Rate and review, Mission: Impossible 3

[Darthphere]

Just saw it, great summer action flick. The ending was alright, I dont see the complaints for it honestly. 4/5.

 

[cerealkiller182]

I thought it was kick@$$. Lots of good supporting roles. I was expecting a little more from Phillip Seymour Hoffman who didnt have an incredible amount of screentime.

Spoiler

Does anyone think it was sloppy of Luthor, a secret agent, to use Ethan's name, another secret agent, with Davian, a villain, around

 

[Cinemaman]

It was really awesome movie blockbuster, so i will give it 8 out of 10.

I think it is the best part in trilogy.

 

[roach]

I am 50/50 on the Mission Impossible series. While the first one was great flick that was ruined by a flawed ending(no way you jump off an exploding helo and land on a bullet train)....I loved the second one because it's John Woo and I love everything he does. I loved this movie. It was a summer big budget action flick that didnt treat itself as one. You really cared for the relationship between Hunt and his girlfriend...more than Cruise and Holmes.
Plus the SR trailer made it worth it

 

[Cinemaman]

What I think about the whole MI trilogy?

MI - It was good movie, 7 out of 10.
MI-2 - Bad, more action, less script. 6 out of 10.
MI-3 - The best MI film, 8 out of 10.

 

[Two-Face]

Well I seen it today and I thought it was excellent movie Tom Cruise and PSH were on great performance 8/10.

 

[Lord Blackbolt]

I think this movie might end up as the most underrated summer movie of the summer. Cause I think all the rest look like they might dissappoint....story wise

 

[Warhammer]

9/10.

I really enjoyed it, and I liked it just a little bit better than the original.
This film crushed M:I-2 (Which was the worst one to me).
Great directing, great story, great use of teamwork, great twists.
This movie was a very good way to start off the summer.

M:I:III>Mission:Impossible>M:I-2.

I didn't see the Superman Returns trailer in the theater though.

 

[Warhammer]

I think this movie might end up as the most underrated summer movie of the summer. Cause I think all the rest look like they might dissappoint....story wise

Yeah, I agree.
Also, some people will probably want action-filled movies, and this balanced action and story very well.

Better this, than some damn action movie with little plot.

 

[Kevin Roegele]

Is she paying?

Well, Two-Face is a professional escort.

 

[Kurosawa]

4/5. Awesome action, decent story, very good characters. While Cruise was clearly the main character, he didn't dominate the movie to the detriment of the other characters. Lots of fun spy stuff. I saw it in DLP, so that didn't hurt either. Hoffman was awesome in it.

 

[amazingfantasy15]

Very good movie, great action, characters worked well together. I really couldn't find anything wrong with it, nothing really groundbreaking, but very well put together. I kinda wish there was more with Keri Russell's character and definitely more of Phillip Seymour Hoffman, he was really good as a villian. The IMF double agent's plan really reminded me of 24. Overall 4/5.

 

[The Dark Defender]

One of the best popcorn flick blockbusters I've seen in a while.

I hated the first 2, and I can't stand Cruise the person(though he's got talent), but the creator of LOST helming this one gave me faith in it, and he came through.

Hoffman was an awesome villain, I cared about Hunts' team members, the locations were beautiful, amazing stunts that blow away anything and everything in the dreadful Bond films.

A a very entertaining ride all around. Easily better than the previous two.

 

[Poetic Chaos]

Maggie Q...red dress...

 

[Wimpie]

I loved the movie... 4/5

The supporting cast was excellent. Did anyone start laughing at the girlfriend's face when she and Hunt (Tom Cruise) did a quickie marriage?Her face was priceless (she looked so excitable)! Oh, and Kerri Russel was one bad ass agent - props to her!

 

[Sava]

most seem to love this, maybe it might have strong word of mouth

 

[amazingfantasy15]

I just think it's a perfect summer movie, it's over the top at times, but not too over the top. The hero's home life is nice, Ethan's fiance/wife isn't the normal nagging kind, pissed when he's "away on business". The villian is strong. It never seemed like the movie went on autopilot, the action scenes always served the plot and the agents caught crap for doing unauthorized ops. It's weird, it's a summer movie that I shouldn't have liked because it didn't do anything new and was totally based on action, but instead I was able to get completely sucked in and have a great time, long time since I was able to do that with a "typical summer popcorn" movie. There's always something been that one thing (or many things) that took me out of the experience. Maybe the lack of obvious CGI.

 

[Mentok]

Watched it again... I still have only twi minor complaints about the film.

1- The title music didnt sound as 'full' as it should have IMO.
2- The ending was too corny.

Other than that its the best damn action film I have seen in a very long time

 

[Lord Blackbolt]

Personally I think people are getting carried aways already stating it's a bomb. 48 mill is pretty damn good. It probably won't make as much as the second MI.....but...it'll make more than the first one. I think. It's strange though...the most dumb downed Bond movies always make the most money....and the most dumbed down MI movie also did too. Makes you think.

 

[TheVileOne]

Personally I think people are getting carried aways already stating it's a bomb. 48 mill is pretty damn good. It probably won't make as much as the second MI.....but...it'll make more than the first one. I think. It's strange though...the most dumb downed Bond movies always make the most money....and the most dumbed down MI movie also did too. Makes you think.

Dude for a movie like this to be released in early May and looking at its star power, its very disappointing.

 

[DACrowe]

Meh. It was what I expected. It was okay. It was a LOT better than the second one, which was steaming pile of crap.

However, this one justs was a cliche after cliche. There was ittle plot and while they were obviously using the rabbit's foot as mcguffin (as Hitchcock put it), it was not cleverly used like the NOC list in the first movie and was rather trite. The action was good but I got bored with the whole watching Tom Cruise run from explosions deal and his attempt to "have a nomral life" almost ruined is exactly like every other reluctant hero we've seen recently. Crap, it was in the Spider-Man movies. It felt like "I've been here" and since he seemed to love his job so much in the first two, it felt really forced.

Maybe if there was a complacency about it, but a worn acceptance of the disadvantages it could work (then again that is jut copying Brosnan's Bond, which the second did enough of) okay....but meh. And the ending was almost exactly like the second one.

On the bright side the action was good and Hoffman made a great villain but he was not used much. The opening scene and the bit in the trailer are the only times where he gets to really shine and the only real thing in this movie (besides no slow-mo and doves and more team action) that raises this above the second.

It was your typical summer movie that was very okay but very redundant and far and away better than the second but the first is still the only ral smart spy movie in the movie series. The third is a big dumb action movie like the second but with some gravitas brought solely from Abrhams and Hoffman.

I hope for more out of The Da Vinci Code, POTC2 and SR now.

 

[Movies205]

Dude for a movie like this to be released in early May and looking at its star power, its very disappointing.

Exactly, the key word there being "disappointing"... There's a big diff between disappointing and bomb. It's not a bomb since it'll make it's budget back... most likely but it's definately a disappointment in terms of Gross... You do not spend that kind of green on advertisements if you expect it to gross under 50 mil in the first weekend, I mean look at Poisideon. Which will probably get a similar OW, definately a much smaller PR job there. So yeah it's majorly disappointing.

 

[TheVileOne]

Exactly, the key word there being "disappointing"... There's a big diff between disappointing and bomb. It's not a bomb since it'll make it's budget back... most likely but it's definately a disappointment in terms of Gross... You do not spend that kind of green on advertisements if you expect it to gross under 50 mil in the first weekend, I mean look at Poisideon. Which will probably get a similar OW, definately a much smaller PR job there. So yeah it's majorly disappointing.

They were definitely going for a front-loaded opening weekend with this movie, and it didn't pay off.

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2006&wknd=18&p=.htm

Weekend actuals put it UNDER $48 million.

I do agree that the NOC list was used better in the first film. But we actually knew what the NOC list was. And we kinda knew what Chimera was in the second one. Though did we even see what the virus actually did to the body?

Rabbit's foot looked like it was some sort of chemical weapon judging by the biohazard symbol on it. But what were the Chinese doing with it?

I doubt the execs. over at Paramount were doing backflips today.

 

[Cinemaman]

MI3 didn't get so much opening weekend. But I think it will have legs.

 

[TheVileOne]

MI3 didn't get so much opening weekend. But I think it will have legs.

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/?sortdate=2006-05-08&p=.htm

Based on this Monday, I don't think it will.