Dread
TMNT 1984-2009
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2001
- Messages
- 21,788
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Greg Rucka on PUNISHER is a good "get" for Marvel. Although if they want to keep him, especially with every creator sniffing at making their own properties now that Mark Millar has shown them how, they'll need to put him on a book that's "important".
Don't get me wrong; relaunching the non-MarvelMAX PUNISHER title with a name like Rucka is a good thing. I'd argue the "Marvel Universe" PUNISHER title has been relaunched so many times that it needed a high profile talent who hasn't been attached to Marvel in a while, if ever. But the Punisher is not a major character anymore, and hasn't been since the mid 90's. What would be ballsier would be putting Rucka on a book that "counts" more. Such as SECRET AVENGERS, although Marvel probably missed a moment to have Warren Ellis on it after Nick Spencer's drive by run. Or maybe whichever Avenger title Bendis decides to relinquish first.
That's just my opinion, of course. I imagine Sean McKeever is THRILLED to have worked for Marvel for years and never got a big book, then got signed by DC and, at the very least, was handed the keys to a C-List franchise like TEEN TITANS, and is now back at Marvel, back to doing what he usually was doing - getting attached to under-promoted books that get canned and don't sell. Again, Rucka on PUNISHER is a great start. But I see it as a start. Want to make DC really sweat? Stick him on AVENGERS. Do Marvel have the balls? They talk tough when Spider-Man has to be single again, but when it comes to the real ballsy choices, they often choose safer stocks than elderly widows with a few extra nickels. Bendis on MOON KNIGHT? Such a no brainer it is stunning it hadn't happened yet (sort of like DC "letting" Geoff Johns relaunch AQUAMAN).
Don't get me wrong; relaunching the non-MarvelMAX PUNISHER title with a name like Rucka is a good thing. I'd argue the "Marvel Universe" PUNISHER title has been relaunched so many times that it needed a high profile talent who hasn't been attached to Marvel in a while, if ever. But the Punisher is not a major character anymore, and hasn't been since the mid 90's. What would be ballsier would be putting Rucka on a book that "counts" more. Such as SECRET AVENGERS, although Marvel probably missed a moment to have Warren Ellis on it after Nick Spencer's drive by run. Or maybe whichever Avenger title Bendis decides to relinquish first.
That's just my opinion, of course. I imagine Sean McKeever is THRILLED to have worked for Marvel for years and never got a big book, then got signed by DC and, at the very least, was handed the keys to a C-List franchise like TEEN TITANS, and is now back at Marvel, back to doing what he usually was doing - getting attached to under-promoted books that get canned and don't sell. Again, Rucka on PUNISHER is a great start. But I see it as a start. Want to make DC really sweat? Stick him on AVENGERS. Do Marvel have the balls? They talk tough when Spider-Man has to be single again, but when it comes to the real ballsy choices, they often choose safer stocks than elderly widows with a few extra nickels. Bendis on MOON KNIGHT? Such a no brainer it is stunning it hadn't happened yet (sort of like DC "letting" Geoff Johns relaunch AQUAMAN).