The Mist

Rate the film! 10=best 1=worst

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.
The one of the light coming out of the hood of a snow coat was from the Shining I believe. :)

No that was the Thing, cover. It was a nice little touch.

I got to say I was really pleased with the movie, the casting was pretty good, and the ending although different from the book, it was great! Very refreshing to see a movie do what it did.

The only complaint was the CG, I wish they would have spent more time on the CG many of the scene looked very scifi channel caliber they could have done a lot better.
 
Yes, this film was quite good. Tom Jane is a very enjoyable actor. Marcia Gay-Harden and Andre Braugher were also quite good.

Quite qood. Quite good indeed.








Quite good.
 
You know its one of those films that the longer it sinks in, the more you just wanna see it again. Doesn't hurt I'm writing my paper on it right now :up:
 
For only 17 million dollars, I'd say the CGI was pretty good. At least the effects for the spiders anyway..

I think it performed poorly because #1, it was rated R, and #2, there were no big, bankable stars...and #3, a lot of people just thought it was another "Fog" movie.

-TNC
 
For only 17 million dollars, I'd say the CGI was pretty good. At least the effects for the spiders anyway..

I think it performed poorly because #1, it was rated R, and #2, there were no big, bankable stars...and #3, a lot of people just thought it was another "Fog" movie.

-TNC
And they had a big disney family movie out also.
 
It isn't playing within 70 miles of me :(

So I can't see it.
 
I liked the film right up until the end... yet after I thought about it ( and discussed it) the ending was very fitting.
 
For only 17 million dollars, I'd say the CGI was pretty good. At least the effects for the spiders anyway..


The 3d designs were awesome of all the creatures, especially the spiders and those really huge ones, it was the tentical scene that I didnt like mainly because the lighting was off, but like you said for 17mil it was pretty good.
 
Yeah, the tentacles were my only issue, actually. But really, Darabont doesn't do SFX... Shawshank and Green Mile were relatively "reality" movies, so this is really a new thing for him. He's never made a creature-feature before.

But here's a question: How does The Mist rank with Shawshank and Green Mile?

Hell... I'll say it's the best for the time being. I might change my mind, but this one is making me think alot more.. I cant stop thinking about it.

Maybe:

1. The Mist
2. Shawshank
3. Green Mile

I might change my mind....
 
Yeah, the tentacles were my only issue, actually. But really, Darabont doesn't do SFX... Shawshank and Green Mile were relatively "reality" movies, so this is really a new thing for him. He's never made a creature-feature before.

But here's a question: How does The Mist rank with Shawshank and Green Mile?

Hell... I'll say it's the best for the time being. I might change my mind, but this one is making me think alot more.. I cant stop thinking about it.

Maybe:

1. The Mist
2. Shawshank
3. Green Mile

I might change my mind....

I would switch it to
1. Shawshank
2. The Mist
3. Green Mile (still havent seen it so as default it goes to 3)

Shawshank overall didn't suffer from any short comings, great cast, great acting, musical score, story, so on and so on.

Now that I brought it up there were a few minor issues with the musical score near the end of the film, but thats just me being nit picking. There was one point it abruptly stopped then started back up. I would go into more detail but dont want to spoil anything, for those who havent seen it yet.
 
It'd go in order that he made them for me, but thats like comparing snickers to milky way, it's all chocolaty goodness
 
Not doubting you, it's just been awhile since I read The Mist. How was that one connected to The Dark Tower Series?


It's been a while since I read the page version of The Mist- but there are a few connections and the movie piled them on even more.

The most noticable aspect of it is that the creatures are those from the Dark Tower world. The flying pteranodon like creatures are seen along with a wealth of other insane organisms near the end of the Dark Tower 3: The Wastelands.

The most important aspect of it, though, is that of the multiple endless dimensions all linked together through The Dark Tower. In the Dark Tower, Roland gains access to different dimensions through actual doorways, though it's clear there are many other ways to bridge the dimensions. This is what happens in the Mist. Like the soldier explains and Carmody says after- they tried to create a window, but what if it was a door? The Mist is indeed a doorway, branching the main world of the Dark Tower universe with that of one of the other countless worlds- a world much closer to our own.

There were other little things here and there. I got a real "thinny" vibe from the tentacles, and the thinny is a massive indescribable being with a bunch of tentacles that makes an appearance in Wastlelands alongside all the other creatures and kills an assload of people in DT4: Wizard & Glass.

Also tied together with another DT connected book, From A Buick 8. Thinking about it now, From A Buick 8 is basically the same exact story as The Mist, but longer and not as good. In it, a car is left behind by one of the agents of the Dark Tower, and this car also serves as a doorway between the main DT world and again, a world not different from our own. From this car creatures pop out(in fact, I'm pretty sure one of the pterodactyl things makes an appearance here as well), characters react differently to it, crazy stuff happens. But the biggest CONNECTION from it is that WHEN the creatures come out into our world and die, they fizzle into nothing just like the dead severed tentacle did... thus leaving no proof to those skepticle.

My favorite connection was the Wizard of Oz line. It works on it's own in context to the film- they are basically transported just like Dorothy into another world in The Mist(through a doorway no less, but for Dorothy it's a Tornado, for the Buick guys it's a car, for Roland and the Dark Tower fellows it's an actual door, and for David and the supermarket patrons it's The Mist). But any Dark Tower reader knows the importance of the Wizard of Oz in Wizard & Glass, my favorite book of the series.

And finally this all culminates in the inclusion of the painting at the beginning- the tip of the hat acknowledging just how much it all really is connected, and that this entire film is about a doorway, about one of the endless stories that can be told when ordinary people are faced with extradorinary circumstances, and how they break down when coming in contact with something out of this world.


In a perfect land, everyone who made a King story would put in these little details- but outside of a soup kitchen in the recent Salem's Lot miniseries and the same types of soda in Kingdom Hospital, people just don't seem to care. Damn shame... could you imagine how great Hearts in Atlantis would have been if they had stuck to the damn book? Talk about a sense of wonder. Of course, in a perfect world, Frank Daranbont would be the only man making King stories, and we'd all live forever until he finished the whole damn thing.
 
Yeah, the tentacles were my only issue, actually. But really, Darabont doesn't do SFX... Shawshank and Green Mile were relatively "reality" movies, so this is really a new thing for him. He's never made a creature-feature before.

But here's a question: How does The Mist rank with Shawshank and Green Mile?

Hell... I'll say it's the best for the time being. I might change my mind, but this one is making me think alot more.. I cant stop thinking about it.

Maybe:

1. The Mist
2. Shawshank
3. Green Mile

I might change my mind....
For me, The Mist was too different to rank with the other two. The Mist for me was a monster movie and that puts it in a differnt class of film. I'd lump it with Cujo or Dreamcathers because there were monsters of a sort in it.

Shawshank isn't even scary, it' wasn't that kind of film.

Green Mile was sorta scary. but it was more about the guys than it was about trying to frighten the viewer.


I thought all three movies were great but for different reasons.
 
Guys would I be ****ed up if i watched the movie on a bootleg?
 
It's been a while since I read the page version of The Mist- but there are a few connections and the movie piled them on even more.

The most noticable aspect of it is that the creatures are those from the Dark Tower world. The flying pteranodon like creatures are seen along with a wealth of other insane organisms near the end of the Dark Tower 3: The Wastelands.

The most important aspect of it, though, is that of the multiple endless dimensions all linked together through The Dark Tower. In the Dark Tower, Roland gains access to different dimensions through actual doorways, though it's clear there are many other ways to bridge the dimensions. This is what happens in the Mist. Like the soldier explains and Carmody says after- they tried to create a window, but what if it was a door? The Mist is indeed a doorway, branching the main world of the Dark Tower universe with that of one of the other countless worlds- a world much closer to our own.

There were other little things here and there. I got a real "thinny" vibe from the tentacles, and the thinny is a massive indescribable being with a bunch of tentacles that makes an appearance in Wastlelands alongside all the other creatures and kills an assload of people in DT4: Wizard & Glass.

Also tied together with another DT connected book, From A Buick 8. Thinking about it now, From A Buick 8 is basically the same exact story as The Mist, but longer and not as good. In it, a car is left behind by one of the agents of the Dark Tower, and this car also serves as a doorway between the main DT world and again, a world not different from our own. From this car creatures pop out(in fact, I'm pretty sure one of the pterodactyl things makes an appearance here as well), characters react differently to it, crazy stuff happens. But the biggest CONNECTION from it is that WHEN the creatures come out into our world and die, they fizzle into nothing just like the dead severed tentacle did... thus leaving no proof to those skepticle.

My favorite connection was the Wizard of Oz line. It works on it's own in context to the film- they are basically transported just like Dorothy into another world in The Mist(through a doorway no less, but for Dorothy it's a Tornado, for the Buick guys it's a car, for Roland and the Dark Tower fellows it's an actual door, and for David and the supermarket patrons it's The Mist). But any Dark Tower reader knows the importance of the Wizard of Oz in Wizard & Glass, my favorite book of the series.

And finally this all culminates in the inclusion of the painting at the beginning- the tip of the hat acknowledging just how much it all really is connected, and that this entire film is about a doorway, about one of the endless stories that can be told when ordinary people are faced with extradorinary circumstances, and how they break down when coming in contact with something out of this world.


In a perfect land, everyone who made a King story would put in these little details- but outside of a soup kitchen in the recent Salem's Lot miniseries and the same types of soda in Kingdom Hospital, people just don't seem to care. Damn shame... could you imagine how great Hearts in Atlantis would have been if they had stuck to the damn book? Talk about a sense of wonder. Of course, in a perfect world, Frank Daranbont would be the only man making King stories, and we'd all live forever until he finished the whole damn thing.

So could the mist and the creatures coming through it, including the storm, be caused by a "thinny"?

---Morzan
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"