Rabbi Botches Bris, Cuts Off Baby's Penis

And as I pointed out previously, which was overlooked.

The difference is those parts are organs that once served a purpose which overtime nature dictated weren't needed anymore. It is evident in just about every animal the role that the foreskin plays - it's to protect genitalia. The foreskin is not a redundant organ that once served a purpose at some point in our evolution like the appendix, it still serves a purpose to this day and will continue to do so until nature says otherwise.
 
Foreskin serves about as much purpose as Pubic Hair.
 
Ignorance at its finest.
 
Yet another piece of evidence that shows what an incredibly disgusting procedure this is. It is both shocking and embarrassing that such activity is still practiced in a first-world nation in today's scientific + information age.

My apologies if I offended anyone, but I don't believe in holding beliefs and statements back in favor of one's emotions.

Ignorance at its finest.

This.
 
Okay, give me a definitive reason as to why foreskin is there.

So apparently learning about how humans have evolved is now akin to being a Flat-Earther. Right. :dry:



No, sticking your fingers in your ear and ignoring evidence that's right in your dry face (you should look into some lotion or something for that by the way.) that shows that maybe it's a good idea to get snipped is akin to being a Flat-Earther. :D


I swear, this isn't the first time I've come across foreskin advocates. I once had some jackass tell me the practice is part of some "Jew conspiracy to keep Christians out of heaven by mutilating their God given bodies." I'm not saying you're one of them, but that guy is totally in your corner. It damages your stance like the nut jobs in the Tea Party does to Republicans.
 
Last edited:
No, sticking your fingers in your ear and ignoring evidence that's right in your dry face (you should look into some lotion or something for that by the way.) is akin to being a Flat-Earther. :D

Joke all you want, you are the one not acknowledging that it's meant to serve a purpose. The medical evidence is generally weak in its favour, most if not all of which is preventable anyway by good hygiene. It has a function and is not redundant.
 
With one day left, this thread should be in the running for thread of the year. Anubis has me weak on every page.

:up:
 
Joke all you want, you are the one not acknowledging that it's meant to serve a purpose. The medical evidence is generally weak in its favour, most if not all of which is preventable anyway by good hygiene. It has a function and is not redundant.


But whats the purpose? To protect the tip? Cuz I think it became redundant once man invented draws.
 
Last edited:
Joke all you want, you are the one not acknowledging that it's meant to serve a purpose. The medical evidence is generally weak in its favour, most if not all of which is preventable anyway by good hygiene. It has a function and is not redundant.
And yet hundreds of millions of men who have had it removed don't seem to suffer a negative consequence from it's loss. What is the downside to its removal that makes it so vital that somehow passed over those multitudes lacking it?
 
I believe it should be the foreskin's choice whether it should be removed or not. Have any of you bickering Berthas ever considered that :argh:
 
I want to jump in as someone who likes the penis, but I'm afraid of what kind of road that will lead me down. :funny:

I mean no disrespect Anita, but you've only really been with your hubby am I correct? We need a lady whose had the chance to view a wide variety of dongs. You know, somebody that can compare and offer an opinion based on.....hands on experience if you will. :o
 
I believe it should be the foreskin's choice whether it should be removed or not. Have any of you bickering Berthas ever considered that :argh:
ZOMG you guys. :lmao:

I mean no disrespect Anita, but you've only really been with your hubby am I correct? We need a lady whose had the chance to view a wide variety of dongs. You know, somebody that can compare and offer an opinion based on.....hands on experience if you will. :o
"Really been," yes. But....I have "hands on" experience with both kinds. :o

It really doesn't matter to me either way. It's like, hey, there's a penis, I'm not gonna complain that it's there, ya know?

It's like, you guys like to go on and on about the kinds of boobs you like, but once you have a real life pair in front of you, you aren't friggin' gonna complain about it, are you? I mean, if you want to get some that night? :oldrazz:
 
That is very true.....though I'm a butt man myself.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,288
Messages
22,079,745
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"