Should Kerry apologize for his comments about the troops?

[War Lord]

LOL, FACTCHECK.org
is not an opinion site.

you just failed Jonty. it wasn't even a good try.

Just because something has "fact" in it's webaddress, doesn't make it so.

 

[Mr Sparkle]

pssssst jonty. I can imagine the sheer thrilled that shot up your spine as what you typed sounded "oh, so true" within the limited confines of what passes for your brain.

but

factcheck.org is not an opinion site.
The front page contains facts about lies from both Republicans and Democrats.

much love :heart:

 

[Mr Sparkle]

Just because something has "fact" in it's webaddress, doesn't make it so.

yeah, it just so happens in this case


it is so.

you lost jonty, retire with a shred of dignity.

bah, who am I kidding? go on dude this is hilarious.t:

 

[War Lord]

pssssst jonty. I can imagine the sheer thrilled that shot up your spine as what you typed sounded "oh, so true" within the limited confines of what passes for your brain.

but

much love :heart:

It's still an opinion site, because the stories it carries are reflected of it's editorial viewpoint.

Nice try, come again.

 

[chaseter]

^I give Sparkle props for actually going out and finding articles for my question. I don't know the reliability of factcheck.org so I won't get in the middle of this.

 

[maxwell's demon]

It's still an opinion site, because the stories it carries are reflected of it's editorial viewpoint.

Nice try, come again.

Jonty. have you ever been wrong in a thread on this site? And if yes, then where? and did you admit it then?

 

[War Lord]

Jonty. have you ever been wrong in a thread on this site? And if yes, then where? and did you admit it then?

Why would I admit to having a wrong opinion?

Opinions are exactly that, opinions and opinions are never wrong because they are an individual's evaluation of a situation.

 

[Mr Sparkle]

It's still an opinion site, because the stories it carries are reflected of it's editorial viewpoint.

Nice try, come again.

LOL, no...it reflects the facts on given situations, the facts are NOT OPINIONS I know you have trouble sorting out those two (what with your continuous references to OPINIONJOURNAL which has OPINION right on the title) but yeah.

no.

 

[maxwell's demon]

Why would I admit to having a wrong opinion?

Opinions are exactly that, opinions and opinions are never wrong because they are an individual's evaluation of a situation.

ok, so i'll take that as a "no".

 

[War Lord]

LOL, no...it reflects the facts on given situations, the facts are NOT OPINIONS I know you have trouble sorting out those two (what with your continuous references to OPINIONJOURNAL which has OPINION right on the title) but yeah.

no.

What "facts" that site shares or hides from its readers is reflective of it's editorial viewpoint.

At least opinion journal admits to what it is, an opinion, whereas factcheck claims something that it cannot be, impartiality.

 

[maxwell's demon]

Why would I admit to having a wrong opinion?

Opinions are exactly that, opinions and opinions are never wrong because they are an individual's evaluation of a situation.

one more question. Are you actually Stephen Colbert?

 

[chaseter]

one more question. Are you actually Stephen Colbert?

I love Stephen Colbert and his show...hilarious.

 

[sinewave]

one more question. Are you actually Stephen Colbert?

sadly, no. stephen pretends to be an overly biased conservative with his head in the sand,......

 

[Mr Sparkle]

What "facts" that site shares or hides from its readers is reflective of it's editorial viewpoint.

At least opinion journal admits to what it is, an opinion, whereas factcheck claims something that it cannot be, impartiality.

actually, no...see this is the thing.
since you're wrong because you thought factcheck was an opinion site like the ones you like to use, you're now desperately trying to justify your idiocy.
factcheck.org has shown it's impartial archiving on the facts for a long time.
it's seriously not my problem if you where too occupied doing paste jobs on newsmax to notice.

BTW I doubt that factcheck could ever claim to be impartiality, it could try to be "impartial" but to embody the concept of impartiality.

nah.

so, again, to surmise.
you failed.

:heart:

 

[War Lord]

actually, no...see this is the thing.
since you're wrong because you thought factcheck was an opinion site like the ones you like to use, you're now desperately trying to justify your idiocy.
factcheck.org has shown it's impartial archiving on the facts for a long time.
it's seriously not my problem if you where too occupied doing paste jobs on newsmax to notice.

BTW I doubt that factcheck could ever claim to be impartiality, it could try to be "impartial" but to embody the concept of impartiality.

nah.

so, again, to surmise.
you failed.

:heart:

I paste what I believe to be true. Unfortunantly, you don't bother to really read them, but take the time to slag them, because you can't debate them.

 

[maxwell's demon]

I paste what I believe to be true. Unfortunantly, you don't bother to really read them, but take the time to slag them, because you can't debate them.

so you read all the things on factcheck?

 

[Mr Sparkle]

I paste what I believe to be true. Unfortunantly, you don't bother to really read them, but take the time to slag them, because you can't debate them.

ah, there in lies the difference, I paste WHAT IS TRUE, you paste what you believe (or more acurately would like to be) true.



LOL.


oh, I read them, and their lack of facts makes them not only HIGHLY debateable, but completely UNTRUSTWORTHY.
you think that people don't debate your rambling OPINION articles because they impenetrable walls of truth.
quite the contrary, it's not that we can't, it's that the things you believe are so mindblowingly asinine that it's NOT WORTH debating.

keep those things clear in your mind.

 

[twylight]

Mr Sparkle is ruining my :heart:



*cries*

MAKE HIM STOP!

 

[War Lord]

so you read all the things on factcheck?

Why would I waste my time reading a site that cannot be what it claims to be?

 

[KingOfDreams]

College professors I've had use factcheck.org. I think that's a pretty good endorsement right there.

 

[sinewave]

College professors I've had use factcheck.org. I think that's a pretty good endorsement right there.

they're probably abortion-loving liberal heathens.

 

[Mr Sparkle]

Mr Sparkle is ruining my :heart:

...
:heart:
...
...

 

[KingOfDreams]

they're probably abortion-loving liberal heathens.

Haha. I bet that's what Mr. War Lord is going to post.

 

[twylight]

...
:heart:
...
...

Lemon Chiffon? Please darling...

 

[maxwell's demon]

Why would I waste my time reading a site that cannot be what it claims to be?

Are you saying that only opinion matters to you? I'm just trying to clear up a few things about your worldview.

they're called Fact...Check..org. they check.....facts.....('facts' claimed by either party).

Unless....are you saying they aren't doing that?