A new posters and two clips.
http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/11/24...ely-bones-new-poster-and-two-new-video-clips/
http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/11/24...ely-bones-new-poster-and-two-new-video-clips/
Judging by the reviews the film is drastically different from the book, which is good news for Peter Jackson. I was in fear for his career. If he had been faithful to the book no one would ever watch his movies again for fear of slipping into a coma during one of his films.
Judging by the reviews the film is drastically different from the book, which is good news for Peter Jackson. I was in fear for his career. If he had been faithful to the book no one would ever watch his movies again for fear of slipping into a coma during one of his films.
What's wrong with the book that being more faithful would hurt the film?
But it sounds like he [BLACKOUT]cut a lot of the rape and the actual death.[/BLACKOUT] If he really did he's taken away the emotional punch of the book.
Can someone post that pic in HQ?
![]()
Can someone post that pic in HQ?
![]()
Then they probably shouldn't have kept the same title of the book if it's not based on the book.
It was the most brutal part of the book, but the biggest emotional punches came from everything that happened after. I read that the most brutal aspects of that scene are not in the film - honestly, they don't need to be. According to the article I read Stanley Tucci and Saoirse Ronan (as well as her parents) were apprehensive about filming that scene, and it was kept to stay within the PG-13 rating.
I didn't know that about Sebold. That's really sad. We just had two similar incidents near my campus.
I should probably attempt to reread the book in the future. Or try and sit through the movie (with lots of tissues handy).
Anything with [blackout]animals dying is usually upsetting[/blackout].
???Can someone post that pic in HQ?
![]()