I thought I'd come here today and have a long answer fully grounded on topics to answer to, but you make it too easy. You're just looking for reasons to run from the conversation. Go ahead and be a quitter if you want, but I'm here to respond to you if you actually give me something sound, instead of name calling

loco:, dick, ********), which is the behavior of someone without an argument. I didn't call you anything, so you're the only one acting like that. Here's the conversation we had so far:
You said that you gave me ''more than one''. You gave me nothing. Point exactly where in these posts you are proving anything or where is there any shred of fact that TR won't come to the PS4. But actually give me something this time. Just your words won't make up for a solid argument.
Both are different cases and that's because Sony made it clear that it is not a timed exclusive. From the get-go. Even Phill Spencer acknowledged that. Microsoft didn't with TR.
See what I did with this reply? I explained my answer, instead of just spilling words. I can give you links too, if you prefer.
Simple, because you said my point was invalid. SFV's exclusivity with Sony was part of my argument regarding TR. When you're adressing my ''point'', you're talking about all of it, unless you clarify which part of my point you're specifically talking about. You can prove its invalidity by pointing opposite ideas to the reasons I gave you.