• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

The 2028 Presidential election in the U.S.

squeekness

I'm a poor lost puppy
Staff member
Joined
Aug 29, 2005
Messages
161,904
Reaction score
25,357
Points
218


 
Last edited:
Hope not. He's already lost too many marbles.
 
We have to safeguard and reverse the current erosion of democracy under the tyranny of Trump and ****ty governor followers first.

Pritzker and Walz are on my radar as better choices than Newsom and Buttigieg. But whoever it is pretty much has to be a white dude in order to keep the margin of votes numbers of men that live in forests/farmland and flyover country closer than female candidates are able to do unfortunately, as well as the manosphere voter guys found everywhere. It’s not fair but that’s our reality.
 
We have to safeguard and reverse the current erosion of democracy under the tyranny of Trump and ****ty governor followers first.

Pritzker and Walz are on my radar as better choices than Newsom and Buttigieg. But whoever it is pretty much has to be a white dude in order to keep the margin of votes numbers of men that live in forests/farmland and flyover country closer than female candidates are able to do unfortunately, as well as the manosphere voter guys found everywhere. It’s not fair but that’s our reality.
I could vote for Walz easily. :)
 
Just as long as whoever gets the nomination can defeat Trump or Vance in the general election. (Assuming people in America are still allowed to vote in 2028.)
Allowed to vote and have their vote count. 'Malfunctions' and dumpsters, and them just flat out not accepting defeat are probably the biggest concern. Well, right after them legit winning.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"