Scream 4!!!!!

[Sawyer]

I always thought it was weird that Conway was in Scream 2 for three lines in 2 minutes and that was it...

Conway?

 

[antsman41]

Conway?

-> -> ->

Charlie Conway, the best hockey player to have ever put on a Mighty Ducks uniform...

-> -> t:

 

[KevanG]

So, when he`s unmasked what`ll his excuse be? Everyone else was doing it?

 

[antsman41]

I'd love a Scream film to not catch the killer at the end for once, put a nice twist on things...

 

[bullets]

So, when he`s unmasked what`ll his excuse be? Everyone else was doing it?

sounds plausible.

 

[KnightBat]

Thanks man and Yes i love that song too. It's a staple for these films.

I agree with you guys that both songs need to be in the new one as well as "Trouble In Woodsborro".

 

[Jennifer Walters]

Here's the thing. The killer not being caught at that end WON'T happen. Craven has said 4 is stand alone and gives no hints of another one, so therefore the killer will be unmasked at the end and killed.

 

[kickass]

I said this a few months ago so I'll repeat it now. Only because I noticed something new.

Scream 4 seems to have a heavy influence on Hitchcock.

Spoiler

Patty = Partricia is the name of Alfred Hitchcock's daughter.
Marnie = The title of a Hitchcock film.
Rebecca = Another title of a Hitchcock film. She was originally named Bette in the film, almost certain it's alluding to All About Eve with Bette Davis who play a star with a jealous assistant.

Apparently Jill and Olivia live right next door to each other and Kirby and Jill watch Olivia meet her end from Jill's bedroom window (Rear Window anyone? Another Hitchock film).

Also read the plot of Tenebre from Dario Argento. It's a bout an author on a publicity tour in Rome who finds himself targeted by a killer who's copycating the events of his latest novel. Sidney Prescott is an author in the new film and goes on a publicity tour in Woodsboro.....and now people start getting killed again.

And now I just noticed THIS :

Spoiler

Back to Rear Window. Maybe these two creepers are the killers (or one of them is and the other doesn't know) who are obsessed with recreating Hitchcock in Woodsboro.....or it could be something completely different and I'm just crazy haha.

 

[Jennifer Walters]

I doubt the killer's motives would be based on that, but it's nice to see the genuis that is Hitchcock get some loving.

Though I know a fan of Argento who would love the Tenebre connection.

 

[Homer J. Fong]

Here's the thing. The killer not being caught at that end WON'T happen. Craven has said 4 is stand alone and gives no hints of another one, so therefore the killer will be unmasked at the end and killed.

I'm sure holding off the killer's identity 'til 6 won't happen, I just want it to happen.

 

[Anjow1060]

not for nothing, it'd be really easy to have ONE of the killers un-masked and them warn of another, or a society or wtf ever could be going on.

- Jow

 

[Jennifer Walters]

I still think the partner if there is one, won't even get away. Craven said the film is a closed book at the end that can stand alone. It can't stand alone if you have the killer saying stuff like ''Well you got me, but there is still another!"

 

[chaseter]

Scream 1 was pretty good, Scream 2 was bleh, and Scream 3 was terrible. Wes Craven imo needs to stop making movies so I have no faith in this film. If I hear good things, I may check it out. Craven really needs to step his game up and I hope this film isn't being made just to give Craven some box office success after he recent dry spell of nearly a decade.

 

[Jennifer Walters]

It's not. It's a legit product of love. Craven was the LAST person alongside Neve Campbell that wanted to do another Scream film.

Also disagree about 2 and 3.

 

[The Joker]

I'm sure holding off the killer's identity 'til 6 won't happen, I just want it to happen.

Why though? Wouldn't you feel unsatisfied with such a big loose end like that not being tied up until two movies later?

 

[chaseter]

It's not. It's a legit product of love. Craven was the LAST person alongside Neve Campbell that wanted to do another Scream film.

Also disagree about 2 and 3.

Neve hasn't been in anything lately so I would think she would be more than happy to be back in a big movie.

That is fine that you love the Scream series, I grew up with them as they are one of the films that defined the 90s, but how was Scream 3 not a terrible movie in your opinion? If this film does make a profit, this will turn into the Saw series...which made itself into a terrible franchise from a good first movie with countless, unnecessary sequels. If this film is to be any good, it needs to only reference the first film and leave alone the third and second movie.

 

[Rac]

I said this a few months ago so I'll repeat it now. Only because I noticed something new.

Scream 4 seems to have a heavy influence on Hitchcock.

Spoiler

Patty = Partricia is the name of Alfred Hitchcock's daughter.
Marnie = The title of a Hitchcock film.
Rebecca = Another title of a Hitchcock film. She was originally named Bette in the film, almost certain it's alluding to All About Eve with Bette Davis who play a star with a jealous assistant.

Apparently Jill and Olivia live right next door to each other and Kirby and Jill watch Olivia meet her end from Jill's bedroom window (Rear Window anyone? Another Hitchock film).

Also read the plot of Tenebre from Dario Argento. It's a bout an author on a publicity tour in Rome who finds himself targeted by a killer who's copycating the events of his latest novel. Sidney Prescott is an author in the new film and goes on a publicity tour in Woodsboro.....and now people start getting killed again.

And now I just noticed THIS :

Spoiler

Back to Rear Window. Maybe these two creepers are the killers (or one of them is and the other doesn't know) who are obsessed with recreating Hitchcock in Woodsboro.....or it could be something completely different and I'm just crazy haha.

Nice. There's also a Vertigo poster on the classroom wall.

 

[Homer J. Fong]

Why though? Wouldn't you feel unsatisfied with such a big loose end like that not being tied up until two movies later?

Because I think it would be an additional point of interest over 4-6 to have the killer/killers' identity held off, made more of a mystery. Plus, it would be something different.

 

[amazingfantasy15]

Neve hasn't been in anything lately so I would think she would be more than happy to be back in a big movie.

That is fine that you love the Scream series, I grew up with them as they are one of the films that defined the 90s, but how was Scream 3 not a terrible movie in your opinion? If this film does make a profit, this will turn into the Saw series...which made itself into a terrible franchise from a good first movie with countless, unnecessary sequels. If this film is to be any good, it needs to only reference the first film and leave alone the third and second movie.

Yeah, she hasn't been in anything outside of the Scream franchise. Of course she's going to say it's a labor of love, but is really hoping this will get her working again.

 

[Sawyer]

Looking at her wikipedia page, she's done quite a bit since Scream 3, just nothing really major.

 

[Tex]

anyone feel that the 2 film guys are just too small to be killers? seems the way Neve faught with the other killers she would have no problem with those 2. if they are in fact the killers.

 

[Jennifer Walters]

Neve LOVES small indie films. Scream was NEVER her type of movie. So no, she's not just passing it off as a labor of love. She absolutely HATED the idea of a Scream 4.

A career is not judged based on huge tentpole/blockbuster franchises.

 

[Marx]

I know I've said it before but...Rory Culkin seriously needs a haircut.

 

[Sawyer]

Neve LOVES small indie films. Scream was NEVER her type of movie. So no, she's not just passing it off as a labor of love. She absolutely HATED the idea of a Scream 4.

A career is not judged based on huge tentpole/blockbuster franchises.

Never said it was.

I know I've said it before but...Rory Culkin seriously needs a haircut.

Painfully so.

 

[Spider-ManHero12]

The interesting thing about this new movie is that it's 10 years later........

It's not only who the killer is that needs to be shocking, but their motive.

I completely agree, and that's one of the things that'll make this film so interesting. I mean, the psoter even says it. "New Decade.New Rules." I'm just really looking foward to seeing what new things that killer has in store.