I do like lightsaber battles. The problem with the lightsaber battles in the prequel trilogy is that they don't have any substance or depth in favor of just style and flash. They were flawlessly choreographed that lacked any sense of emotion.
For example take my favorite lightsaber battle from Return of the Jedi. In Return of the Jedi, after Vader angers Luke by threatening to turn Leia to the Dark Side, Luke snaps and starts wailing on him with no sense of grace or skill, fueled by his rage. He lost all sense of composure and just pounds him into submission. What happens in The Phantom Menace after Obi-Wan witnesses Darth Maul kill Qui-Gonn? He goes backed to highly choreographed per-ordained fighting.
Or take the Empire Strikes Back where the lack of complex choreography develops a sense of the skill and emotional level both Luke and Darth Vader are at. Since Luke had very little lightsaber training, you got the sense that Luke is a total novice and is completely out of his element in going up against Vader. Meanwhile, with Darth Vader you get the feeling that he can just annihilate Luke at any moment and is just toying with him. What happens in Attack of the Clones when Anakin and Obi-Wan go up against Count Dooku, someone who is far more advanced than they are? More highly choreographed per-ordained fighting.
You see in the Original Trilogy, while the lightsaber battles occurred there was always so much more going on besides just two men clumsily swinging laser swords. Major character developments happen in these scenes and you get lots of emotion like temptation, anger, fear, etc. All of which were lacking in the lightsaber battles of the Prequel Trilogy.
I agree with your premise, but I don't think it applies to TPM. My personal favorite is Luke v. Vader I, but TDoF is a close second. There are many great character moments in the Duel of Fates, and unlike the ROTJ fight, it isn't bogged down by some bad choreography.
Watching how Obi-Wan, Qui-Gon and Maul react to the force fields teaches us about them. How Obi-Wan is first to ignite his Saber before its just him and Maul, tells us something about him. Maul's arrogance in allowing Obi-Wan to dangle tells us something.
There isn't much difference between Luke losing his mind on Vader in ROTJ and Obi-Wan doing the same to Maul other then Maul fights back and the fight is visually appealing. I mean I love Vader, but he has no upper body movement and it hurts the duels.
Luke being able to "defeat" Vader at the end of ROTJ by just wailing only works because Vader was already defeated at the end of ESB. He wasn't going to fight his son after that, at least not with any true intent to kill him. A Vader in the mood? Luke's wailing just doesn't work.
On he flip side, Maul isn't going to lie down for Obi-Wan and even uses Obi-Wan's rage against him. It is only once Obi-Wan finds his peace that he is able to win.
Not only that but the lightsaber was used far too much. In the Original Trilogy, the lightsaber was used rather sparingly. It was used enough to become an important tool in Luke and Vaders' arsenals and be the iconic weapon it is today, but when it was taken out, it meant it was time for business. Meanwhile in the Prequel Trilogy, it is used constantly to the point where the awe and wonder is taken away. It is treated as the most important thing about being a Jedi or Sith to the point where the Force is put to the wayside. The Force is what made the Jedi so great, not the lightsaber. It is also impossible to have any emotional connection during the lightsaber battles in the Prequel Trilogy due to far too much going on (The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones) and scenes being cluttered with pointless CGI special effects (Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith).
But isn't that kind of unfair? If we are going to set a film during the prime of the Jedi, wouldn't their be a lot of Saber action? Even in ROTJ, when Luke finally become proficient, it was his go to weapon. The Saber itself, used in conjunction with the force.
However I completely agree that the Force was minimized badly. I was waiting for the Jedi equivalent of Wizards and we never really got any.
This is why I am a big fan of the original CW shorts. Jedi using the Force to great effect and with some awesome creativity.
The over usage of the lightsaber also diminished what made some characters so great. Take Yoda for example. He's a character who has physical limitations due to his size and yet he is above them because of his great wisdom and knowledge of the Force. What made him so great is that you don't expect some little tiny impish creature being a great warrior and Jedi Master. He represented that the Force was far beyond physical attributes. What made him such a great warrior is that he didn't need a lightsaber at all to defeat his opponents. However, him using a lightsaber throws that to the side. Yoda's wise phrases such as "Size matters not" are completely ignored because it's just utterly impractical for Yoda to wield an infant sized lightsaber going up against a man three times his size, with a bigger lightsaber, and bigger reach. Physical altercations go completely against what Yoda represents as a character.
Or take Palpatine for example. In the Original Trilogy, Palpatine didn't look highly at the lightsaber. He viewed it as an ineffective Jedi weapon. He saw himself as so powerful, that he didn't need such a weapon to destroy his foes. And yet for no reason, he has one in the Prequel Trilogy and swings it like a crazy person.
I completely agree that Palps having a saber completely contradicts his character.
Disagree on Yoda. There is heavy emphasis on a Lightsaber being a Jedi's weapon. Yoda is "THE" Jedi. Him having and using a Lightsaber feels right.
Of course it shouldn't be a common sight. He should be blowing his opponents away with his mastery of the force, but that was lost in the PT, where Jedi are mainly swordsmen.
They were stupid ideas. First of all in a movie about science fantasy, I don't want to be bogged down by boring speeches taking place in Space Congress. Or wonder why something like a Trade Federation would have an army to begin with or be treated as an independent nation.
They should have gone with the political route, but they should have treated Senator Palpatine more like Chancellor Adolf Hitler and his rise to power should have been more like how totalitarian governments came to power before World War II (which heavily influenced Star Wars).
The Trade Federation was a great idea I thought. Easy way to sparkle a galactic conflict. They are just so poorly realized.
Also I think we agree on the premise. A Palpatine more akin to Hitler still would of produced plenty of Space Congress scenes. They just didn't need to well... suck.
The scenes with the senate remind me of the poker scenes in Casino Royale. They treat the audience like they don't know a thing about politics.
The podrace was utterly and entirely pointless.
Yes, that is what it ended up being, but I don't think it had to be. It a different scenario with a competent Anakin, it could of been the Ben-Hur scene they wanted it to be.
The few good ideas were poorly managed with the vast majority of ideas such as treating Darth Vader as some kind of Force messiah, the plots, the majority of characters, etc. were terrible.
Yep, which is quite sad.
