Superman Returns The KID.....merged threads

[Nivek]

Its a new Superman movie, that uses some elements established in the original Superman movies.

Think along the lines if a new Superman comic that uses some basic or populer stuff established from the previous run, but is starting a new continuity. It's not all that hard to understand, but when it's a film using the same concept, people are allowing themselves to be easily confused with the words like sequel, remake, or Revamp. It's just a new movie.

As for the kid, AS STATED BY SINGER HIMSELF IN PRINT, the kid is Richards! No Superman 2, so throw that out the window for now. This isn't fan guesswork when the people who made the movie are giving you the information.

 

[NotFadeAway]

So Im geussing we will get Zod again in the sequel!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Kane]

Based on the SR novel, and whats forming in space......Im pretty sure the next Supervillian wont be Zod...but a different intelligence.

 

[Cinemaman]

Based on the SR novel, and whats forming in space......Im pretty sure the next Supervillian wont be Zod...but a different intelligence.

I hope we will get Brainiac

 

[ultimatefan]

As for the kid, the novelization approach sounds interesting... Leave it in the open if the kid is Clark´s or not, to end it with a strong relationship between the kid and Richard, take the high road... Of course the novelization isn´t necessarily what´s in the movie, but Iike that idea...

 

[Cinemaman]

As for the kid, the novelization approach sounds interesting... Leave it in the open if the kid is Clark´s or not, to end it with a strong relationship between the kid and Richard, take the high road... Of course the novelization isn´t necessarily what´s in the movie, but Iike that idea...

I have realized that Kid isn't so bad in this movie. He is even more serious probation for Superman than any of supervillians.

 

[dark_b]

didnt enigma said that the kid will have telepatic powers?

 

[Nivek]

didnt enigma said that the kid will have telepatic powers?

enigma said alot of things...

 

[dark_b]

you think that enigma didnt tell the truth? afterall he gave us a lot of pics.

i am thankfull for all pics.

 

[Nivek]

Well, the guy disappeared from here a while ago. Who knows what his deal was. No harsh feelings.

 

[Enigma2k]

didnt enigma said that the kid will have telepatic powers?

I stand by everything I said.

 

[M.E.H.Z.E.B]

I stand by everything I said.

Good to see you back to your confident, self-assuring self Enigma2K.

 

[dark_b]

I stand by everything I said.

nice to see you back

yeah i belive you. afterall we are talking here about singer. i am still 100% sure that teh novel book is different than the movie.

expect to be suprised

 

[hoopy3]

Its a new Superman movie, that uses some elements established in the original Superman movies.

Think along the lines if a new Superman comic that uses some basic or populer stuff established from the previous run, but is starting a new continuity. It's not all that hard to understand, but when it's a film using the same concept, people are allowing themselves to be easily confused with the words like sequel, remake, or Revamp. It's just a new movie.

As for the kid, AS STATED BY SINGER HIMSELF IN PRINT, the kid is Richards! No Superman 2, so throw that out the window for now. This isn't fan guesswork when the people who made the movie are giving you the information.

I did totally agree with you, but after reading the book, there are 2 definite references to superman 2...just nothing about the villains

 

[Batman the 6th]

The kid has telepathic powers?

 

[JamalYIgle]

From an interview with Bryan from Los Angeles City beat:

How will hardcore comic-book fans react to disruptions in the traditional Superman storyline like Lois’s child and other updated tweaks?

“I like to think they’ll appreciate [the modern touches],” says Singer. “There are always some fans that will have a very strict interpretation of what a movie should be, and perhaps they’ll only find parts of it that they will respond to. There are very few true, insurmountable obstacles for Superman, and frankly, on a personal level, the child is a huge obstacle for him to reconcile.”

 

[Jakomus]

I'm glad they're leaving it vague about who the child belongs to (if the novel is truthful). Enables the sequel to be a lot easier to make.