The hunt is on for Jerzon Senador

:funny: Well I thank you for being so classy and only going as far to call my opinion "stupid." At least you didn't call it ignorant.

And what exactly have you seen? You're probably around 16 years old. And that's not an insult. I can tell by your "opinions" on things. Michael Vick murdered dogs for a disgusting and sadistic sport. Anyone that defends it is likely a teenager trying to be cool.

And just because it's your opinion, doesn't always mean that it's not completely ridiculous.

On the contrary, we watch humans beat each other up on TV. Who, in a lot of cases, end up with health issues down the road, died, or been held up in a hospital for weeks to months. A lot of those dogs were brought up JUST to fight. Their sole purpose to fight each other. While, I think it's wrong and I'd personally never do it, I don't see it as a pressing issue.
 
On the contrary, we watch humans beat each other up on TV. Who, in a lot of cases, end up with health issues down the road, died, or been held up in a hospital for weeks to months. A lot of those dogs were brought up JUST to fight. Their sole purpose to fight each other. While, I think it's wrong and I'd personally never do it, I don't see it as a pressing issue.
Good lord. Do I really need to explain to you the difference or are you that desperate to defend animal cruelty?


Alright, like I said, it's wrong and should have never been done. Do you want to lead a charge over there and stone him or something? They'll prosecute him and if they don't, they don't. Worse has been done dude. You guys are overreacting at TheIncredibleS's opinion.
:facepalm: Yes. Michael Vick shouldn't have suffered any punishment for murdering and slaying dogs. All because worse has happened. And no one is getting out of hand. You're the one getting defensive and trying to defend Vick.

No one said anything about stoning him. And no one said Michael Vick deserved 10 years. All of those things. You said.
 
:funny: Well I thank you for being so classy and only going as far to call my opinion "stupid." At least you didn't call it ignorant.

And what exactly have you seen? You're probably around 16 years old. And that's not an insult. I can tell by your "opinions" on things. Michael Vick murdered dogs for a disgusting and sadistic sport. Anyone that defends it is likely a teenager trying to be cool.

And just because it's your opinion, doesn't always mean that it's not completely ridiculous.
:whatever: Sigh. I am 16. I am young. I also think your opinion is ridiculous.I live in the murder capitol of The United States. I hear people dieing every day on the news. A 1 year old was shot in the head and died a few months back. Thats just the tip of the ice berg in New Orleans. Thats many more messed of things about this city. I stayed during during Katrina. I don't wanna go into that but I saw many dead bodies and other stuff that you can even imagine. So excuse if I dont give a **** about a dog. When I hear and see humans dieing every day. Im sorry if you think my opinion is ridiculous. I wasn't trying to be classy when you kept calling me ignorant when in all honesty I don't think you know how to use the word. Ignorance:Lack of knowledge. I may be young but don't call me ignorant when I never in this thread showed lack of knowledge. :dry:
 
Good lord. Do I really need to explain to you the difference or are you that desperate to defend animal cruelty?


:facepalm: Yes. Michael Vick shouldn't have suffered any punishment for murdering and slaying dogs. All because worse has happened. And no one is getting out of hand. You're the one getting defensive and trying to defend Vick.

No one said anything about stoning him. And no one said Michael Vick deserved 10 years. All of those things. You said.
You as well as I know that many animal rights activist were calling for his head.
 
:whatever: Sigh. I am 16.
:funny: You do realize that it's no coincidence I guessed your age correctly, right?
When I hear and see humans dieing every day. Im sorry if you think my opinion is ridiculous. I wasn't trying to be classy when you kept calling me ignorant when in all honesty I don't think you know how to use the word. Ignorance:Lack of knowledge. I may be young but don't call me ignorant when I never in this thread showed lack of knowledge. :dry:
You certainly lack knowledge in this situation. You're giving the opinion of an impressionable child. You don't want to acknowledge the murdering of dogs in a pointless sport, because you saw on the news that a human being was murdered? That isn't the logic of someone that's knowledgeable. That's the logic of a young and impressionable child.

Many people grew up in rough neighborhoods, not just you. It doesn't make you tough or have to be insensitive to disgusting acts of violence. Michael Vick didn't spend time in jail for his skin color, or because he was an NFL star. It was because he commited a crime that warranted it. You sound an impressionable teenager who hears his parents/friends discussing this, and decided to jump on board.

I know by the same way I knew your age. Mainly because you aren't giving me your opinion. It's your friends/parents. You can't refute anything I say. All you can spout out is "Worse things have happened!" or "It was just a dog!". You don't really feel this way, you're just told too.

You as well as I know that many animal rights activist were calling for his head.
And yet, it has nothing to do with whether or not he deserved to spend time in jail. I don't care what morons were calling for his head, it's irrelevant. He deserved to be punished, maybe not to the extent of that some of the Animal Rights Activist's wanted, but to some extent he did.
 
Last edited:
:funny: You do realize that it's no coincidence I guessed your age correctly, right?You certainly lack knowledge in this situation. You're giving the opinion of an impressionable child. You don't want to acknowledge the murdering of dogs in a pointless sport, because you saw on the news that a human being was murdered? That isn't the logic of someone that's knowledgeable. That's the logic of a young and impressionable child.

Many people grew up in rough neighborhoods, not just you. It doesn't make you tough or have to be insensitive to disgusting acts of violence. Michael Vick didn't spend time in jail for his skin color, or because he was an NFL star. It was because he committed a crime that warranted it. You sound an impressionable teenager who hears his parents/friends discussing this, and decided to jump on board.

I know by the same way I knew your age. Mainly because you aren't giving me your opinion. It's your friends/parents. You can't refute anything I say. All you can spout out is "Worse things have happened!" or "It was just a dog!". You don't really feel this way, you're just told too.

And yet, it has nothing to do with whether or not he deserved to spend time in jail. I don't care what morons were calling for his head, it's irrelevant. He deserved to be punished, maybe not to the extent of some Animal Rights Activist, but to some extent he did.
:pal:You don't know me so you don't know what goes on in my head. Also my parents don't talk about this and neither do my friends. I came to this conclusion on my own.Cause I can think for myself. If I'd listen to my friends I'd be homophobic person but im not. If I'd listen to my friends I would have smoke weed but I dont. I think you get what im saying. Don't act like you know a person on the internet just because you guess their age. Good for you. Want a cookie? But im done debating you. I mean its pointless since you know me so well.I was gonna say more but you know me so well that theirs no point. :o Also how do I lack knowledge oh wise one? You tell me about myself since you know me please? The Murdering of dogs is pointless but it should be a crime but Michael Vick got punished way too harsh. They made a example out of him.
 
If your friends are homophobic then you need to do a better job at picking them.

And lastly, the reason that you're done is because you can't refute any of the points that I made. Mainly because you're still just a child.
 
Also my opinion has always been that I don't care that much about dogs in the first place. I never did "defend" Vick. I said he should get punished because his crimes were agaisnt the law. My point was that I think that Vick got punished far too harsh. Also Anybody who defends Vick is a teenager? Dude stop. I know many a people that defended Vick more than I am doing and these are grown men. But I also know that your about to say that is where I was told and I just listened to them and went with what they say. But here is the difference between me and a dog. I don't have a owner or a person who tells me what to think. I spent much time on the internet researching the issue. I came to my conclusion for the simple fact that it bother me. I'v seen the dogs Vick hurt and I felt sad but not at the point where I felt a man should lose his career, his wealth, and two years of his life over it. It was sad but in the back of my mind was the simple fact that it was a dog. I see people say what Vick did was barbaric and inhuman. But really was it? I don't even think it's sadistic. Vick was raised in that culture. That was all he knew. He thought that was ok and in his culture it was. You can say the culture is wrong but that got passed along for generations. Many people think thats ok. I don't think that should happen and you should be punished for it. But to me, I wouldn't send people to jail for it. I'd send them to therapy. Where they can get help to unroot their culture. You would have Vick better than any prison would have help him. Yeah maybe he doesn't fight does anymore. But he probably doesn't think it he should have loss so much over dogs. This would have helped him realize his problem and help him grow as a man. That would have been a much better punishment than what Vick got. Now this "child" has just given you a counter argument.
 
Last edited:
Also my parents don't talk about this and neither do my friends. I came to this conclusion on my own.Cause I can think for myself.
Also my opinion has always been that I don't care that much about dogs in the first place. I never did "defend" Vick. I said he should get punished because his crimes were agaisnt the law. My point was that I think that Vick got punished far too harsh. Also Anybody who defends Vick is a teenager? Dude stop. I know many a people that defended Vick more than I am doing and these are grown men. But I also know that your about to say that is where I was told and I just listened to them and went with what they say.
You still didn't refute that point. Why did you lie? To hide the fact that you're still an impressionable teenager and don't have a real opinion on this matter?

I'v seen the dogs Vick hurt and I felt sad but not at the point where I felt a man should lose his career, his wealth, and two years of his life over it.
He chose to get himself involved in illegal dog fighting. He knew what he was getting into and the risks that he was taking. He didn't need the money because as you even acknowledge, he was a wealthy NFL star.

He put himself in jail. If you don't feel that he did, then who's fault was it?

Again, not an insult. I am truly questioning if I was I wrong about you being 16. I'm beginning to think you lied by a couple of years. You lied earlier, so it wouldn't be that big of a shock anyway. You might as well admit it.

It was sad but in the back of my mind was the simple fact that it was a dog. I see people say what Vick did was barbaric and inhuman. But really was it? I don't even think it's sadistic. Vick was raised in that culture. That was all he knew. He thought that was ok and in his culture it was.
Yes. Drowning a dog with your bare hands is sadistic and it's certainly barbaric. Same with electrocuting them.

And the simple fact as you like to put it; Is that dogs have feelings too. It's not about comparing them to humans. No one is trying to value a dogs life more than a humans.

Vick was raised in that culture. That was all he knew. He thought that was ok and in his culture it was. You can say the culture is wrong but that got passed along for generations. Many people think thats ok. I don't think that should happen and you should be punished for it. But to me, I wouldn't send people to jail for it. I'd send them to therapy.
:facepalm: Michael Vick had been pampered all of his life. And he had extra protection in prison due to his high profile. And I'd be willing to bet some extra perks. So boo hoo if he has to go from his mansion to a cell. It was his own doing.

Now this "child" has just given you a counter argument
A horrible one. One that reeks of 14 years old and trying to be "cool". Or one that reeks of "troll". Truthfully, I'm hoping it's the latter.
 
I'm pretty sure it's a fact that you don't know $#!t when you're 16. Anyone that's made it a few years past that age can attest to that.
 
I dont think he deserves "Justice", unless the dog died...

That being said, kid's a tool, and shouldnt **** with cute little dogs. **** that kid. He wont get any sex for a while.

That will be his justice.
 
I'm pretty sure it's a fact that you don't know $#!t when you're 16. Anyone that's made it a few years past that age can attest to that.
I think that's true. 15-years old here, and I'm still pretty immature. :whatever: But at least I can admit that.

EDIT: And I'm Filipino... adding to the already-severe disappointment in Mr. Senador.
 
I'm pretty sure it's a fact that you don't know**** when you're 16. Anyone that's made it a few years past that age can attest to that.
:up: You couldn't be more right. It's the reason that I knew his age.
 
:up: You couldn't be more right. It's the reason that I knew his age.

Now that's not to be confused with me saying you can't form sentences and exhibit some forms of rationale... but generally you don't know d*ck. The real sad part of it is that you don't realize it until years later.
 
Now that's not to be confused with me saying you can't form sentences and exhibit some forms of rationale... but generally you don't know ****. The real sad part of it is that you don't realize it until years later.
If you're 16 and are aware of this, then you certainly have a good head on your shoulders. :up:
 
Recognizing that you don't know anything doesn't make you more informed, or level headed. It just means you're resigning to the fact, is all. :cwink:
 
Recognizing that you don't know anything doesn't make you more informed, or level headed. It just means you're resigning to the fact, is all. :cwink:
But at least he acknowledges it. Nothing more annoying then a teenager trying to act mature.
 
What makes a dog better a cow? Or a lamb? Or a pig? A dog might be mans best friend but their still animals. And in some parts of the world their eaten just like those animals. A animal is animal. No matter if its pet or livestock.
Even if this was true (and it isn't) it still doesn't excuse cruelty.
 
I dont think he deserves "Justice", unless the dog died...

That being said, kid's a tool, and shouldnt **** with cute little dogs. **** that kid. He wont get any sex for a while.

That will be his justice.
Penis assassination.
 
Not good enuff, Wolf. I say he be tied down and forced to watch his GF/Crush/lady of his dreams loving on the puppy he wronged.
 
Eh...I don't know about jailtime for this idiot. He definitely doesn't deserve to have a dog. Maybe community service at a dog shelter would be the best punishment.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"