Dwarf lord
Spirit in the Night
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2003
- Messages
- 8,384
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
jimmy rhoads said:He's dead. Show some respect.
Doesn't make him a good guitarist...
jimmy rhoads said:He's dead. Show some respect.
Hee hee.Dwarf lord said:Doesn't make him a good guitarist...
Dwarf lord said:Doesn't make him a good guitarist...
I'd say it's improved. His ability to play 0 notes per second is music to my ears.hippy fascist said:actually his technique has probably suffered quite a bit since
Fried Gold said:I'd say it's improved. His ability to play 0 notes per second is music to my ears.
See, Paul Simon is my favourite guitarist. Rarely spectacular, but always perfect.hippy fascist said:adam jones
jimmy page
j mascis
tony iomi
Fried Gold said:See, Paul Simon is my favourite guitarist. Rarely spectacular, but always perfect.

No, Hendrix was a show boat. More focused on HOW he could play than WHAT he could play. I can play a guitar with my teeth!!!! Or my toes!!!! I personally can play just about any Hendrix song, do I do it behind my back or with obscure parts of my anatomy? No. Why? Because thats not what guitar playing is supposed to be about. Its about the music, and thats why great songwriters/guitarists are always going to be better than great showman guitarists. I personally agree that Hendrix is overrated, and that he's the favorite of people who either haven't done enough listening to great guitarists, or whom have never tried to play guitar. I'll take EVH's solos over Hendrix's any day of the week, or John Petrucci's. How about Allen Collins, Ed King, Gary Rossington? How bout Hughie Thomasson? Ron Wood and Keith Richards? George Harrison?Cyrusbales said:Hendrix killed all along the watchtower??? What? I like hendrix's version, although Richie havens does a really good version, and so do the dilan project. Bob dilan was a good song writer, but a bad singer.
Hendrix was great because he could play all the things that other guitarists mentioned here could, but he decided to play stuff that none of them could. Can anyone make a guitar scream and practically talk? As much I love Page, Hendrix was the superior guitarist, the most superior for technique. He was a guitar playing, LSD enfused divinity.
Green Lantern said:I'll take EVH's solos over Hendrix's any day of the week, or John Petrucci's. How about Allen Collins, Ed King, Gary Rossington? How bout Hughie Thomasson? Ron Wood and Keith Richards? George Harrison?
Green Lantern said:No, Hendrix was a show boat. More focused on HOW he could play than WHAT he could play. I can play a guitar with my teeth!!!! Or my toes!!!! I personally can play just about any Hendrix song, do I do it behind my back or with obscure parts of my anatomy? No. Why? Because thats not what guitar playing is supposed to be about. Its about the music, and thats why great songwriters/guitarists are always going to be better than great showman guitarists. I personally agree that Hendrix is overrated, and that he's the favorite of people who either haven't done enough listening to great guitarists, or whom have never tried to play guitar. I'll take EVH's solos over Hendrix's any day of the week, or John Petrucci's. How about Allen Collins, Ed King, Gary Rossington? How bout Hughie Thomasson? Ron Wood and Keith Richards? George Harrison?
Oh, I'm not saying he wasn't influential. Thats undeniable. He was one of the most influential forces to ever hit rock music. But I get highly annoyed by the fact that everyone who thinks they know about music proclaim him to be the be all end all of great guitarists, when in fact he's not all that impressive. First does NOT equal best. Most influential does NOT equal the best. Nirvana is without a doubt the most influential band of the grunge era. Are they the best? Hell no. We even had that talk over at CSjaguarr said:The thing that made Hendrix so amazing was that he was the FIRST to do any of the things that he did. His composition and songwriting left something to be desired, I agree. But, he was a complete pioneer who did things with his guitar that no one had ever heard done. Ever. And, nobody from that timeframe could even come close to recreating or mimicking what he was doing. In today's day and age, he's largely unimpressive, without a doubt.
jag
Because I listed the reason I started playinghippy fascist said:How can you not include J mascis in that list? The man's the reason I started playing!![]()
Green Lantern said:Because I listed the reason I started playing![]()

Green Lantern said:Oh, I'm not saying he wasn't influential. Thats undeniable. He was one of the most influential forces to ever hit rock music. But I get highly annoyed by the fact that everyone who thinks they know about music proclaim him to be the be all end all of great guitarists, when in fact he's not all that impressive. First does NOT equal best. Most influential does NOT equal the best. Nirvana is without a doubt the most influential band of the grunge era. Are they the best? Hell no. We even had that talk over at CSAiC, Pearl Jam and Soundgarden are all a hell of a lot better than Nirvana if not as influential...
Cyrusbales said:You can play any hendrix stuff? What about his freestyle from woodstock? I've not heard anyone come close to making those sounds, not even spacey psychadelia that try to do that stuff, like van der graff generater and hawkwind. He could do things that no one else could, simple as, he's not my fav, but i think he is easily the most technically superior guitarist of all time.
hippy fascist said:Adam Jones from Tool, he does far more interesting stuff with his guitar
Why, because he messed around to get sounds that noone else had? Thats not technicallity. Technicallity is REPEATABLE. Even Hendrix himself would not be able to duplicate what he did at Woodstock. Thats showmanship, NOT technique. Eddie Van Halen has done things to get sounds that noone else had/has too. Power drill over the pickups anyone? Any of his studio recordings (not live jams, because as I already said, NOONE can even duplicate THEIR own improvisations) I can play. I can't say the same for Eddie. Seven years of playing guitar (and from what people tell me, not badly either) later, and I STILL can't nail Eruption note for note. Have I done some of my own wild 20+ minute improvisational solos in live shows? Of course. Could I do any of them again if I tried? Nope, it will always be different. Can I revisit parts of them that I liked when coming up with new material for new releases? Yup, and do frequently.Cyrusbales said:You can play any hendrix stuff? What about his freestyle from woodstock? I've not heard anyone come close to making those sounds, not even spacey psychadelia that try to do that stuff, like van der graff generater and hawkwind. He could do things that no one else could, simple as, he's not my fav, but i think he is easily the most technically superior guitarist of all time.
Green Lantern said:Oh I agree, he is highly important to music history, and for that I am grateful. It just saddens me that noone EVER thinks to mention Collins, noone ever mentions Thomasson... Noone ever mentions King. But EVERYONE will throw Hendrix into the #1 spot even if they don't know thing one about playing.
Green Lantern said:Why, because he messed around to get sounds that noone else had? Thats not technicallity. Technicallity is REPEATABLE. Even Hendrix himself would not be able to duplicate what he did at Woodstock. Thats showmanship, NOT technique. Eddie Van Halen has done things to get sounds that noone else had/has too. Power drill over the pickups anyone? Any of his studio recordings (not live jams, because as I already said, NOONE can even duplicate THEIR own improvisations) I can play. I can't say the same for Eddie. Seven years of playing guitar (and from what people tell me, not badly either) later, and I STILL can't nail Eruption note for note. Have I done some of my own wild 20+ minute improvisational solos in live shows? Of course. Could I do any of them again if I tried? Nope, it will always be different. Can I revisit parts of them that I liked when coming up with new material for new releases? Yup, and do frequently.
Heh, I was talking Ed King of Skynyrd famejaguarr said:Albert King was a goddamn blues guitar pioneer genius and SRV borrowed more than a few licks and cues from him.
Steve Vai can play anything and everything that Hendrix ever played and more, including things that I have a hard time Hendrix would have been able to play. Hendrix was also a very sloppy player from a technical perspective, but he made it work with his style.
Adam Jones is not that great of a guitarist. I like his stuff and he comes up with tasty riffs, but he's really not anything to write home about in a sea of Petrucci's, Vai's, Paul Gilbert's and Satriani's.
jag
B.B., Albert, Ed, Kerry... 
Wilhelm-Scream said:Check these interesting quotes
"Barney Kessel is definitely the best guitar player in this world, or any other world." - George Harrison
"I couldn't believe how good Jimi Hendrix was It was a really difficult thing for me to deal with, but I just had to surrender and say, 'This is fantastic.'" - Eric Clapton
"Barney Kessel is incredible. He's just amazing . . . . Nobody can play guitar like that," - John Lennon
"Jimi Hendrix was the most exciting guitarist I've ever heard." - Brian Jones - Guitar - Rolling Stones
"Musically, we're more talented than any Bob Dylan or Paul McCartney. Mick Jagger can't produce a sound. I'm the new Elvis." - Time Magazine quotes Milli Vanilli "singer" Rob Pilatus (2-27-1990)
"... you watch Jimi Hendrix literally reinvent the instrument. He was playing from somewhere else. He was really a kind of hybrid, and I can't even begin to imagine where he came from " - Steve Vai
Correction. Hendrix played all the stuff that other guitarists didn't want to play because it sounded wank.Cyrusbales said:Hendrix was great because he could play all the things that other guitarists mentioned here could, but he decided to play stuff that none of them could.