ThePoisonPuppet
Civilian
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
- Messages
- 318
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 11
Well me and my friends have had a debate going since pretty much the movie came out about weather or not we would have burned the money or kept it, or even if what the Joker did was the "coolest" thing to do.
Personally, while I understand The Joker's point, I still would have kept the money just because I don't see who is going to find that burnt money anyways and all he was really doing was showing The Chechnyan how crazy he is and killing Lau in a creative/ironic way.
So which one would you do you think is more important? Money or the message? And I don't just mean in the circumstances of the Joker though its fine to explain yourself that way.
On another note on this scene, since the mobsters were either all gone or dead when the Joker burnt his half did he keep the mob's half as well? If thats the case isn't only burning half the money thats yours only sending out half the message then?
Personally, while I understand The Joker's point, I still would have kept the money just because I don't see who is going to find that burnt money anyways and all he was really doing was showing The Chechnyan how crazy he is and killing Lau in a creative/ironic way.
So which one would you do you think is more important? Money or the message? And I don't just mean in the circumstances of the Joker though its fine to explain yourself that way.
On another note on this scene, since the mobsters were either all gone or dead when the Joker burnt his half did he keep the mob's half as well? If thats the case isn't only burning half the money thats yours only sending out half the message then?
Last edited: