- Joined
- Sep 14, 2008
- Messages
- 40,446
- Reaction score
- 6,223
- Points
- 103
****, you just reminded me that MOS has alot of work to get people turned onto Superman again. By not just moving him forward, but getting people to forget SR.
I won't argue about Khan's merit's as a character, because he's a great baddie, but the fact is that he's no where NEAR the Joker in terms of general audience awareness. The general public knows the Joker. Heck, the Joker is one of the most recognizable fictional villains period. Khan is pretty much out of the public consciousness. Even if you made him the villian, it wouldn't do much for the box office draw, because the general audience doesn't remeber who he is. Not the target audience for this movie anyways.
I dont know. I think SR did one helluva job of getting people to forget SR all on its own...![]()
The key difference being that people actually liked Trek.![]()
Bringing Khan back would be a good idea, since Man of Steel is using Zod. I wonder what's up with the Star Trek sequel script, it was supposed to be finished back in March. If Paramount thinks that it's possible to get a film out next June, without pre-production, casting (I bet the main Enterprise crew cast have other commitments as well) and a completed script at this stage, they're crazy.
Dark Knight Rises has been filming for a few weeks, Spider-man is possibly at the post-production stage now, even Men in Black 3 is in production, and those films are out after the Star Trek sequel 29th June 2012 release date.
Superman vs. Star Trek?!Uh-oh.....Superman may be in trouble.
Nah. They will probably be released a good two weekends apart at the very least if anything. Heck, Trek might not even make that new date by the way things are going so far.![]()
I'm going to be seeing both of them so there is no vs to me. I'm not a huge fan of movie battle just for the sake of them.
I'm just simply stating that despite SR's boxoffice it was not as well liked as Trek. And no, I'm not saying that Trek was the best movie ever nor am I saying that it had the best word of mouth of all time. I'm simply saying that the vast majority people actually liked it and SR at best had a 50/50 split of people who liked it and the other half were either underwhelmed or disliked it.
See there was no hyperbole one way or the other in that statement, I didn't even compare SR to Hulk because the audience just outright hated that film. Nor did I compare Trek to Pirates because it's legs weren't that amazing.
I personally don't see The Man of Steel or Spider-Man reboot doing gangbusters. They could do enough to start franchises though.
Two weekends would be good. I want to see both movies and I want to see both of them do well enough to warrant sequels.
Yeah I would also. That's why I think Abrams, Orci and Kurtzman are taking a calculated risk by not adding a compelling and popular character like Khan as the main baddie for their sequel. I personally think it's a mistake. Then again, Orci and Kurtzman are not great screenwriters anyway IMO.
I definitely agree Orci and Kurtzman are great screenwriters(although didn't they write the second Transformers? I loved the first one). I would love to see the Abramsverse version of Kahn, but I also think there should be a Trek film about exploration. Which may be difficult to make interesting.
I said Orci and Kurtzman are NOT great screenwriters, at least to me. A Trek film about exploration would be nice but the ones in the past that kind of went that route were bad weren't they?
I loved Star Trek, but seriously, how can Vulcan and Earth not be able to destroy a giant mining drill from the ground? There must be some technology like air defence missiles in future, since we even have it in reality. There was no force field around that thing since Kirk and Sulu can land on it, and Spock was able to destroy it with a few phaser shots from the Jellyfish ship. Another thing that bugged me was Kirk going from cadet to captain in a day?
Did anyone question Orci and Kurtzman about this stuff before filming? But since the film was made during the writer's strike, it wouldn't have been possible to change stuff. Could be possible the reason why the script for the sequel is not finished yet is that JJ is not happy with what Orci and Kurtzman have written (isn't Damon Lindelof writing the script as well?)
My great fear in this is the comparison game. People compared Lex Luthor in Superman returns with Lex Luthor in Superman II. People compared Superman from Superman Returns to Superman From Superman II. You get people seeing Khan in a Star Trek sequel and it brings into there minds images of Ricardo Montalban and the comparison game starts all over again. Khan is one of the greatest of all star trek villians but ; and I'm saying this directly to Kirk: "you do not need to defeat him again." The wealth of adventure from the paperbacks titled star trek is almost as limitless as the old episodes. I would love to see one of them put to the big screen. "enemy mine" , 3 minute universe" , "rings of tautee" the list goes on and on.Bringing Khan back would be a good idea, since Man of Steel is using Zod. I wonder what's up with the Star Trek sequel script, it was supposed to be finished back in March. If Paramount thinks that it's possible to get a film out next June, without pre-production, casting (I bet the main Enterprise crew cast have other commitments as well) and a completed script at this stage, they're crazy.
Dark Knight Rises has been filming for a few weeks, Spider-man is possibly at the post-production stage now, even Men in Black 3 is in production, and those films are out after the Star Trek sequel 29th June 2012 release date.
I think having gotten the earth defense codes from captain pike; Nero was able to override earths ability to defend itself in that manner. Wasn't exactly conveyed very well the movie. I kept waiting to see a quick battle between nero and earth's inner defense mechanisms. Luckily for me the movie was enjoyable enough to suspend that little bit of suspension of belief.I loved Star Trek, but seriously, how can Vulcan and Earth not be able to destroy a giant mining drill from the ground? There must be some technology like air defence missiles in future, since we even have it in reality. There was no force field around that thing since Kirk and Sulu can land on it, and Spock was able to destroy it with a few phaser shots from the Jellyfish ship. Another thing that bugged me was Kirk going from cadet to captain in a day?
Did anyone question Orci and Kurtzman about this stuff before filming? But since the film was made during the writer's strike, it wouldn't have been possible to change stuff. Could be possible the reason why the script for the sequel is not finished yet is that JJ is not happy with what Orci and Kurtzman have written (isn't Damon Lindelof writing the script as well?)
Yep. It seems Orci and Kurtzman are having problems with writing a good script.