell you that the design is really kind of true to the original.
In the production offices here at Toronto they brought some on set photos, behind the scenes photos from the Carpenter film because… I don’t know if you know that when they shot the original, they had the American base built and then they built off the back of it the Norwegian base.
Joel Edgerton: You never saw the back of the American base in the film. So they actually built the two sets back to back. I think what’s going to be cool for the fans of the original film is that you are going to see the pieces of the puzzle come together that simply created the mystery in Carpenter’s film, you know, like the action and gore and the guy who slit his own throat with the cutthroat razor and all of that stuff. This film will stand-alone as it’s own entity, but it will also be a cool thing for anyone who loved the Carpenter film. “Oh, that’s how that happened!” and “That’s how that happened!”
Quint: Yeah, I love the idea of being able to pepper that stuff in and as long as it’s not too winky at the camera. If you look at INDIANA JONES 4, which I just recently re-watched to see if it got any better and it hasn’t, but I love the idea of being able to actually see an action set piece in the warehouse from RAIDERS and all of that stuff, but it went too far, maybe, lingering on the Ark. What’s really important to us and I’m speaking for me obviously, but also as a fan of Carpenter’s film is that it’s just a movie that feels in the same universe. It just has to feel authentic and if they are reverential of the original, but still wanting to tell their own story, I think that’s probably the best of both worlds.
Joel Edgerton: Yeah, and I think that’s what these guys are aiming for. They are certainly not treating it lightly, but at the same time they are moving forward with their own vision and their own take on it and I think what hopefully will be the result is the best of both worlds. I don’t know, just a tribute to what’s gone and a real excellent incorporation of where movies has come to in terms of technology.
Quint: Is there still a lot of practical effects work or is it going to be mostly CG?
Joel Edgerton: It’s going to be a combination of the two, but as for the balance I’m not really sure.