The Incredible Hulk CGI Thread

hulk design

  • tv series

  • ang lee's

  • comics


Results are only viewable after voting.
One thing I wish people would stop doing is posting that image of the Ang Hulk. I didn't like the shots of him coming out of the San Francisco sewers. For me, the best shots in the last film were of him battling the Hulk dogs, which coincidentally was a night time fight like the superb shots in the trailer.
 
One thing I wish people would stop doing is posting that image of the Ang Hulk. I didn't like the shots of him coming out of the San Francisco sewers. For me, the best shots in the last film were of him battling the Hulk dogs, which coincidentally was a night time fight like the superb shots in the trailer.

100% agree with you.
 
you mean neon green dough boy. :woot:
Seriously, though, the new design for this character (and what limited glimpse of animation we've seen) pale in comparison to Ang Lee's effort. This new Hulk looks dehydrated; if he were a professional boxer, we'd say he looked "weight-drained" - which often leads to being on the wrong end of a solid ass-whooping.
 
One thing I wish people would stop doing is posting that image of the Ang Hulk. I didn't like the shots of him coming out of the San Francisco sewers. For me, the best shots in the last film were of him battling the Hulk dogs, which coincidentally was a night time fight like the superb shots in the trailer.
The most "realistic" looking shot in Ang's film was the Hulk-roar that transpired just after Hulk's escape from that water tank they had him in.

Another, albeit minor, moment that stands out in my memory is the animation for a small snippet of action towards the end of Hulk's rampage in San Francisco. He turns towards a helicopter, ready to throw a large rock or chunk of concrete at it, only to pause upon the sight of Betty Ross. The skin, the muscle underneath, the grime, the moisture, the movement - the character looked absolutely real.
 
Seriously, though, the new design for this character (and what limited glimpse of animation we've seen) pale in comparison to Ang Lee's effort. This new Hulk looks dehydrated; if he were a professional boxer, we'd say he looked "weight-drained" - which often leads to being on the wrong end of a solid ass-whooping.

Great points... but this is a mutated monster which can supposedly leap miles, can lift up cars like they were nothing,etc. Weight Draining logic does not apply here. :oldrazz:

Just as I felt they didn't need to apply in Ang's.
 
Seriously, though, the new design for this character (and what limited glimpse of animation we've seen) pale in comparison to Ang Lee's effort. This new Hulk looks dehydrated; if he were a professional boxer, we'd say he looked "weight-drained" - which often leads to being on the wrong end of a solid ass-whooping.


i don't know what trailer you saw ? but the new hulk design is perfect in my opinion. besides they aren't done with final cgi yet.
 
Great points... but this is a mutated monster which can supposedly leap miles, can lift up cars like they were nothing,etc. Weight Draining logic does not apply here. :oldrazz:

Just as I felt they didn't need to apply in Ang's.
I was just speaking to the design of the character. The '03/'08 Hulk fight statement was mostly facetious.
 
Ok...Well to clarify, it certainly was not my intent to 'discredit' those guys and you shouldn't have been so quick to go assuming it was. I've looked over my original post again and there's nothing there but a simple observation. Tell me, do you think that observation is wrong?

you're right...i shouldn't have been assuming, but even observations can be tools used by someone with an agenda. when i first read your post, it kind of came off that way. i understand that getting wrapped up in one thing without having a break can be (and in most instances IS) a hindrance but the opinions of the people on the link i posted obviously aren't slaving away on one of their projects. the general audience plays an important role just as the fx artists. once again...apologies.

One thing I wish people would stop doing is posting that image of the Ang Hulk.
agreed! that's one of the worst images from Ang's Hulk imo.
 
unfortunately, you're right. they will...

...i remember you telling me you're taking up a 3D course. hope that's going will for you.



agreed...even though i prefer Ang's Hulk, i'm not totally blowing this one off. i love that he's more ripped and i want to see him in differently lighting and circumstances before i form a solid opinion.
a 3d class? school?
you mixed me for someone else :hehe:
 
I was just speaking to the design of the character. The '03/'08 Hulk fight statement was mostly facetious.

I knew that. :oldrazz: About the statement I mean.

I am saying that the design doesn't have to follow real world logic, he could be a twig with no muscle mass at all that anyone of us could beat the loving **** out of (of course he wouldn't be the Hulk then) but in movie land that twig could do anything to anyone.

Isn't non-reality grand?
 
to all those who are complaining about how the hulk looks, design it yourself and post photos online so we can judge your designs.
 
to all those who are complaining about how the hulk looks, design it yourself and post photos online so we can judge your designs.
in all this time on this forum this is what i call a ''clasic''.
a smart post.or maybe not?

look give me 1 year,a budget over 150 milions,a good team,director and of course a good CGI team. and i will give you a nice hulk shot.

or whait a minute. did you expect that a guy at hes home with a normal computer will do what over 50 people did with a budget of 150 milions and time over 6 months?
 
to all those who are complaining about how the hulk looks, design it yourself and post photos online so we can judge your designs.

:whatever:

not everyone here has the ability to produce the image that they imagine.
 
So what makes you think you know what good design is? Because you read poorly drawn comics? This Hulk, as far as CGI goes, is amazing and it's not even finished. if anything looked fake in that trailer it was Abomination running. He seemed to have to weight when he was in stride.

in all this time on this forum this is what i call a ''clasic''.
a smart post.or maybe not?

look give me 1 year,a budget over 150 milions,a good team,director and of course a good CGI team. and i will give you a nice hulk shot.

or whait a minute. did you expect that a guy at hes home with a normal computer will do what over 50 people did with a budget of 150 milions and time over 6 months?

You know they didn't spend $150 Million on CGI correct?

A lot of you guys act like you're in the business and that you could do a better job. Give me a break, you have no idea what goes into these designs. They don't just whip something out on a computer. They know what they're doing, you don't. Stop acting like it. You can ***** and moan all you want, but fact is they're making the movie and you aren't.
 
to all those who are complaining about how the hulk looks, design it yourself and post photos online so we can judge your designs.
lol, it's amusing when people use this argument.
It's absurd.

You don't have to have animated realistic dinosaurs to know that the ones in Jurassic Park look more real than the ones in Land of the Lost.

You don't have to be as good at basketball as Michael Jordan is to know that he's a better player than Timmy McStevenson.

You don't have to be a good actor to know that Tara Reid is a bad actress and that Al Pacino is a good actor.

You don't have to have written and directed an exciting Space Opera to know that Star Wars is more visually exciting than 2001: A Space Odyssey.


Furthermore, people have done their own designs in cases like this before, just for fun.

I'm thinking of, back before The Fantastic Four came out...true fans of the Thing thought it was lame that the movie Thing had no big ape unibrow.
So, I can't remember who, made this:

TheRealThingCostume.jpg



Which looks SO much better than this:

140x105.jpg




But, it's irrelevant.
The filmmakers aren't going to use someone else's design, and a fan's superior design is not going to make the movie version look better....so, a really pointless thing to say.
 
It was pretty bad... but the movie still did well for itself which proves everyone NOT going on these types of forums (which are composed of roughly 1% of movie goers,) didn't give a rats behind.

More like .001%. We're not even a blip on the box office radar. And everyone who mentioned the new Hulks nipples should explain why they noticed that. Unless you're a chick or gay, that shouldn't register. And for those who still bring that up, you're just trying to find SOMETHING wrong with the new model. Let's wait and see if they clean it up a la Iron Man. Hell, the Hulks shouldn't be compared til the new movie comes out anyways.
 
This whole argument is pointless. It's a subjective matter. It's like arguing over why a comic book artist is/isn't good or why you love/hate a certain painting. Some people like it, some people don't. It is what it is. You can post a 7 mile long bulleted list with technical jargon citing sources from industry standard literature and expert opinions and all that other mumbo jumbo all day long, but you're never going to change the way people see something. Just agree to disagree and move on.
 
It's not pointless. People like to express their opinions. It's a huge part of what message boards are for.
You say, "I like PIZZA!"
And someone else says, "Me too!"
And you go, "Cool!"
And then someone else says, "PIZZA is gross."
And you go, "WHAT?!?"

If expressing your opinion is pointless because you can't make someone else share your opinion, then it's no more pointless than telling a bunch of people who want to state their opinion, that stating their opinion is pointless. :o
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,357
Messages
22,090,873
Members
45,886
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"