• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Sony giving up on Blu-Ray ?

bluejake01 said:
That is really offensive. HD IS that damned good. It is as big a leap for home entertainment as the advent of color TV and VCR's. I work in the film industry, because of HD. We are on the cutting edge of a revolution in the way films are made...period...end of story.

People that don't get HD = Dinosaurs

Go back to your 8-track cassettes, now in stereo....you know, one speaker goes "ohm" while the other one goes "pop"
You're seriously deluded, and biased. It's not that big of a leap. HD, what's to get? It's way overpriced, and when I have watched it, it added not one ounce of enjoyment to the movie or TV show.
 
darwinwins said:
that article is stupid. blu-ray isn't going anywhere since ps3's were going for several thousands of dollars on e-bay. didn't see that occuring for microsoft.

Supply and demand, there was no where near the shortage of 360 as there is for PS3.... When it first came out...
 
bluejake01 said:
That is really offensive. HD IS that damned good. It is as big a leap for home entertainment as the advent of color TV and VCR's. I work in the film industry, because of HD. We are on the cutting edge of a revolution in the way films are made...period...end of story.

People that don't get HD = Dinosaurs

Go back to your 8-track cassettes, now in stereo....you know, one speaker goes "ohm" while the other one goes "pop"
I've watched a football game in HD. While it looked better than on my TV, I didn't see a need to see empty field on either side of the offensive line, I didn't see a reason to see more people in the stands.

It's not the second coming of a messiah.
 
Killgore said:
You're seriously deluded, and biased. It's not that big of a leap. HD, what's to get? It's way overpriced, and when I have watched it, it added not one ounce of enjoyment to the movie or TV show.


Then you are obviously blind. If you can't see the difference in color response, vibrance, contrast and definition of picture between SD and HD then you are blind, or not actually seeing an HD picture on a good HD monitor.
 
Addendum said:
I've watched a football game in HD. While it looked better than on my TV, I didn't see a need to see empty field on either side of the offensive line, I didn't see a reason to see more people in the stands.

It's not the second coming of a messiah.

I said it was a leap in home entertainment, not the Messiah.

Apply that to movies...if you could see a movie in better than theater quality at home, wouldn't that be better than watching a fuzzy 4:3 vhs on a CRT TV?
 
Alot of people who buy HDTV's think the TV is "All Set Out Of The Box" when in fact that's so far from the truth.
 
Movies205 said:
Supply and demand, there was no where near the shortage of 360 as there is for PS3.... When it first came out...

Sony releases systems way before their time.
 
Shuley said:
Alot of people who buy HDTV's think the TV is "All Set Out Of The Box" when in fact that's so far from the truth.

Too true.
 
Add... What are you going to do on Febuary 17th 2009 when ALL tv broadcasts are in HD? Stop watching TV all together? Better get used to it now.
 
Shuley said:
What are you going to do on Febuary 17th 2009 when ALL tv broadcasts are in HD? Stop watching TV all together?

There are other ways of seeing new episodes of shows that same night it airs then watching them on TV. Its not the end of the world if someone doesnt see the newest episode asap & if what your saying does happen then that wont help with shows when it comes down to ratings. The ones that dont care will just download their shows an hour later after airing. If what you say does happen ratings will die so bad it wont be laughable.
 
Shuley said:
Add... What are you going to do on Febuary 17th 2009 when ALL tv broadcasts are in HD? Stop watching TV all together? Better get used to it now.
There's nothing much worth watching on tv now, except for sports.

And since I subscribe to Sirius Satellite Radio, I don't have to rely on the occasional Bears game being shown in Memphis.

My TV is currently being used to play video games and watch DVDs. And since there are DVDs for shows I like, I won't have to bother with commercials at all.
 
bluejake01 said:
Then you are obviously blind. If you can't see the difference in color response, vibrance, contrast and definition of picture between SD and HD then you are blind, or not actually seeing an HD picture on a good HD monitor.
You're a lemming. You said that the advancement is akin to color TV or VHS. It is not. A sharper picture isn't as huge of an advancement as going from black and white to color nor is it as huge of an advent as being able to tape a program and watch it later, or having an entire catalogue of movies and entertainment opened up via VHS. I just got back from watching football at my inlaws. They bought themselves a 60" LCD HDTV for Christmas and had the HD installed yesterday. Was it a better picture? Yes. But it was the same freaking game I could watch and enjoy just as much on my 40" TV at home. They aren't enjoying the game $2000 more plus an extra $20 a month more than me. They bought it because they were convinced that they "had" to have it. It's a friggin' luxury item, not the second coming of Christ. When they come down sufficiently in price, then maybe I can justify buying one. For now, and for most Americans, it isn't worth the price tag. If you believe it is, you are buying into the consumerist mentality that is being fed to you, and by being part of the industry, you are obliged to propagate.
 
oh no! not new technology! i won't have it. color television? why that's blasphemy!
 
followed by the lame quip of someone who can't understand technology past the lamentations of popular publications of people magazine and its ilk.
 
This is America is it not? If you have such a problem with consumerism, go to Cuba or something? No need to talk down to people like you are superior. I say, get off your high horse.
 
Consumers aren't that bright though, especially mainstream consumers
 
Step out of the Matrix. You are being controlled by desires implanted by advertising.

Answer this: If you had to place a dollar amount on the extra enjoyment that you receive by watching your HDTV, what would that be?
 
Killgore said:
Step out of the Matrix. You are being controlled by desires implanted by advertising.

Answer this: If you had to place a dollar amount on the extra enjoyment that you receive by watching your HDTV, what would that be?
so you enjoy movies on only one level and it's not image. check.
 
HD is not mainstream, in my opinion. They market to a limited demographic, people with money. With any new technology, it is always very expensive right out of the gate. I remember when DVD players were going for $1000, the same as Blu-Ray Players are now. This HD upgrade is comparable to VHs going to DVD. People made the same arguments before. If you can't afford to upgrade then simply wait for the market to stablize and the prices to drop. No need to act like a snobbish iconoclast just becaue you think you are better or smarter than everyone else. No, then you are just an *******. And nobody likes an *******.
 
Then they need to get those damned HD commercials off the air then
 
Addendum said:
Then they need to get those damned HD commercials off the air then
Why?
 
Since people in the mainstream don't get the new technology. Waste of time
 
Addendum said:
Since people in the mainstream don't get the new technology. Waste of time
the early adopters already have theirs and probably keep upgrading cos they want to. the next stage is for critical mass in public awareness. it's the only way to saturate the market. jeez.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"