Teh "new" Wonder Woman #1: What did you think?

[Deathlok2001]

Your theory is looney since theres nothing in the issue to back it up.

And is that not part of the fun of these forums? Reading different interpretations & impressions of the exact same comic you have just read.

 

[Darthphere]

And is that not part of the fun of these forums? Reading different interpretations & impressions of the exact same comic you have just read.

Yes, so ok, show me a panel, or page number that supports your theory?

 

[Doc Destruction]

I just realized the thread asks "what did you think?" and the symbol next to the thread is a big thumbs down. Nice objective questioning skills!

 

[Emerald Knight]

ummm...to have a theory, you need to have evidence to support it...you're just guessing, without any rhyme or reason. There was nothing in that issue that showed Diana as "powerless."

 

[WOLVERINE25TH]

Dude, it was the first issue. It hasta set up th' damn story. Give it till 3 or 4 before ya start *****ing.

 

[LibrarianThorne]

Loved it, and you have bad taste. Sorry, bro. And I remember the 70's...if we're going back there for quality of writing, then LET'S GO.

Heck yeah.

Is Denny O'Neil still around? We need someone to save Green Lantern. Again.

 

[ShadowBoxing]

Oh BTW, do you know that THAT'S Donna Troy as WW, and not Diana? If you don't, well it looks like you didn't read it and just flip-through it.

I haven't cleared out my box yet.

 

[GoldenAgeHero]

this book book was pretty good. dodson's art have seemed to improve alot. and i liked the the diana prince introduction.

 

[The Caped Knight]

The story so far is good , Dodson knows how to darw women well . And The highlight of the issue for me was Agent Diana Prince's introduction.