Goshdarn Batman
Hm...?
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2005
- Messages
- 4,146
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 31
This film looks like good fan wank! I'm game!![]()
I prefer to eat popcorn when I watch movies.
This film looks like good fan wank! I'm game!![]()
Trailer makes my head hurt![]()
Broseph44 said:I love them all, even 3 and salvation. I actually like Salvation a lot.

Is this movie going to be one those
" I didnt understand inception"
"I didn't understand Mission impossible"
John Connor goes back in time like in the original 1984 movie but he basically ends up in an alternate reality.
A t-800 was sent back earlier to protect a young Sarah Connor. He raises her and calls him pops
1984 Sarah Connor is no longer a scared waitress
since she knows that her ''father'' T800 came from the future that would be proof that it was always her faultI wonder for how long skynet had a functional time machine and for what purpose?
Obviously we know they use it as a last attempt to win the war but surely they didnt build it in the final moments so what was its use?
Also what if young Sarah and the T 800 have been working on building a time machine since she was saved by him
t:So is this a reboot of the entire Terminator franchise or is it a sequel or a reboot/sequel. The trailer looks good but I am just confused about the story and timeline and how it fits with all the other movies. Wasn't Christian Bale John Connor in the last movie? Now its another person playing John Conner again?

We must send someone back in time...to stop the writer
I prefer to eat popcorn when I watch movies.

I wish we could go forward in time since it's only 5 more years until James Cameron gets the rights back and hopefully let's this sleeping dog lie.
So enjoy this crap while you can those of you who enjoyed garbage like Terminator Salvation cause these are the end days for more unnecessary Terminator crap from Hollywood. Thank god.
I can prove it, just look at the clock. Life imitates art...Because nothing makes sense. Like if a T-800 was sent back in time to protect a young Sarah Connor, why even bother sending Kyle Reese in the first place? Why is Sarah Connor way more badass than Kyle Reese? Why not send a T-1000 in the first place now? And the Star Trek styled reboot idea is just dumb to begin with.Is this movie going to be one those
" I didnt understand inception"
"I didn't understand Mission impossible"
John Connor goes back in time like in the original 1984 movie but he basically ends up in an alternate reality.
A t-800 was sent back earlier to protect a young Sarah Connor. He raises her and calls him pops
1984 Sarah Connor is no longer a scared waitress
I wish we could go forward in time since it's only 5 more years until James Cameron gets the rights back and hopefully let's this sleeping dog lie.
So is this a reboot of the entire Terminator franchise or is it a sequel or a reboot/sequel. The trailer looks good but I am just confused about the story and timeline and how it fits with all the other movies. Wasn't Christian Bale John Connor in the last movie? Now its another person playing John Conner again?