Take it, look at it, laught at it, throw it in the doctor's face and tell them to hurry it up.
That's what I'd do.
I want to be outraged at this - but I can't seem to.
I mean if you are going to get an abortion, aren't you already under the mind set that whatever bundle of cells you have in there isn't human life anyway? Why should a picture change that belief?
Because this law is counting on the women's hormones getting in the way of their rational thoughts. This is an attempt to stop abortion.
If a woman is so unsure with the decision that a simply picture can sway them - maybe they should think twice. I mean think of the mental anguish that could be caused by them second guessing themself AFTER they had the abortion? If this makes sure they want to go through with it, more power to them.
If a woman is so unsure with the decision that a simply picture can sway them - maybe they should think twice. I mean think of the mental anguish that could be caused by them second guessing themself AFTER they had the abortion? If this makes sure they want to go through with it, more power to them.
Do you realize how irrational women act when they're pregnant? They're nothing but hormones during that nine months. This law is taking advantage of that fact. This is one step above trying to ban abortion.
Exactly and that's the entire point of the law. Only to make those who are already having second thoughts to re-examine the issue a second time. I don't really agree with the law, but I don't think its completely pointless either.
And I've been told by several people that it only requires them to have an ultrasound, I've never heard they are forced to look at it.
Do you realize how irrational women act when they're pregnant? They're nothing but hormones during that nine months. This law is taking advantage of that fact. This is one step above trying to ban abortion.
If they're already hormonal, then chances are they've grown attached to the baby anyway.
You know what bothers me about abortions? Men go on and on about women's rights, but they don't even stop to think of theirs.
I mean, if a woman wants to abort the baby and the father would gladly raise the child on his on, it doesn't matter. Its up to the woman. I don't think that's entirely fair.
You'd be amazed how fast you bond with a baby. So if that isn't already affecting them, the picture won't either.
Bull ****, if that were true all of the neo-con groups wouldn't be running around insisting that mothers see an ultrasound of their fetus.
The man isn't the one that's going to carry the baby to term. All he did was have sex with her. I would have no say in it in my opinion.
You know what bothers me about abortions? Men go on and on about women's rights, but they don't even stop to think of theirs.
I mean, if a woman wants to abort the baby and the father would gladly raise the child on his on, it doesn't matter. Its up to the woman. I don't think that's entirely fair.
I dunno about that. I mean it really isn't fair at all, but what is the likelihood the woman would forfeit her rights as a parent and have the child raised by the father? Generally women are given precedence when it comes to child-rearing anyway, so she could change her mind when she wanted to and skip out on the dad.
That's not necessarily the case. Maybe if it was a one night stand, but even then, if the father is willing to care for the child and even pay for all the expenses, I don't see why he shouldn't be allowed that chance under reasonable circumstances.