Bad Superman
World's Grimmest Hero
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2002
- Messages
- 12,215
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Re-cut Now!!!!!!!!
Pickle-El said:my hypothesis is that they'll be rendered in 3D for IMAX, and also used as an intro for the main baddie in the Supes sequel. Thus, saving at least 10-15 million dollars that have already been spent, and giving us what looks to be a hell of a sequence.
Garzo said:Yes, and Singer will be keeping in line with his film's parallel to the original Donner film by introducing the second film's baddies at the start of the first film, or in this case, in the unseen start of the first film.
The only thing that worries me is that the threat in the sequel, whatever it is, will likely include Krypton, the New Krypton space island, and probably Superman's spacecraft buried in Smallville -- which means that Superman is inadvertantly creating the dangers that threaten Earth.
bosef982 said:Yeah, for a five to six minute scene (I think referring to it as a sequence may be a bit off), this should not have been cut at all! I'm really disappointed in Singer that he'd take something like this out. But then again, although five to six minutes in "move time" is a lot of time. Try and find a five to six minute sequence you'd cut in the movie and you'll invariably find that you're cutting two scenes. That's because most scenes are 2-3 minutes long, not five to six. In fact, this is true for most movies in general -- 2 to 3 minutes for a scene. Even the screenwriter -- with their 1 page to 1 minute ration -- is cautioned not to write a scene longer then 2 to 3 pages. The only thing that breaks this rule on screen is action sequences, which naturally tend to run longer.
Mike_D202 said:Granted it looks like a beautiful scene, but it doesnt make any sense. Krypton was blown to chunks, and that looks like more than a chunk was left...thats half a friggin' planet!
well they did cut out the entire Luthor set Superman up angle, so that big piece of the planet was than likely what the astronemers saw, and what lead Superman and the astronemers to believe that something or someone may have survived the explosion. so in a way they were right (parts of Krypton didn't blow up) and in a way they were wrong (not likely anything Kryptonian survived considering its pretty much all kryptonite now)Mike_D202 said:Granted it looks like a beautiful scene, but it doesnt make any sense. Krypton was blown to chunks, and that looks like more than a chunk was left...thats half a friggin' planet!
Mike_D202 said:Granted it looks like a beautiful scene, but it doesnt make any sense. Krypton was blown to chunks, and that looks like more than a chunk was left...thats half a friggin' planet!
AsteroidMan said:What you are missing is that in the original cut of the movie, the sun explosion was different. You never saw the planet actually exploding, and the explosion was not supposed to be a Supernova - the Supernova was written into the script and the novel, but a different theory was developed to explain what happened at a later point of the movie production which made everything plausible. Since this aspect of the movie is not in the 2006 theatrical cut, it does not matter what the theory was.
After the titles, one would have seen the ship approaching Krypton, intentionally causing confusion (wait a minute - the planet did not explode?!?), followed by the revelation the planet was not a planet but just a shard made mostly of Kryptonite.
Around the time the RK sequence was cut, the whole intro with the comics-reading child and the STM flashbacks that included the sun explosion was also cut. For a couple of months, there was no intention to show ANY sun explosion at all.
About a month before the first press screening, it was decided that the sun explosion shot should be resurrected, this time together with the planet, and that would transition into the new credit sequence. Obviously, the new sun explosion shot did not have to make sense in the context of the already cut RK sequence, just be as spectacular as possible in the 5 weeks time available... (I believe it wast
Btw, the main reason Bryan wanted the sun to explode in the first place wasn't a scientific or historical one (it did explode in STM after all) - the main reason was an artistic one. He wanted Kal El to be able to visit a place that actually LOOKS like a graveyard, so the sun had to go to allow for the right moody graveyard-like lighting of the RK sequence...
X-Maniac said:But if the sun had gone supernova (and Bryan implied it did by having no sun in the Krypton sequence to get the right lighting), then would there be anything at all left of the planet?
AsteroidMan said:It did not go supernova. It exploded in an untypical way, creating mainly a type of radiation the planetary shields of Krypton could not handle and which radiation caused the crystals in the core of the planet to turn into Kryptonite. (While not in the movie, one could picture Jor-El explaining to the Council that a newly discovered particle type would cause a global cataclism and the Elders answering - "Don't panic, we are safe behind our planetary defence")
The internal pressure of the Kryptonite conversion ultimately split the planet into pieces and those that left the shadow of the planetary shield got blasted into deep space, while others remaining where the planet used to be. The remnants of the sun created a nice-looking gas nebula...
Agreed.I wonder how that decision went down with the rest of the crew?bosef982 said:Yeah, for a five to six minute scene (I think referring to it as a sequence may be a bit off), this should not have been cut at all! I'm really disappointed in Singer that he'd take something like this out. But then again, although five to six minutes in "move time" is a lot of time. Try and find a five to six minute sequence you'd cut in the movie and you'll invariably find that you're cutting two scenes. That's because most scenes are 2-3 minutes long, not five to six. In fact, this is true for most movies in general -- 2 to 3 minutes for a scene. Even the screenwriter -- with their 1 page to 1 minute ration -- is cautioned not to write a scene longer then 2 to 3 pages. The only thing that breaks this rule on screen is action sequences, which naturally tend to run longer.
Either way, this is definitley five to six minutes I could've sit through, especially since it would've heightened the surrealism of Lex's own island, allowed Lex to be the main manipulator of him leaving, and also justified the price tag a little more to naysayers.
Either way, Singer really needs to be pressured to release this stuff. WB needs to get on him; fans need to get on him. We should see this.
And yes, I do think this is a peek at what we're getting in the sequel as to more "sci-fi"
Singer says it was his decision.wobbly said:Since we already knew the return to Krypton scenes were actually shot beyond this preliminary design work has there been any official explanation as to why they were cut? They would have added only a few minutes to the running time and would have given the film a far more impressive start to the version we saw in the theatres...and like I said before, it would have made a lot more sense to what was said later in the film (or even in the opening blurb for that matter).
Whatever the reason, I guess it's wait for the DVD's deleted scenes...or if WB are being cynical, another good few months for a 'Directors' cut (hard to believe Singer would have allowed those scenes to be cut without his permission though).
Norm3 said:Great I can't see the site. Did they close it?![]()
I saved everything. Later i'll rehost and repost them here.SolidSnakeMGS said:Dammit the site is down before I got a chance to really look at it.
Interesting stuff AsteroidMan.You certainly know a lot.AsteroidMan said:What you are missing is that in the original cut of the movie, the sun explosion was different. You never saw the planet actually exploding, and the explosion was not supposed to be a Supernova - the Supernova was written into the script and the novel, but a different theory was developed to explain what happened at a later point of the movie production which made everything plausible. Since this aspect of the movie is not in the 2006 theatrical cut, it does not matter what the theory was.
After the titles, one would have seen the ship approaching Krypton, intentionally causing confusion (wait a minute - the planet did not explode?!?), followed by the revelation the planet was not a planet but just a shard made mostly of Kryptonite.
Around the time the RK sequence was cut, the whole intro with the comics-reading child and the STM flashbacks that included the sun explosion was also cut. For a couple of months, there was no intention to show ANY sun explosion at all.
About a month before the first press screening, it was decided that the sun explosion shot should be resurrected, this time together with the planet, and that would transition into the new credit sequence. Obviously, the new sun explosion shot did not have to make sense in the context of the already cut RK sequence, just be as spectacular as possible in the 5 weeks time available... (I believe it wast
Btw, the main reason Bryan wanted the sun to explode in the first place wasn't a scientific or historical one (it did explode in STM after all) - the main reason was an artistic one. He wanted Kal El to be able to visit a place that actually LOOKS like a graveyard, so the sun had to go to allow for the right moody graveyard-like lighting of the RK sequence...