The Amazing Spider-Man 2 The Amazing Spiderman 2 - User Review Thread! - SPOILERS! - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Some good quips in this film, the best was the power plant fight between Spider-Man and Electro,
Electro:[BLACKOUT]I'll be like a God[/BLACKOUT]
Spider-Man:[BLACKOUT]A God called sparkles?[/BLACKOUT]

:funny:

:funny: :up:
 
I just think you are blowing it way out of proportion. It's not like her head got split like a melon. Yeah, the scene was supposed to make you wince, but also put you in shock over what just happened. You knew she was gone. But from Spidey's point of view, he got her just in time. And you're sitting there, knowing she is gone, and have to watch Spidey slowly come to the realization himself.

Like i said what is brutal to me isn't to you, i find the impact unnecessarily,just the snap was okay but that.. lets just stop here.
 
i really don't think her head hit the ground because

1. i personally don't remember seeing that, maybe her hair touched the ground

2. it would make sense in a sad way that peter would have saved her from hitting the ground but killed her trying too

why would her head have hit the ground? wouldn't that have split her head open? the force of how high she fell along with the webb grabbing her would really done damage, or do we think webb thought people may not know what happened so had to include that?

i may be wrong but i personally don't buy it
 
I'm guessing Peter calls Electro sparkles a lot in this film.
 
The scene with him and Rhino (can't spell his real name) in the opening act reminds me of Spectacular. He's all like "Hey I'm Spider-Man and I need you to pull over thanks!"
 
Can come one compile the most memorable quips?
 
i really don't think her head hit the ground because

1. i personally don't remember seeing that, maybe her hair touched the ground

2. it would make sense in a sad way that peter would have saved her from hitting the ground but killed her trying too

why would her head have hit the ground? wouldn't that have split her head open? the force of how high she fell along with the webb grabbing her would really done damage, or do we think webb thought people may not know what happened so had to include that?

i may be wrong but i personally don't buy it

Not necessarily. People haved died from head/brain damage due to physical trauma without being split open. You have to remember that she bled from the nose which suggests serious internal trauma, trauma that wouldn't be caused by whiplash in itself.
 
Was the "Itsy Bitsy Spider" line in the film? I don't remember it being in it :\

By the way, Gwen's head DEFINITELY hit the ground. It was what I remember the most. That was what made it so brutal.
 
i really don't think her head hit the ground because

1. i personally don't remember seeing that, maybe her hair touched the ground

2. it would make sense in a sad way that peter would have saved her from hitting the ground but killed her trying too

why would her head have hit the ground? wouldn't that have split her head open? the force of how high she fell along with the webb grabbing her would really done damage, or do we think webb thought people may not know what happened so had to include that?

i may be wrong but i personally don't buy it

I think it was done brilliantly. People are questioning in she dies from her heads hitting the ground or from a neck snap. They left it open for interpretation
 
Was the "Itsy Bitsy Spider" line in the film? I don't remember it being in it :\

By the way, Gwen's head DEFINITELY hit the ground. It was what I remember the most. That was what made it so brutal.

I don't remember it, either.

I do however remember Electro playing the melody at the power plant. :yay::yay:
 
Hey guys, here is my review of the film below. Overall, I really enjoyed it, despite some major problems with the screenplay at times. I was really missing the Mary Jane scenes and would have been happy to see them despite how busy the film was.

Warning Mild Spoilers Contained Within


The Amazing Spider-Man 2 in the context of the whole comic book movie genre, that has blossomed and reached it`s middle phase, represents an interesting quandary for the nature of films in the genre. The question is this, what is more important in a comic book movie, the hero or the villain? Does it matter that the ratio of good representing one of these fundamentally overshadows the other. In the case of this picture, the focus is primarily on Spider-Man and his alter-ego Peter Parker, which is a great thing. However, this comes at the expense of the villains, who for the most part feel sketchily developed.

This does not spell doom and gloom for the film, as in this case I could forgive the latter problem. This is because I thought each of the villains served the thematic elements of the screenplay and story. The main idea at play being what it really feels like to be Spider-Man. This is not only from the good aspects which come in the form of a great showcase of his web swinging and power set. But also, the personal and public perception of him, which on the one hand the villains represented.

Taking aside Rhino, who just fulfils a larger ambition of the film and turns up in what is the closest thing, the Spider-Man movies will come to a Bond pre-credits sequence. Electro, who was the weakest written, represents the negative aspect of Spidey, what his example and heroism can spur of in people, with his casual misguided qiuping. Harry Osborne, represents someone who has been rejected too, in this case his very life being denied, because Spider-Man refuses to save him. This is due to a fear of his blood been exposed to his best friend and the consequence that may come from it.

Elsewhere, the screenplay feels very packed, almost looking like it is going to physically burst sometimes scenes. There is a lot of set up with characters primed for future instalments, lurking in the background. This is coupled with a bit too many contrivances. Exactly how many creepy guys does Gwen encounter in her workplace lift, that go on to become big bads?

While watching the picture, you are almost convinced it is going to be a running joke on the part of the writers. Perhaps the worst mistake of the screenplay is with simple solution of the epicentre for all villinary and skullduggery in New York being Oscorp. It calls into question, the logic and motives of the creation of a certain team, and does not bode well for the franchise's future.

Andrew Garfield, returns as the web swinger and true believers, the impossible has happened. With just a second turn as the character, Garfield has etched himself into the upper echelon of comic book actors, that include the likes of Bale, Reeve and Jackman. For all his time in screen, Garfield represents the pinnacle of what Spider-Man should be. This comes from his comic timing, movement in the suit and all his combustible nervous energy, as Parker is endearing to watch.

Emma Stone equals Garfields acting, with fantastic comedic skills, emotional pathos and a real inner strength. Elsewhere, Dane DeHaan plays his dual role like an out of control, rock star who is on the edge of burning out and his intensity works very well in eliciting Harry with sympathy. Jamie Foxx is commendable as Electro, with a cool vocal performance and manic energy. But his pre-transformation performance, is a little unbelievable, due to the actual casting itself which is not Foxx`s fault at all. Finally, Paul Giamatti, looks like he is having a lot of fun, feeling as though his inner five year old has suddenly awakened and decided to put on a performance that even all the back row can hear.

Hans Zimmer took over scoring duties from James Horner and the result is perhaps his most experimental score to date. Teaming up with collaborators such as Pharrell Williams and Johnny Marr, Zimmer creates interesting themes, two of which stand out. The first is the Spider-Man theme which in its use of trumpets and natural film sounds, combine to create the youthful energy of the character. The second is Harry`s theme which sounds like a background alarm going off faintly in the distance, combined with a real melancholic edge which is illustrated with its great use of violins.

The strength of Amazing Spider-Man 2 will depend on exactly how much cheese you can take with your villains. There is a line in the picture in which Peter states that his superior pays him wages that would be acceptable in 1961, that about sums up the depth of the baddies. This is contrasted with a very strong hero journey, romance and portrayal, that fundamentally make the film worth checking out, this Easter.
 
Hey guys, here is my review of the film below. Overall, I really enjoyed it, despite some major problems with the screenplay at times. I was really missing the Mary Jane scenes and would have been happy to see them despite how busy the film was.

Warning Mild Spoilers Contained Within


The Amazing Spider-Man 2 in the context of the whole comic book movie genre, that has blossomed and reached it`s middle phase, represents an interesting quandary for the nature of films in the genre. The question is this, what is more important in a comic book movie, the hero or the villain? Does it matter that the ratio of good representing one of these fundamentally overshadows the other. In the case of this picture, the focus is primarily on Spider-Man and his alter-ego Peter Parker, which is a great thing. However, this comes at the expense of the villains, who for the most part feel sketchily developed.

This does not spell doom and gloom for the film, as in this case I could forgive the latter problem. This is because I thought each of the villains served the thematic elements of the screenplay and story. The main idea at play being what it really feels like to be Spider-Man. This is not only from the good aspects which come in the form of a great showcase of his web swinging and power set. But also, the personal and public perception of him, which on the one hand the villains represented.

Taking aside Rhino, who just fulfils a larger ambition of the film and turns up in what is the closest thing, the Spider-Man movies will come to a Bond pre-credits sequence. Electro, who was the weakest written, represents the negative aspect of Spidey, what his example and heroism can spur of in people, with his casual misguided qiuping. Harry Osborne, represents someone who has been rejected too, in this case his very life being denied, because Spider-Man refuses to save him. This is due to a fear of his blood been exposed to his best friend and the consequence that may come from it.

Elsewhere, the screenplay feels very packed, almost looking like it is going to physically burst sometimes scenes. There is a lot of set up with characters primed for future instalments, lurking in the background. This is coupled with a bit too many contrivances. Exactly how many creepy guys does Gwen encounter in her workplace lift, that go on to become big bads?

While watching the picture, you are almost convinced it is going to be a running joke on the part of the writers. Perhaps the worst mistake of the screenplay is with simple solution of the epicentre for all villinary and skullduggery in New York being Oscorp. It calls into question, the logic and motives of the creation of a certain team, and does not bode well for the franchise's future.

Andrew Garfield, returns as the web swinger and true believers, the impossible has happened. With just a second turn as the character, Garfield has etched himself into the upper echelon of comic book actors, that include the likes of Bale, Reeve and Jackman. For all his time in screen, Garfield represents the pinnacle of what Spider-Man should be. This comes from his comic timing, movement in the suit and all his combustible nervous energy, as Parker is endearing to watch.

Emma Stone equals Garfields acting, with fantastic comedic skills, emotional pathos and a real inner strength. Elsewhere, Dane DeHaan plays his dual role like an out of control, rock star who is on the edge of burning out and his intensity works very well in eliciting Harry with sympathy. Jamie Foxx is commendable as Electro, with a cool vocal performance and manic energy. But his pre-transformation performance, is a little unbelievable, due to the actual casting itself which is not Foxx`s fault at all. Finally, Paul Giamatti, looks like he is having a lot of fun, feeling as though his inner five year old has suddenly awakened and decided to put on a performance that even all the back row can hear.

Hans Zimmer took over scoring duties from James Horner and the result is perhaps his most experimental score to date. Teaming up with collaborators such as Pharrell Williams and Johnny Marr, Zimmer creates interesting themes, two of which stand out. The first is the Spider-Man theme which in its use of trumpets and natural film sounds, combine to create the youthful energy of the character. The second is Harry`s theme which sounds like a background alarm going off faintly in the distance, combined with a real melancholic edge which is illustrated with its great use of violins.

The strength of Amazing Spider-Man 2 will depend on exactly how much cheese you can take with your villains. There is a line in the picture in which Peter states that his superior pays him wages that would be acceptable in 1961, that about sums up the depth of the baddies. This is contrasted with a very strong hero journey, romance and portrayal, that fundamentally make the film worth checking out, this Easter.
Good review. How would you rate it on a scale of 1-10 and how does it compare to previous Spider-Man films, especially TASM1?
 
Good review. How would you rate it on a scale of 1-10 and how does it compare to previous Spider-Man films, especially TASM1?

Thanks, I think it is far better then The Amazing Spider-Man, due to more going on, a better performance from Garfield and its final act. In terms of how it ranks with the Raimi films, I would rank it just below Spider-Man 1 and 2 respectively. I still think Raimi is a better director then Webb because of his really great ability to blend comedy and horror. This is best showcased in the first picture where you have some really campy elements but the film gets darker and more brutal as it goes along, culminating in the Spidey vs Green Goblin final fight.

There were moments in Amazing Spider-Man 2, where I was thinking, why am I not finding this sequence more horrifying or harrowing. In some cases it came down to the direction, the lighting in Harry`s transformation scene being really poor, and sometimes the campy and scary tone were at odds in the same scene. I would rate it 8/10 because despite the shortcomings of the script, the hero portrayal is pitch perfect, along with the romance and it made me feel. If a film can do that, then no matter what problems it may have, I will often overlook them because of this one reason.
 
Last edited:
Hey guys, here is my review of the film below. Overall, I really enjoyed it, despite some major problems with the screenplay at times. I was really missing the Mary Jane scenes and would have been happy to see them despite how busy the film was.

Warning Mild Spoilers Contained Within


The Amazing Spider-Man 2 in the context of the whole comic book movie genre, that has blossomed and reached it`s middle phase, represents an interesting quandary for the nature of films in the genre. The question is this, what is more important in a comic book movie, the hero or the villain? Does it matter that the ratio of good representing one of these fundamentally overshadows the other. In the case of this picture, the focus is primarily on Spider-Man and his alter-ego Peter Parker, which is a great thing. However, this comes at the expense of the villains, who for the most part feel sketchily developed.

This does not spell doom and gloom for the film, as in this case I could forgive the latter problem. This is because I thought each of the villains served the thematic elements of the screenplay and story. The main idea at play being what it really feels like to be Spider-Man. This is not only from the good aspects which come in the form of a great showcase of his web swinging and power set. But also, the personal and public perception of him, which on the one hand the villains represented.

Taking aside Rhino, who just fulfils a larger ambition of the film and turns up in what is the closest thing, the Spider-Man movies will come to a Bond pre-credits sequence. Electro, who was the weakest written, represents the negative aspect of Spidey, what his example and heroism can spur of in people, with his casual misguided qiuping. Harry Osborne, represents someone who has been rejected too, in this case his very life being denied, because Spider-Man refuses to save him. This is due to a fear of his blood been exposed to his best friend and the consequence that may come from it.

Elsewhere, the screenplay feels very packed, almost looking like it is going to physically burst sometimes scenes. There is a lot of set up with characters primed for future instalments, lurking in the background. This is coupled with a bit too many contrivances. Exactly how many creepy guys does Gwen encounter in her workplace lift, that go on to become big bads?

While watching the picture, you are almost convinced it is going to be a running joke on the part of the writers. Perhaps the worst mistake of the screenplay is with simple solution of the epicentre for all villinary and skullduggery in New York being Oscorp. It calls into question, the logic and motives of the creation of a certain team, and does not bode well for the franchise's future.

Andrew Garfield, returns as the web swinger and true believers, the impossible has happened. With just a second turn as the character, Garfield has etched himself into the upper echelon of comic book actors, that include the likes of Bale, Reeve and Jackman. For all his time in screen, Garfield represents the pinnacle of what Spider-Man should be. This comes from his comic timing, movement in the suit and all his combustible nervous energy, as Parker is endearing to watch.

Emma Stone equals Garfields acting, with fantastic comedic skills, emotional pathos and a real inner strength. Elsewhere, Dane DeHaan plays his dual role like an out of control, rock star who is on the edge of burning out and his intensity works very well in eliciting Harry with sympathy. Jamie Foxx is commendable as Electro, with a cool vocal performance and manic energy. But his pre-transformation performance, is a little unbelievable, due to the actual casting itself which is not Foxx`s fault at all. Finally, Paul Giamatti, looks like he is having a lot of fun, feeling as though his inner five year old has suddenly awakened and decided to put on a performance that even all the back row can hear.

Hans Zimmer took over scoring duties from James Horner and the result is perhaps his most experimental score to date. Teaming up with collaborators such as Pharrell Williams and Johnny Marr, Zimmer creates interesting themes, two of which stand out. The first is the Spider-Man theme which in its use of trumpets and natural film sounds, combine to create the youthful energy of the character. The second is Harry`s theme which sounds like a background alarm going off faintly in the distance, combined with a real melancholic edge which is illustrated with its great use of violins.

The strength of Amazing Spider-Man 2 will depend on exactly how much cheese you can take with your villains. There is a line in the picture in which Peter states that his superior pays him wages that would be acceptable in 1961, that about sums up the depth of the baddies. This is contrasted with a very strong hero journey, romance and portrayal, that fundamentally make the film worth checking out, this Easter.
:up: Great Review!
 
Thanks, I think it is far better then The Amazing Spider-Man, due to more going on, a better performance from Garfield and its final act. In terms of how it ranks with the Rami films, I would rank it just below Spider-Man 1 and 2 respectively. I still think Raimi is a better director then Webb because of his really great ability to blend comedy and horror, which is best showcased in the first picture where you have some really campy elements but the film gets darker and more brutal as it goes along, culminating in the Spidey vs Green Goblin final fight.

There were moments in Amazing Spider-Man 2, where I was thinking, why am I not finding this sequence more horrifying or harrowing. In some cases it came down to the direction, the lightning in Harry`s transformation scene being really poor, and sometimes the campy and scary tone at odds in the same scene. I would rate it 8/10 because despite the shortcomings of the script, the hero portrayal is pitch perfect, along with the romance and it made me feel. If a film can do that, then no matter what problems it may have, I will often overlook them because of this one reason.

I already rate TASM1 slightly higher than SM1 so I wonder how I'll place TASM2 on my list. Haha :)

8/10 sounds like a very good score though. :up:
 
I already rate TASM1 slightly higher than SM1 so I wonder how I'll place TASM2 on my list. Haha :)

8/10 sounds like a very good score though. :up:

I really hope you enjoy it and don`t believe the bad reviews, it`s really got a lot going for it. :yay:
 
Thanks, I think it is far better then The Amazing Spider-Man, due to more going on, a better performance from Garfield and its final act. In terms of how it ranks with the Rami films, I would rank it just below Spider-Man 1 and 2 respectively. I still think Raimi is a better director then Webb because of his really great ability to blend comedy and horror, which is best showcased in the first picture where you have some really campy elements but the film gets darker and more brutal as it goes along, culminating in the Spidey vs Green Goblin final fight.

There were moments in Amazing Spider-Man 2, where I was thinking, why am I not finding this sequence more horrifying or harrowing. In some cases it came down to the direction, the lightning in Harry`s transformation scene being really poor, and sometimes the campy and scary tone at odds in the same scene. I would rate it 8/10 because despite the shortcomings of the script, the hero portrayal is pitch perfect, along with the romance and it made me feel. If a film can do that, then no matter what problems it may have, I will often overlook them because of this one reason.

Welcome to the Hype SGS and thanks for the review. I'm looking rabidly forward to the US release so I can compare my reactions to those who have posted their's here.

I would disagree with you about Raimi being a better director than Webb, though of course it's entirely my opinion and viewpoint. In [500] Days of Summer and TASM, I really relate to the characters and get drawn in emotionally, and it's something I really appreciate in Webb's work. Meanwhile, I have nowhere near the same reaction to the characters in Raimi's films. I think Raimi is extremely talented and I've enjoyed some of his films, but using his 3 Spidey films and most recently Oz the Great and the Powerful as examples, I just don't invest into the characters the same way I do with Webb's characters, and to me that's just about the most important thing a director does, make the audience care about the characters in their films. I know Webb's body of work is quite a bit smaller, I'll see if the pattern holds true with TASM2.
 
I really hope you enjoy it and don`t believe the bad reviews, it`s really got a lot going for it. :yay:

Thanks, your review made me feel a lot better about this film. I see that the flaws will be there but I can look past them if I enjoy the film. STID was a flawed film (also Orci and Kurtzman) and Trekkies trashed it, but I ended up having a blast watching it. Hope the same happens here.
 
Oh also Andrew Lucas complaining about it being so brutal. I guess lizard sticking his claws through captain Stacy's stomach wasn't brutal right? They show his claws come out the other end of his back. Give me a break.:whatever:
 
I still find it funny a guy called Webb directs these Spider-Man films :funny:
 
Gwen's death was always "brutal." Haven't seen the film of course but I don't see why you're complaining so much about it, Andrew.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"