Terminator: Genisys - Part 6

Status
Not open for further replies.
kinopoisk.ru-Terminator_3A-Genisys-2605003.jpg
 
I think they did well with Arnie's wardrobe in this, I must say.
 
To reiterate,

The story told in Terminator 1 is completely logical and follows the rules of time travel that nearly all physicists believe to be the correct ones. This is the causality chart:

Sarah gives birth to John -> John becomes leader of resistance -> John sends Kyle back through time -> Kyle has sex with Sarah -> Sarah gives birth to John.

The logic is 100% circular, as it should be. Time travel logic is supposed to be circular. A->B->C->D->A. The technical term for this is "closed timelike curve". A circle, as in circular logic, is a closed curve.

Terminator 1, Interstellar, get this right. Terminator 2, Back to the Future 2, Days of Future Past get this wrong.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_timelike_curve

One feature of a CTC is that it opens the possibility of a worldline which is not connected to earlier times, and so the existence of events that cannot be traced to an earlier cause. Ordinarily, causality demands that each event in spacetime is preceded by its cause in every rest frame. This principle is critical in determinism, which in the language of general relativity states complete knowledge of the universe on a spacelike Cauchy surface can be used to calculate the complete state of the rest of spacetime. However, in a CTC, causality breaks down, because an event can be "simultaneous" with its cause—in some sense an event may be able to cause itself. It is impossible to determine based only on knowledge of the past whether or not something exists in the CTC that can interfere with other objects in spacetime. A CTC therefore results in a Cauchy horizon, and a region of spacetime that cannot be predicted from perfect knowledge of some past time.

With time travel movies I don't think you can be too nitpicky, because they all fall apart if you try to analyze them.
No, they don't. See above.
 
Last edited:
To reiterate,

The story told in Terminator 1 is completely logical and follows the rules of time travel that nearly all physicists believe to be the correct ones. This is the causality chart:

Sarah gives birth to John -> John becomes leader of resistance -> John sends Kyle back through time -> Kyle has sex with Sarah -> Sarah gives birth to John.

The logic is 100% circular, as it should be. Time travel logic is supposed to be circular. A->B->C->D->A. The technical term for this is "closed timelike curve". A circle, as in circular logic, is a closed curve.

Terminator 1, Interstellar, get this right. Terminator 2, Back to the Future 2, Days of Future Past get this wrong.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_timelike_curve




No, they don't. See above.

actually, in the very end, it does fall apart, because there is a final point that cannot be explained away even in the events of Terminator 1.

There HAS to have been an 'original' timeline > before actual timetravel.

In this 'original' timeline, this is probably somewhat how it must have happened;

Sarah Connor lives in 1984 and at some point after that, gets pregnant with John Connor. This John Connor can NOT have come from Kyle Reese; Kyle Reese is not even born yet.
Nor is Skynet. Nothing yet. It's just, 1984, as it is. A normal mom, with a normal child.

13 years later, in 1997, Skynet becomes self-aware and starts a war vs mankind. John is around 13 years old then. John somehow becomes leader of the resistance.
He does this, originally, without the knowledge his mother had of the machines as they only came into play as of 1997.

at some point before 2029, John Connor leads the resistance. The machines construct a time-travelling machine in order to send a Terminator to 1984 to kill Sarah Connor.

At this stage in time - before the time travel occurs - Kyle Reese is a member of the resistance, under John Connor, and volounteers to travel in time to protect Sarah Connor from the Terminator.

This original John Connor knows very well that Kyle Reese is obviously not his father - he can't be. He doesn't know whom his real father is,
since Sarah Connor had a good b*ng with a total stranger and she was knocked up first shot.

He trusts Kyle Reese, a member of the resistance, whom is NOT his father, to be capable of protecting his mother, a woman who Kyle Reese never met, and only gets handed a picture of her.

The facts in this original timeline must be this;
- John Connor's father originally was NOT Kyle Reese.
- Sarah Connor lived a normal life untill 1997 (Judgement Day)
- There never was a Terminator present in 1984

This must have happened in time, as Skynet invented the time travelling machine. Time travel can not have happened before it's invention.
Thus there can never have been a Terminator before it's sending device was invented and constructed somewhere in 2029.

So then the original timeline gets 'ended' in 2029.
Or, better said, time gets changed in 1984, essentially, and if you go deep, it means that everything past that moment never yet has happened so anything happening then becomes canon.

Even though it's an 'alternate' timeline, it becomes the real/canonical timeline.

In this alternate timeline, but the real 1984, The Terminator arrives to kill Sarah Connor, and kyle reese arrives in order to protect her.

So then Sarah Connor is protected by Kyle Reese, they manage to prevent the Terminator to kill her, and destroy the thing.
Kyle Reese in the events gets a crush / b*ner on Sarah Connor and Sarah Connor gets the hots for this 'savior' and at some point they 'get it on' and Kyle gets Sarah Connor pregnant.

That means, that this John Connor is a different one than the original one.

To put it a bit clearer, original John Connor might have been, for example, John Marshall:
In the original 1984, there was no Kyle Reese, no running from a terminator. She goes out, or meets a stranger - let's call him Mr. Marshall, and after some humping occurs, becomes pregnant.

Instead, thanks to the arrival of the Terminator and Kyle Reese, the running and screaming cause Sarah NOT to ever meet mr. Marshall, and thus not have a good darn b*ng with mr. Marshall, and thus
Sarah never gets pregnant from mr. Marshall, so then in a way, Skynet actually succeeds, and prevents the REAL John Connor (John Marshall) from getting born.
Sarah Connor instead - being the sexy horny-*ss 80's bombshell she is - humps Kyle Reese, so then the child that she gives birth to later, and calls John Connor, really is John Reese.
He's named after his mother though, so It is John Connor - but it's NOT the original John Connor of the original timeline resistance.

The John Connor that sends Kyle Reese back in 2029 is not the same John Connor that gets born in 1984/1985.
The original John Connor was John "Marshall", whom sends Kyle Reese back in time.
The alternate timeline John Connor is John "Reese", whom sends Kyle Reese - not knowing he is his father - to protect his mother.

John Reese - named John Connor -ultimately becomes a resistance leader, just like the original John Marshall was.
But John Marshall never gets born, as Sarah Connor is pregnant thanks to Kyle Reese.

Sarah teaches John Reese everything that Kyle Reese told her about John 'Marshall'.
Essentially, John Reese is forced to become the resistance leader that John Marshall 'was' in the original timeline.

This 'second' timeline, this 'alternate' timeline, is the one that can become the never-ending circle, and this makes the movie so good and great.

It is however, NOT the original timeline. that one was erased. This one is a looper.

Sarah Connor, nor John Connor know about the original timeline, and 'John Marshall' never existed.
 
Last edited:
That whole thing still makes my head hurt.
 
actually, in the very end, it does fall apart, because there is a final point that cannot be explained away even in the events of Terminator 1.

There HAS to have been an 'original' timeline > before actual timetravel.

In this 'original' timeline, this is probably somewhat how it must have happened;

Sarah Connor lives in 1984 and at some point after that, gets pregnant with John Connor. This John Connor can NOT have come from Kyle Reese; Kyle Reese is not even born yet.
Nor is Skynet. Nothing yet. It's just, 1984, as it is. A normal mom, with a normal child.

13 years later, in 1997, Skynet becomes self-aware and starts a war vs mankind. John is around 13 years old then. John somehow becomes leader of the resistance.
He does this, originally, without the knowledge his mother had of the machines as they only came into play as of 1997.

at some point before 2029, John Connor leads the resistance. The machines construct a time-travelling machine in order to send a Terminator to 1984 to kill Sarah Connor.

At this stage in time - before the time travel occurs - Kyle Reese is a member of the resistance, under John Connor, and volounteers to travel in time to protect Sarah Connor from the Terminator.

This original John Connor knows very well that Kyle Reese is obviously not his father - he can't be. He doesn't know whom his real father is,
since Sarah Connor had a good b*ng with a total stranger and she was knocked up first shot.

He trusts Kyle Reese, a member of the resistance, whom is NOT his father, to be capable of protecting his mother, a woman who Kyle Reese never met, and only gets handed a picture of her.

The facts in this original timeline must be this;
- John Connor's father originally was NOT Kyle Reese.
- Sarah Connor lived a normal life untill 1997 (Judgement Day)
- There never was a Terminator present in 1984

This must have happened in time, as Skynet invented the time travelling machine. Time travel can not have happened before it's invention.
Thus there can never have been a Terminator before it's sending device was invented and constructed somewhere in 2029.

So then the original timeline gets 'ended' in 2029.
Or, better said, time gets changed in 1984, essentially, and if you go deep, it means that everything past that moment never yet has happened so anything happening then becomes canon.

Even though it's an 'alternate' timeline, it becomes the real/canonical timeline.

In this alternate timeline, but the real 1984, The Terminator arrives to kill Sarah Connor, and kyle reese arrives in order to protect her.

So then Sarah Connor is protected by Kyle Reese, they manage to prevent the Terminator to kill her, and destroy the thing.
Kyle Reese in the events gets a crush / b*ner on Sarah Connor and Sarah Connor gets the hots for this 'savior' and at some point they 'get it on' and Kyle gets Sarah Connor pregnant.

That means, that this John Connor is a different one than the original one.

To put it a bit clearer, original John Connor might have been, for example, John Marshall:
In the original 1984, there was no Kyle Reese, no running from a terminator. She goes out, or meets a stranger - let's call him Mr. Marshall, and after some humping occurs, becomes pregnant.

Instead, thanks to the arrival of the Terminator and Kyle Reese, the running and screaming cause Sarah NOT to ever meet mr. Marshall, and thus not have a good darn b*ng with mr. Marshall, and thus
Sarah never gets pregnant from mr. Marshall, so then in a way, Skynet actually succeeds, and prevents the REAL John Connor (John Marshall) from getting born.
Sarah Connor instead - being the sexy horny-*ss 80's bombshell she is - humps Kyle Reese, so then the child that she gives birth to later, and calls John Connor, really is John Reese.
He's named after his mother though, so It is John Connor - but it's NOT the original John Connor of the original timeline resistance.

The John Connor that sends Kyle Reese back in 2029 is not the same John Connor that gets born in 1984/1985.
The original John Connor was John "Marshall", whom sends Kyle Reese back in time.
The alternate timeline John Connor is John "Reese", whom sends Kyle Reese - not knowing he is his father - to protect his mother.

John Reese - named John Connor -ultimately becomes a resistance leader, just like the original John Marshall was.
But John Marshall never gets born, as Sarah Connor is pregnant thanks to Kyle Reese.

Sarah teaches John Reese everything that Kyle Reese told her about John 'Marshall'.
Essentially, John Reese is forced to become the resistance leader that John Marshall 'was' in the original timeline.

This 'second' timeline, this 'alternate' timeline, is the one that can become the never-ending circle, and this makes the movie so good and great.

It is however, NOT the original timeline. that one was erased. This one is a looper.

Sarah Connor, nor John Connor know about the original timeline, and 'John Marshall' never existed.

My head hurts.:(
 
actually, in the very end, it does fall apart, because there is a final point that cannot be explained away even in the events of Terminator 1.

There HAS to have been an 'original' timeline > before actual timetravel.

In this 'original' timeline, this is probably somewhat how it must have happened;

Sarah Connor lives in 1984 and at some point after that, gets pregnant with John Connor. This John Connor can NOT have come from Kyle Reese; Kyle Reese is not even born yet.
Nor is Skynet. Nothing yet. It's just, 1984, as it is. A normal mom, with a normal child.

13 years later, in 1997, Skynet becomes self-aware and starts a war vs mankind. John is around 13 years old then. John somehow becomes leader of the resistance.
He does this, originally, without the knowledge his mother had of the machines as they only came into play as of 1997.

at some point before 2029, John Connor leads the resistance. The machines construct a time-travelling machine in order to send a Terminator to 1984 to kill Sarah Connor.

At this stage in time - before the time travel occurs - Kyle Reese is a member of the resistance, under John Connor, and volounteers to travel in time to protect Sarah Connor from the Terminator.

This original John Connor knows very well that Kyle Reese is obviously not his father - he can't be. He doesn't know whom his real father is,
since Sarah Connor had a good b*ng with a total stranger and she was knocked up first shot.

He trusts Kyle Reese, a member of the resistance, whom is NOT his father, to be capable of protecting his mother, a woman who Kyle Reese never met, and only gets handed a picture of her.

The facts in this original timeline must be this;
- John Connor's father originally was NOT Kyle Reese.
- Sarah Connor lived a normal life untill 1997 (Judgement Day)
- There never was a Terminator present in 1984

This must have happened in time, as Skynet invented the time travelling machine. Time travel can not have happened before it's invention.
Thus there can never have been a Terminator before it's sending device was invented and constructed somewhere in 2029.

So then the original timeline gets 'ended' in 2029.
Or, better said, time gets changed in 1984, essentially, and if you go deep, it means that everything past that moment never yet has happened so anything happening then becomes canon.

Even though it's an 'alternate' timeline, it becomes the real/canonical timeline.

In this alternate timeline, but the real 1984, The Terminator arrives to kill Sarah Connor, and kyle reese arrives in order to protect her.

So then Sarah Connor is protected by Kyle Reese, they manage to prevent the Terminator to kill her, and destroy the thing.
Kyle Reese in the events gets a crush / b*ner on Sarah Connor and Sarah Connor gets the hots for this 'savior' and at some point they 'get it on' and Kyle gets Sarah Connor pregnant.

That means, that this John Connor is a different one than the original one.

To put it a bit clearer, original John Connor might have been, for example, John Marshall:
In the original 1984, there was no Kyle Reese, no running from a terminator. She goes out, or meets a stranger - let's call him Mr. Marshall, and after some humping occurs, becomes pregnant.

Instead, thanks to the arrival of the Terminator and Kyle Reese, the running and screaming cause Sarah NOT to ever meet mr. Marshall, and thus not have a good darn b*ng with mr. Marshall, and thus
Sarah never gets pregnant from mr. Marshall, so then in a way, Skynet actually succeeds, and prevents the REAL John Connor (John Marshall) from getting born.
Sarah Connor instead - being the sexy horny-*ss 80's bombshell she is - humps Kyle Reese, so then the child that she gives birth to later, and calls John Connor, really is John Reese.
He's named after his mother though, so It is John Connor - but it's NOT the original John Connor of the original timeline resistance.

The John Connor that sends Kyle Reese back in 2029 is not the same John Connor that gets born in 1984/1985.
The original John Connor was John "Marshall", whom sends Kyle Reese back in time.
The alternate timeline John Connor is John "Reese", whom sends Kyle Reese - not knowing he is his father - to protect his mother.

John Reese - named John Connor -ultimately becomes a resistance leader, just like the original John Marshall was.
But John Marshall never gets born, as Sarah Connor is pregnant thanks to Kyle Reese.

Sarah teaches John Reese everything that Kyle Reese told her about John 'Marshall'.
Essentially, John Reese is forced to become the resistance leader that John Marshall 'was' in the original timeline.

This 'second' timeline, this 'alternate' timeline, is the one that can become the never-ending circle, and this makes the movie so good and great.

It is however, NOT the original timeline. that one was erased. This one is a looper.

Sarah Connor, nor John Connor know about the original timeline, and 'John Marshall' never existed.

Sums it up well :up:

By all rights It has to start somewhere but the problem with T1 is that Kyle has the picture of Sarah that the boy takes at the end, in the future. That indicates that it is a paradox with no beginning.

Afterall Sarah would be a normal woman still as a waitress and not driving off into South America at that point as she only did that due to time travel interference
 
To reiterate,

The story told in Terminator 1 is completely logical and follows the rules of time travel that nearly all physicists believe to be the correct ones. This is the causality chart:

Sarah gives birth to John -> John becomes leader of resistance -> John sends Kyle back through time -> Kyle has sex with Sarah -> Sarah gives birth to John.

The logic is 100% circular, as it should be. Time travel logic is supposed to be circular. A->B->C->D->A. The technical term for this is "closed timelike curve". A circle, as in circular logic, is a closed curve.

Terminator 1, Interstellar, get this right. Terminator 2, Back to the Future 2, Days of Future Past get this wrong.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_timelike_curve




No, they don't. See above.

Don't forget Skynet as well.

Skynet is created -> Skynet causes Judgment Day -> After long war with humans, Skynet sends Terminator back through time to eliminate resistance leader's mother -> Terminator is destroyed in Cyberdyne factory -> Cyberdyne takes remaining parts of Terminator for research -> Skynet is created

However, do the same time travel rules apply if a person's consciousness is sent back through time as oppose to the body, i.e. X-Men: DOFP and Edge of Tomorrow?
 
Last edited:
Oh man, I hate getting into this debate but it drives me crazy when people think John Connor had a different father in the "original timeline"...

Kyle Reese HAS always been John's father.

It's all in the first film. That's how Sarah was able to prepare and train John for war since he was a child and was able to go into hiding when the bombs dropped, when Judgment Day occurred. Kyle explicitly TOLD Sarah this in T1. How could Sarah have known when Judgment Day occurred? Or have any knowledge of Judgment Day and the future? Or train her son since he was child, for a war?

Because Kyle was ALWAYS there to tell her.

Here's the kicker. The iconic photo. The one Kyle had in the "original timeline" is the same one she takes at the end of T1. Kyle mentions that he always wondered what she was thinking at that moment and why she looked so sad? She was thinking of him.

The whole genius of the original film is that it was a loop. Kyle was John's father. Sarah even mentions in the tapes, that if he doesn't send Kyle back, he can never be. Not to mention, it makes no sense that two different men, could father the same child. It's biologically impossible.

Same with Skynet. It's existence is completely dependent on the chip from the original original T-800. They reversed engineered it (as shown in T2).
 
Terminator is a loop time travel.It really doesn't make sense if you think about it.
 
Oh man, I hate getting into this debate but it drives me crazy when people think John Connor had a different father in the "original timeline"...

Kyle Reese HAS always been John's father.

It's all in the first film. That's how Sarah was able to prepare and train John for war since he was a child and was able to go into hiding when the bombs dropped, when Judgment Day occurred. Kyle explicitly TOLD Sarah this in T1. How could Sarah have known when Judgment Day occurred? Or have any knowledge of Judgment Day and the future? Or train her son since he was child, for a war?

Because Kyle was ALWAYS there to tell her.

Here's the kicker. The iconic photo. The one Kyle had in the "original timeline" is the same one she takes at the end of T1. Kyle mentions that he always wondered what she was thinking at that moment and why she looked so sad? She was thinking of him.

The whole genius of the original film is that it was a loop. Kyle was John's father. Sarah even mentions in the tapes, that if he doesn't send Kyle back, he can never be. Not to mention, it makes no sense that two different men, could father the same child. It's biologically impossible.

Same with Skynet. It's existence is completely dependent on the chip from the original original T-800. They reversed engineered it (as shown in T2).

The problem with the loop is it can't start as it relies on the end being the start.
 
The problem with the loop is it can't start as it relies on the end being the start.
Time is fluid. There is no "order" to it. We just apply an order to it, to make sense of it. Thank you Doctor Who and a lot of other sci-fi. :funny:
 
The problem with the loop is it can't start as it relies on the end being the start.

Well, I won't debate the intricacies of time travel and what is or isn't possible (It's fiction. It's all make believe. ;)) but it is a loop. The entire structure of the first film is based on that very premise, that it already happened and it will happen again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,327
Messages
22,086,601
Members
45,885
Latest member
RadioactiveMan
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"