CelticPredator
Superhero
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2008
- Messages
- 9,155
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Whoops/.
Last edited:
And it will suck, twice as hard.
PLEASE TERMINATE THIS FRANCHISE.
(T2 was released in 1992 and there is no Saw 7).
Did Salvation make a profit or what?
Well...pretty much for WB and Sony (especially the latter), not so much Holycon
Cameron can go and suck a lemon.I think it was a mistake to ever continue this without Cameron.
At 50 mill, it'll probably be a feel good PG rated family comedy...![]()
I would prefer Cameron come back, but that's mainly because at this point I have doubts that anyone new will come along and make this series great again.
Cameron was clever, he knew anything beyond a second Terminator 2 film would be getting into some seriously confusing and murky water. Now he can fake outraged indignation alongside the fans at what the franchise has become, when in reality he knows himself how difficult it would have been to continue what he started.
Not so sure about that, he changed the ending of T2 to still make a Terminator 3 a possibility. He was still considering a return to the franchise at that point.
I dont think thats the case anymore but for a time I do believe he considered doing it.
Either way, I kinda hope Lionsgate dont get the rights.
Didn't the studio lean on him to change the ending?
If he really cared about his "baby" you would think that he would feel obliged to step up and take the bull by the horns.
50 million Hard R Terminator film directed by Blomkamp that ignores Salvation as some alternate timeline would be awesome.
I think if they move forward with a new film, its more than likely bale wouldnt be involved?
50 million Hard R Terminator film directed by Blomkamp that ignores Salvation as some alternate timeline would be awesome.