Marvolo
Avenger
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2006
- Messages
- 47,795
- Reaction score
- 10,762
- Points
- 103
anything by horner. dude knows what he's talking about. annd Jurassic Park
Jack Horner or John R. Horner?
Last edited:
anything by horner. dude knows what he's talking about. annd Jurassic Park
Thanks.jack
For the most part Horner knows his stuff, but he is a little full of himself at times. He said himself that he requested Steven Spielberg put in the scene in The Lost World where a lookalike of Robert T. Bakker (another well known Dinosaur expert) gets eaten, because Horner has had an ongoing rivalry / feud with him over their differing (and often controversial) theories. Some of their disagreements seem downright petty to me though, like whether or not the T-Rex had motion-based vision. All we have is the thing's friggin' skull, so it's not like we know how the optical center of its brain was wired...
Also, Jack Horner is in the "T-Rex was a scavenger" camp which I do not agree with. That thing was built for running, and considering its size I doubt it was running away. When it comes to the T-Rex, little Jack Horner can go sit in his corner as far as I'm concerned.
The science behind the resonance chamber theory is very sound, and I've seen demonstrations that show it could work, but still... A biological flame thrower would be way cooler.
haha, I'm watchinjg it right now, then gonna watch JP2, and maybe JP3 if I can stomach it.Oh my God, I need to watch Jurassic Park right now, especially since it's raining.
[YT]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lf1xLpKLVZ4&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lf1xLpKLVZ4&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/YT]
Yes, because humans and dinosaurs coexisted as well, right? Or did Palin lie to me?Yep. Not only were they in seperate periods ...
ah, oh well then.
Man, I hope they figure out a way to clone dinos in our lifetime. I hope it's a long neck dino. I'd pay every cent I have to see such a creature.
Ian Malcom would rip me oneyou watched jurassic park....HAVE YOU LEARNED NOTHING!!!
t:t:t:
Dinosaurs were around for over 100 million years. I think they could take it.I've said it before, but cloning dinosaurs would be cruel. Our environment is completely different now than it was at the end of the Cretaceous, let alone the prime of the Jurassic or Triassic periods. They would quickly fall victim to various bacteria and viruses that didn't exist back then and they therefore would have no defense against them.
Dinosaurs were around for over 100 million years. I think they could take it.
no, they really couldnt. everything was different back then, the air, the water, the environment...complete 180 on what we have now.
Remember, The Dinosaurs became extinct because of a 1 in a million shot from a meteor. If it had missed, Would the Dinos STILL be around? I think they could. When the world went into a ice age, the Dinos would Migrate south...I doubt they could. Diseases have had the last 65 million years to evolve, dinosaurs haven't, and that's just the tip of the iceberg.
1. Most scientists agree, fossil records show traces of material that could come from a meteor. And there's a crater in the yukutan peninsula dated around 65 million years old.Who's to say that (1) the meteor theory is correct? (2) the Ice Age would've occurred without it?
Indeed, so instead of Humans typing on the Hype it would be Velociraptors typing on the hypeLooking at the way that dinosaurs in the Cretaceous period evolved some of the most impressive physical adaptions in the animal kingdom, I think mammals bigger than a mid-sized dog wouldn't have much of a chance. Rodents and primitive carnivores (like mustelids) would likely have been the only variety of mammal around.
For the most part Horner knows his stuff, but he is a little full of himself at times. He said himself that he requested Steven Spielberg put in the scene in The Lost World where a lookalike of Robert T. Bakker (another well known Dinosaur expert) gets eaten, because Horner has had an ongoing rivalry / feud with him over their differing (and often controversial) theories. Some of their disagreements seem downright petty to me though, like whether or not the T-Rex had motion-based vision. All we have is the thing's friggin' skull, so it's not like we know how the optical center of its brain was wired...
Also, Jack Horner is in the "T-Rex was a scavenger" camp which I do not agree with. That thing was built for running, and considering its size I doubt it was running away. When it comes to the T-Rex, little Jack Horner can go sit in his corner as far as I'm concerned.
I believe in Dinosaurs unlike some people in the world. The bones are there after all. That being said, I would piss myself silly if I saw one via Jurassic Park: Lost World walking in the street.
if Dino's ate a zombie....would it turn into a Dino-zombie...or are Dino's too smart to eat Zombies?
I disagree with Horner as well with regard to the T-rex scavenger theory, but I think Bakker is more of a showboater than Horner overall.
BTW, I hate the current paleo-artists' trend of sticking hypothetical feathers on every single theropod dinosaur reconstruction these days. Sure, there have been fossils of feather imprints or nodes which might have held feathers on certain smaller dinos, but that doesn't mean every slender bipedal carnivore had them.