• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Drama Resurrection AKA The Passion of the Christ 2 (Jim Caviezel/Mel Gibson)

Caviezel was 35 when he filmed Passion - close enough to Jesus’s purported age at the Crucifixion. But Caviezel is now 50. How will they address this? I guess there could be a bit of exposition on how death and resurrection takes a lot out of a person… :thf:

To be fair, we don't know the story yet. I am actually curious to see what this will end up being about.
 
Looking forward to this.

To be fair, we don't know the story yet. I am actually curious to see what this will end up being about.

Caviezel was 35 when he filmed Passion - close enough to Jesus’s purported age at the Crucifixion. But Caviezel is now 50. How will they address this? I guess there could be a bit of exposition on how death and resurrection takes a lot out of a person… :thf:

I think I read it's going to be called "Resurrection" and deals with the days that Jesus was in the tomb until he was raised on the third day. So it's kind of set between the burial and the very last scene of Passion of the Christ where we see him emerge from the tomb.

So I don't think age is going to be a problem, because he will be more "battle damaged" anyway which could easily hide his age.

EDIT: Those new articles confirmed it's about the resurrection.

They are seriously doing this.... :funny:

This is not exactly news. This has been in the works at least for the past couple of years. Gibson and Caviezel have been talking about it at least since 2016. People are posting as if it's the first time they've heard of this. This thread could easily have been started 2 years ago.
 
Last edited:
The Bible cinematic universe is off to a great start. I heard Russel Crowe's Noah is going to make a cameo.
 
That article is compelling enough evidence to confirm the title. Change incoming!
 
That article is compelling enough evidence to confirm the title. Change incoming!

Thanks!

Could we get Jim Caviezel's name corrected in the title too please. :funny:

It currently says "Cavaziel". All these years of "Person of Interest" and people are still getting it wrong. :hehe:


Kinda surprised Cavaziel WANTS to play Christ again. The first time he did he got struck by lightning AND actually whipped on his back. Two big red flags that maybe you shouldn't be playing that character.

:huh: It's not the second time he's playing Jesus again. This is his third time playing him.

He already provided the voice for Jesus in "The Word of Promise" dramatic audio Bible which was him voice acting alongside lots of other actors (eg Marisa Tomei, Kimberly Williams-Paisley, Lou Gosett Jr and many others).

He's also said many times that it was a privilege to go through all of that to play Jesus.
 
Last edited:
Raven is such an uppity stickler.
 
Caviezel is in this because he can't get anything else, other than some direct-to-Redbox crap.
 
Yeah I remember seeing that interview before. It's from November 2016.
 
We need diversity in this one. Black jesus or Asian Jesus. or women jesus. even better.

now on less serious side, what storyline we talking about.
 
I went to a Catholic school and remember hearing that Jesus “descended into Hell” after he died. I don’t remember why. So the movie could be about Jesus literally going through hell.
 
I assume it will be about the Resurrection and the 40 days he ministered before ascending to heaven. There might be a Roman plot dealing with the disappearance of Jesus corpse. Just to gove it some tension.
 
From what I remember he came out of his tomb on Easter Sunday and later ascended to heaven. But I googled it and this is the answer I found.
Question: "Did Jesus go to hell between His death and resurrection?"

Answer: There is a great deal of confusion in regards to this question. The concept that Jesus went to hell after His death on the cross comes primarily from the Apostles’ Creed, which states, “He descended into hell.” There are also a few Scriptures which, depending on how they are translated, describe Jesus going to “hell.” In studying this issue, it is important to first understand what the Bible teaches about the realm of the dead.

In the Hebrew Scriptures, the word used to describe the realm of the dead is sheol. It simply means “the place of the dead” or “the place of departed souls/spirits.” The New Testament Greek equivalent of sheol is hades, which also refers to “the place of the dead.” Other Scriptures in the New Testament indicate that sheol/hades is a temporary place, where souls are kept as they await the final resurrection and judgment. Revelation 20:11–15 gives a clear distinction between hades and the lake of fire. The lake of fire is the permanent and final place of judgment for the lost. Hades, then, is a temporary place. Many people refer to both hades and the lake of fire as “hell,” and this causes confusion. Jesus did not go to a place of torment after His death, but He did go to hades.

Sheol/hades was a realm with two divisions—a place of blessing and a place of judgment (Matthew 11:23; 16:18; Luke 10:15; 16:23; Acts 2:27–31). The abodes of the saved and the lost are both generally called “hades” in the Bible. The abode of the saved is also called “Abraham’s bosom” (KJV) or “Abraham’s side” (NIV) in Luke 16:22 and “paradise” in Luke 23:43. The abode of the unsaved is called “hell” (KJV) or “Hades” (NIV) in Luke 16:23. The abodes of the saved and the lost are separated by a “great chasm” (Luke 16:26). When Jesus died, He went to the blessed side of sheol and, from there, took the believers with Him to heaven (Ephesians 4:8–10). The judgment side of sheol/hades has remained unchanged. All unbelieving dead go there awaiting their final judgment in the future. Did Jesus go to sheol/hades? Yes, according to Ephesians 4:8–10 and 1 Peter 3:18–20.

Some of the confusion has arisen from such passages as Psalm 16:10–11 as translated in the King James Version: “For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption. . . . Thou wilt show me the path of life.” “Hell” is not a correct translation in this verse. A correct reading would be “the grave” or “sheol.” Jesus said to the thief beside Him, “Today you will be with me in paradise” (Luke 23:43); He did not say, “I will see you in hell.” Jesus’ body was in the tomb; His soul/spirit went to be with the blessed in sheol/hades. Unfortunately, in many versions of the Bible, translators are not consistent, or correct, in how they translate the Hebrew and Greek words for “sheol,” “hades,” and “hell.”

Some have the viewpoint that Jesus went to “hell” or the suffering side of sheol/hades in order to further be punished for our sins. This idea is completely unbiblical. It was the death of Jesus on the cross that sufficiently provided for our redemption. It was His shed blood that effected our own cleansing from sin (1 John 1:7–9). As He hung there on the cross, He took the sin burden of the whole human race upon Himself. He became sin for us: “God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God” (2 Corinthians 5:21). This imputation of sin helps us understand Christ’s struggle in the garden of Gethsemane with the cup of sin which would be poured out upon Him on the cross.

As Jesus neared death, He said, “It is finished” (John 19:30). His suffering in our place was completed. His soul/spirit went to hades (the place of the dead). Jesus did not go to “hell” or the suffering side of hades; He went to “Abraham’s side” or the blessed side of hades. Jesus’ suffering ended the moment He died. The payment for sin was paid. He then awaited the resurrection of His body and His return to glory in His ascension. Did Jesus go to hell? No. Did Jesus go to sheol/hades? Yes.
 
He's also a really devout christian.

Yeah, he's spoken a lot about his experience making the first film and how it changed his life and how he was willing to make all the sacrifices in his career for it.

He's not doing this film because he can't get anything else. He's doing it because he really wants to do this sequel. He's said so before.

If it was the biggest and most personal role of his career, why wouldn't he want to reprise it if given the opportunity?

From what I remember he came out of his tomb on Easter Sunday and later ascended to heaven. But I googled it and this is the answer I found.

Yeah, it's all to do with the way words are rendered in English.

The "hell" that people usually think of if you use that word is to do with a future event - the word for that is Gehenna. The "hell" that is talked about there in the Apostle's Creed was a present and past event which represented the place of the dead. The word used there is actually "Sheol/ Hades".
 
The Chronicles of Christ: Resurrection with The Passion being retroactively changed to The Chronicles of Christ: The Passion.
 
We already know what Jesus did after the Passion..
[YT]AAAca108HfU[/YT]
 
The Chronicles of Christ: Resurrection with The Passion being retroactively changed to The Chronicles of Christ: The Passion.

The third film will be The Chronicles of Christ: The Second Coming and will be about the apocalypse. The final battle between Christ and the Devil.

Step aside star wars, hold it's beer Marvel. The true epic of our times in upon us.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"