The Lizard
Didn't eat Billy
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2000
- Messages
- 15,632
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
By this point, I think we've all seen the latest SHH announcement about posting links to bootleg fan-edited versions of films. I'm not questioning SHH's policy on this because it's obviously in their best interest not to do anything that upsets the studios that provide SHH with scoops and such. I totally understand their position.
However, I am wondering about the description of creating a fan-edited film as "piracy". Copying a DVD with the intent of giving it to someone else is illegal of course, even if you're not making any profit from it. However, from a purely creative standpoint, are you really guilty of "piracy" if you buy a DVD, edit it into something you like better and then show that version to friends? After all, you did pay for the DVD in the first place.
This is a similar situation to the "Cleanflicks" DVD rental company in Utah that edits out certain parts of movies on DVD so that can rent them out as more "family friendly" versions. They make a profit from that however.
However, I am wondering about the description of creating a fan-edited film as "piracy". Copying a DVD with the intent of giving it to someone else is illegal of course, even if you're not making any profit from it. However, from a purely creative standpoint, are you really guilty of "piracy" if you buy a DVD, edit it into something you like better and then show that version to friends? After all, you did pay for the DVD in the first place.
This is a similar situation to the "Cleanflicks" DVD rental company in Utah that edits out certain parts of movies on DVD so that can rent them out as more "family friendly" versions. They make a profit from that however.