Sam Fisher
Heavy Meddle
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2004
- Messages
- 14,743
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
Thanks!Welcome! Me too. I've always was more into SG1.
That was one of the things I loved about it too. When watching it, I always catch myself saying "Now we're in trouble," instead of now "Now they're in trouble."I liked both. Atlantis definitely felt a lot more derivative than SG-1, though. SG-1's first few seasons felt very fresh and novel, since the vast majority of cosmic sci fi actually took place out on spaceships in the distant future. Stargate was one of the first to take those concepts and really embed them as much as possible into "our world."
t:
Eh, I didn't mind O'Neill's departure. I just wish they'd done more with Mitchell. He really lacked an identity within the group and, consequently, within the show.Yeah. They seemed to forget what really made the show great.
And trying to have it without O'Neill?! Forget it! Didn't they learn anything from when they killed Danny off?![]()
I definitely would've found Vala's presence, Mitchell shooting up to the top of SG-1's command structure, and the new bad guys much more palatable if they'd been the launching point for a totally new show rather than a drastic shift in the SG-1 series.Too much changed too quickly for a lot of people to handle, IMHO.
Had they gone with the 'Stargate:Command' idea they had instead of continuing SG-1 for 2 more years then i think a lot of the changes would have been accepted.
I definitely would've found Vala's presence, Mitchell shooting up to the top of SG-1's command structure, and the new bad guys much more palatable if they'd been the launching point for a totally new show rather than a drastic shift in the SG-1 series.
I don't like Stargate SG-1, but I am brand new to Atlantis and I must say I like those characters better.. Huge Stargate SG-1 fan here, but I never really got into Atlantis.
