Skyline

Holy crap, this was made for $20 million? That CG looks pretty great for a budget like that.
Some sites are saying only $10 million.
Me and the old man saw this yesterday afternoon. He liked some parts, but at the end when the credits started, he said, and I am directly quoting, "what in the hell was that?"

:hehe:
Yeah, the very end was the worst part.

It should have just ended when
Balfour and his girlfriend were pulled up to the ship, that would have been a different and decent ending. But the stuff after that inside the ship....that was just bad. My wife and I were fine with the movie except for that part.
 
A movie like this...made that inexpensively...should end up being quite profitable when all is said and done. Even if people don't go see it at a theater, alien invasion movies should be able to bring in the DVD money...
 
It made 11 mil this weekend, which is technically more than half what it cost to make.
 
The weird thing is that...this movie looks pretty much exactly like a thousand other movies...some of which went straight to SyFy, and some of which made 300 million at the box office. It's not like you are getting substantially less quality from Transmorphers...or substantially better from Transformers.
 
The aliens themselves, when you see them outside of the ships, actually don't look like bad CG at all. It can be done, but just depends on who is doing it I guess.
 
The CGI, sadly, is the best thing about this film. The ending I thought showed some promise (and has tons of story possibilities). If the directors and writers used that as the focus point of the film, that would've been interesting. But no, it's painfully stock material with heavy does of ID4, Matrix and even a bit of District 9 thrown in.

Overall, the movie looks slicker and even more polished than District 9 at a third of the budget (even though the Strause Brothers owned *hydralux, the company that did all the CGI shots in the film). Wish Skyline had half of District 9's ingenuity and creativity story-wise.
 
Yeah, the Strauss boys missed a few chapters from the District 9 Guide to Low Budget Sci-Fi Awesome.
 
Independence Day walks all over this embarrassment of a "movie".
 
No wonder...

Battle Over L.A. Alien Invasion Films
http://www.deadline.com/2010/08/battle-over-l-a-alien-invasion-films/

A real battle is brewing between rival aliens-invade-Los Angeles films Skyline and Battle: Los Angeles. Sony Pictures Entertainment, the studio behind the big budget Battle: Los Angeles, is exploring its legal options. At issue: Greg and Colin Strause, the owners of visual effects house Hydraulx, were paid millions of dollars to generate visual effects work for Battle: Los Angeles. But Hydraulx never informed SPE the siblings were directing a VFX-driven rival alien invasion feature that will hit theaters four months before SPE's March 12, 2011 release. SPE higher-ups discovered it was in a real horse race after Universal Pictures released a trailer that showed Los Angeles denizens being vacuumed into the sky by hovering space ships.

SPE lawyers have just started digging into the matter. This can be viewed as a Goliath vs. David story considering that the Strause brothers shot most of their film in an apartment, with the entire film costing a fraction of what SPE has spent for a full-scale alien battle film. But Skyline created strong buzz at Comic-Con that will give it a wide release through Relativity and Universal Pictures. Battle: Los Angeles could certainly have its thunder stolen. At issue: did Hydraulx and its owners owe SPE a heads-up?

And is SPE trying to create a legal issue with a film that can't afford it, to leverage a release date change that delays Skyline?

Hydraulx Filmz is a major VFX company for commercials and cutting-edge visual films that have included Avatar, 300, Terminator 3, The Day After Tomorrow, Constantine, X-Men: The Last Stand, and the SPE hit 2012. Hydraulx was hired by SPE in early 2009 to be one of the primary VFX vendors on Battle: Los Angeles. That gave Hydraulx access to proprietary information that included script drafts, storyboards, and pre-viz animatics. The Strause brothers had already seen the Battle: Los Angeles script, I’m told, because they were considered as potential directors.

Now, Skyline didn't exactly come out of nowhere. Deadline exclusively splashed a story in May about the film when Relativity Media acquired the picture--Brett Ratner was the catalyst and is a producer--at a time when IM Global's Stuart Ford had brokered deals for most major world territories. I reported the plot—four friends return from a night of hard partying to down L.A., slowly realize they are among a small group of survivors after most of humanity was wiped out by a deadly unknown force, and I mentioned an "extraterrestrial twist."

Sources said that SPE looked at the film at that time. But SPE legal only to delve into the conflict of interest issue after Comic-Con. One day after SPE previewed a Battle: Los Angeles trailer and introduced its cast, Universal Pictures debuted its Skyline trailer, with the Strause brothers presiding over a panel.

Making the situation even more incestuous is that Battlefield: Los Angeles is part of the slate financing deal that Ryan Kavanaugh's Relativity has with SPE, and he acquired Skyline.

Skyline will be released November 12 by Universal. I'm told the questions that SPE legal are asking include whether Hydraulx’s work on Battle: Los Angeles served as a springboard for Skyline, or gave the Strause brothers access to equipment that helped bolster the visual effects on their small budget film. SPE’s position is that at minimum, the Hydraulx principals should have disclosed their intention to make the rival project, to avoid any conflict of interest issues. Expect the legal letters to begin flying shortly.

A rep for the Strause issued a statement: "Any claims of impropriety are completely baseless. This is a blatant attempt by Sony to force these independent filmmakers to move a release date that has long been set by Universal and Relativity and is outside the filmmakers' control." SPE declined comment as did Relativity.

so basically these guys was stealing ideas from Battle: LA "allegedly" and made their own film
 
It doesn't matter, Battle:Los Angeles is gonna be the better between the two.

The only thing Skyline had going for it was the aliens themselves. Everything else was really really meh.
 
how is District 9's story so f****** awesome?. it's about a guy who could care less about these Aliens until he becomes one & learns what it is to be compassionate towards other being's. So basically a coming of age story like a million others out there. i really think people are blowing this movie way to hard. it was good for a low budget movie but it didn't break any new ground.




Steve
 
To bad Directors:Colin Strause, Greg Strause and Writers:Joshua Cordes, Liam O'Donnel
couldnt come up with a good script to go along with the pretty good FX in Skyline.
The set up is pretty weak,Terry (Donald Faison) a rapper/actor(?!?) wants his buddy
Jarrod (Eric Balfour)to move to L.A and work as a graphic artist(?!?) on his latest film/video (?!?) Jarrod's girlfriend Elaine(Scottie Thompson) already uneasy about the trip to L.A drops a bomb on him at a party and then the aliens show up.
I admit i liked the FX,and the aliens have this blue light like the blue light in electric bug zappers that attracts all types of insects,well the aliens blue light attracts people ,entrances them and zap they vanish.
The acting is terrible and silly as we watch a handful of people try to outrun the aliens.
Nothing original here,Skyline borrows from every sci fi film,from Alien to District 9.
The ending is beyond weak and laughable.This is the second movie i watched this week,that im glad i didnt pay for.
Scale of 1-10 a 4
 
how is District 9's story so f****** awesome?. it's about a guy who could care less about these Aliens until he becomes one & learns what it is to be compassionate towards other being's. So basically a coming of age story like a million others out there. i really think people are blowing this movie way to hard. it was good for a low budget movie but it didn't break any new ground.




Steve

Couple this with award winning acting, great sfx, an in-depth history of the aliens (unique ones at that), and filming in a yet unexplored Johannesberg makes this film genius at the least. If anything people underate this film IMO.

I honestly don't think it was coming of age at all. It was more anti-war oriented. It also had many undertones that had alot to do with South African politics (past & present) which was extremely smart writing. Once you analyze it you can see why it was so well received.
 
Saw this while I was on holiday last week, and while it has a couple of good action sequences for the budget, it was mainly poor, poorer than I even expected which wasnt much, I did get enjoyment out of the movie though, 5/10.
 
I left this movie thinking that Brittany Daniels filled out quite a lot. Don't know what that says about the movie, but it is my experience.
 
For a film that only cost 10 million to make I think it was a tremendous achievement. Ten million dollars is what an expensive tv pilot would cost these days and they don't look even remotely like skyline. Sure the film itself was garbage, but let's not forget what was achieved here.
 
^I think credit definately has to be given for the effects work, it was pretty much as good as most blockbusters, but the rest was just too poor for words, especially the acting.
 
Editing and music wasn't too bad either. Yeah the script was awful, but since a sequel was always intended I'll attempt to keep an open mind with regards to the potential of the story.
 
I think it's kinda..cute that the brothers were sincerely confused by the bad reviews. It shows that maybe they're great technicians but terrible storytellers.
 
Editing and music wasn't too bad either. Yeah the script was awful, but since a sequel was always intended I'll attempt to keep an open mind with regards to the potential of the story.

Actually yeah the score and editing were good, but thats about it really, it was good to watch on a Saturday night when I was bored, but I could live without seeing it again.
 
i just finish watching the movie, it wasn't bad like i thought it would be? People talkig about plotholes and such, but when you get invaded by aliens, i think the least of your worries is understanding why the aliens are there and what each thing they do means.

The ending was kool too.
 
Last edited:
I believe...no...I KNOW this is one of the worst movies ever made by a human being. There's nothing good about this flick. ****** lens flare special effects didnt look interesting, the ships were boring, the aliens were boring, the acting was beyond horrible, and the script....oh jesus.


I saw this move for free, and I wanted my money back. I hate this movie. I hate those two ******* directors, I hate how inept this movie was....

But I loved that "I'm late" exchange. That was hilarious.
 
I left this movie thinking that Brittany Daniels filled out quite a lot. Don't know what that says about the movie, but it is my experience.

seconded... she's full out BBW now.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"