BlackLantern
Eternal
- Joined
- May 19, 2007
- Messages
- 77,148
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Denny ****ing Crane....
Mark Valley is never dispensable, damn it.On the other hand Boston Legal makes it pretty obvious that Alan Shore and Denny Crane are the heart of the show, and the rest are pretty much dispensable.![]()
Plus, I was really starting to like Constance Zimmer's character (even though I can't remember her name and always refer to her as "Constance Zimmer's character"). Mark Valley is never dispensable, damn it.Plus, I was really starting to like Constance Zimmer's character (even though I can't remember her name and always refer to her as "Constance Zimmer's character").
![]()
She could do both. She's Constance Zimmer and she's got the greatest smile in Hollywood.She is better on Entourage, profanity works well for her....
She could do both. She's Constance Zimmer and she's got the greatest smile in Hollywood.![]()

Finally...the Nielsen ratings system has landed on the web. Lets all sign up and vote for Stargate Atlantis. This is the place where our opinions can be heard by the industry people who decide what goes (and stays) on the air. Go to www.heynielsen.com/rankings/
How do I bring down SGA, in favor a superior replacement

I'd like to see a Stargate series with a non military vibe.....more about exploration and that type of thing....
Anything, SG-B, SG-C or SG-D It doesn't matter. I want less stargate extreme, and more back to the basics as SG1 was
The basics of SG is a military/civi team who explore worlds via the stargate.
The later seasons have focused on big bad enemies who pose a threat to Earth and the SG team try to stop them etc....
I get what you mean. We need a back to basics approach. Given that the humans now kick the crap out of all the posed threats in the show they may need to take a point of view from the lesser being of the galaxy.
it's just that everything is too easy. It's unbelievable... and any suspense that they create, fails because one always knows that an adequate solution will ALWAYS present itself in the way of McKay. It's all too easy, and the way the characters poke fun at it in the show is a little funny, but they've been using that thread for pretty much the entire series.
The other thing I hate, is I am now watching SG1, with worse writing, and a better budget. Main Villain + Replicators vs. SGA, same as Goauld + Replicators vs. SG1. The redundancy is just getting a little old with the show.
Really, the only reasons I keep up with SGA, is because I don't wanna get caught with my pants down when a new better SG series comes out, and be missing an entire series worth of cannon in my brain. And because the special effects are fun
SGA is definitely following the same formula as SG-1. Everything has become too easy, too. All of the problems arise from either failing power or the fact that the team itself has screwed some piece of tech that would've been godlike up. It all feels very manufactured now. But it's a bit of a catch-22 because, while I would like them to get back to the basic formula of the team exploring some planet and encountering a new race or figuring out some new tech, that's just going to add to their arsenal and make things even easier, which'll lead to even more contrived ways of taking that away so the team can still face some actual danger.
That said, I still enjoy the characters, their interaction, and the humorous banter. If Battlestar Galactica became this repetitive, sure, I might just quit watching in disgust. But after the last four years or so of SG-1? Honestly, a few chuckles is really all I need from a Stargate series.