• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Tarzan

It is truly a shame what the American movie audience will support nowadays.
Edgar Rice Burroughs is one the classic American authors of action adventure.
And Tarzan is one of the classic heroes of all time. An icon in American pop culture.
Most of us at this site owes a great deal of debt to Tarzan.
The argument can be made he was the original superhero that many of our current comic heroes were based on.
He was around since 1914. Clearly predating any superhero in comics.
It's a shame that mindless stories heavy on effects [all Transformers movies] & light on plot will hypnotize the masses to go see it when something as classic as Tarzan makes the millenials and Gen-Xrs raise an eyebrow.
A disgrace.

Umm, this movie is about as effects heavy as anything else being released, if not more so. Just because it is a classic, doesn't mean this movie is good.
 
Well it's getting my 6 to 10 dollars so WB can be happy about that. :funny:
Wow, I wish that I lived an area where I could see movies for so little money for me, it is more like 12 to 14 dollars.
 
Last edited:
It is truly a shame what the American movie audience will support nowadays.
Edgar Rice Burroughs is one the classic American authors of action adventure.
And Tarzan is one of the classic heroes of all time. An icon in American pop culture.
Most of us at this site owes a great deal of debt to Tarzan.
The argument can be made he was the original superhero that many of our current comic heroes were based on.
He was around since 1914. Clearly predating any superhero in comics.
It's a shame that mindless stories heavy on effects [all Transformers movies] & light on plot will hypnotize the masses to go see it when something as classic as Tarzan makes the millenials and Gen-Xrs raise an eyebrow.
A disgrace.

The more recent adaptation of Edgar Rice Burrough's John Carter didn't do great at the box office either. I'm not sure if people are into pulpy hero stuff right now.

We will see how the new Zorro, Mandrake the magician and Flash Gordon films do if they ever get off the ground.
 
The more recent adaptation of Edgar Rice Burrough's John Carter didn't do great at the box office either. I'm not sure if people are into pulpy hero stuff right now.

We will see how the new Zorro, Mandrake the magician and Flash Gordon films do if they ever get off the ground.

Tarzan is more well known than John Carter, so that may help it.
 
It is truly a shame what the American movie audience will support nowadays.
Edgar Rice Burroughs is one the classic American authors of action adventure.
And Tarzan is one of the classic heroes of all time. An icon in American pop culture.
Most of us at this site owes a great deal of debt to Tarzan.
The argument can be made he was the original superhero that many of our current comic heroes were based on.
He was around since 1914. Clearly predating any superhero in comics.
It's a shame that mindless stories heavy on effects [all Transformers movies] & light on plot will hypnotize the masses to go see it when something as classic as Tarzan makes the millenials and Gen-Xrs raise an eyebrow.
A disgrace.


Huh? I mean... Huh? This film has SFX galore and... What is "disgraceful" about not seeing a movie? It's a movie, not the decision of whether civilization lives or dies.


What is going on with the world of online fans? Is it just lack of self awareness? Is it just me?
 
I don't know, man. For some reason they think they're better than everyone else.
 
It's $18-$22 over here :csad:

I can get a ticket as low as $2.50. Gotta love good competition in a fairly mid sized area.

Huh? I mean... Huh? This film has SFX galore and... What is "disgraceful" about not seeing a movie? It's a movie, not the decision of whether civilization lives or dies.


What is going on with the world of online fans? Is it just lack of self awareness? Is it just me?

Movie snobs still exists. For some reason, just because Tarzan was the popular hero in another time, it makes him more "respectable". I'm excited for the movie, but I don't think it is any more special than any other blockbuster.
 
I'm in NYC usually go to the AMC in Time Sq and the tickets range from $15 - $20

this movie looks good visually but I was never really a fan of the Tarzan story but Waltz and Jackson got my $$
 
Last edited:
Huh? I mean... Huh? This film has SFX galore and...
That's probably because no gorillas have studied at the Actor's Studio....and guys in monkey suits are so 1930's.

What is "disgraceful" about not seeing a movie?
And how long have you been posting on here? Have you not read any posts by our patrons?

It's a movie,
Is it? Or is it a religious experience?

not the decision of whether civilization lives or dies.
It appears you are not a ERB fan.....I will light a candle for you tonight.

What is going on with the world of online fans?
Says the guy who makes his own podcasts talking about movies and puts them online for all to hear.

Is it just lack of self awareness?
Not as far as I am....wait for it.....aware.

Is it just me?
Yep....absolutely....it's you...........:oldrazz:
 
Wow, I wish that I lived an area where I could see movies for so little money for me, it is more like 12 to 14 dollars.
Matenees are around $5 where I live. I don't think I would ever go to the theater if I had to pay what some of you guys do.
 
I use that moviepass thing where you pay like 35 bucks a month to get a movie ticket a day. I just be preordering **** days in advance and stockpile them. :o
 
The special effects Tarzan has was part of my point. They felt that had to be included or no one would care to even see it.
Whatever happened to choosing a movie based solely on its plot instead of special effects?
 
The special effects Tarzan has was part of my point. They felt that had to be included or no one would care to even see it.
Whatever happened to choosing a movie based solely on its plot instead of special effects?

Now I'm just confused. Are you for or against this movie? Most of us in this thread are for this movie. We just have realistic expectations of how well this movie will do.

And you do realize, for someone who is ranting about heavy special effects, you seem to be judging a lot of movies and people's preferences based on special effects, not plot.

That's called "reading the book".

lol

Though I am re-reading the book currently.
 
It is truly a shame what the American movie audience will support nowadays.
Edgar Rice Burroughs is one the classic American authors of action adventure.
And Tarzan is one of the classic heroes of all time. An icon in American pop culture.
Most of us at this site owes a great deal of debt to Tarzan.
The argument can be made he was the original superhero that many of our current comic heroes were based on.
He was around since 1914. Clearly predating any superhero in comics.
It's a shame that mindless stories heavy on effects [all Transformers movies] & light on plot will hypnotize the masses to go see it when something as classic as Tarzan makes the millenials and Gen-Xrs raise an eyebrow.
A disgrace.

I'm not saying I disagree with all of your sentiment Peyton Westlake. I think you make good points. Tarzan is classic, iconic material too. At the same time, just because a possible perception that audiences aren't supporting this film doesn't necessarily justify it along the same lines as being classic and iconic as well. It's only one new adaptation of Tarzan along a line that many have been made. I mean the original material still exists and it's still good and iconic.

Sherlock Holmes material is still getting made today in film or TV. I would say some it is very good and some of it is average. But just because it's based on Sherlock Holmes and Arthur Conan Doyle doesn't automatically justify its existence along with the classic material as well.

I mean from a premise of the idea that an Edgar Rice Burroughs fan is happy to see a new adaptation get made for Tarzan with a big budget and big name cast, I can see why that's worth getting exciting about.

For example, I love Dune and Frank Herbert. A part of me has always wanted to see something new get done with maybe a Dune movie. At the same time, I'd be concerned that a movie would just be too difficult to pull off. IMHO, even David Lynch didn't do a very satisfactory job.

Also at the same time, just because Tarzan inspired many later superhero stories and comic books IMHO doesn't mean audiences have an obligation to raise up this movie and make it a hit either just because its Tarzan and just because its Edgar Rice Burroughs. You can argue there are many aspects of Tarzan that are dated and part of a bygone era, making the character less relevant to contemporary audiences.

And yeah, it seems many are agreeing here that some of the CG effects shots look less than impressive. It's not even the gorilla CG that bothers me but like that stampede of wildebeests(?, water buffalo?) through the village.
 
We used to have theatres around here that charged like 6 bucks but then AMC swept in and bought every ****ing theatre in Northwest Indiana sans a couple indie houses.
 
I almost exclusively go to matinee shows, it's cheaper and you dont have to deal with ass*****. It's an easy win-win.
 
Price of a ticket.
raw
 
Though I am re-reading the book currently.

I originally read all the TARZAN books in the 70's (the 70's were a great time for fantasy readers...I bought just about every single book that ERB wrote back then in paperback...and read them all at the time)....and re-read the first 5 Tarzan books about 15 years ago.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"