Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]497837[/split]
Or perhaps.....some people who post on the internet for profit will say anything to get people to click on to their site.
@C.Lee I don't that is the case here. Sneider has had a pretty good track record in the past.
His past scoops.RE: Liam James
![]()
In this picture, I actually thought he looked the oldest of any of them. I think it's because he has such a strong jaw, but when I first saw the article I assumed he was in his early 20s. Asa and Holland seem the most believable as 15 year olds (honestly, Holland might be able to pull off 13 or 14 and I don't think I'd bat an eye).
What are you basing this on?
but very recently he's said things in particular about spiderman that in my opinion gives him less merit.@C.Lee I don't that is the case here. Sneider has had a pretty good track record in the past.
C. Lee said:Or perhaps.....some people who post on the internet for profit will say anything to get people to click on to their site.
Yeah, but that wasn't suppose to be taken as a scoop... he actually printed that article into The Wrap (which is a trade site just like Variety and Deadline) I don't think he would have printed the information if it was false.but very recently he's said things in particular about spiderman that in my opinion gives him less merit.
Exactly, right now pretty much any actor is likely to get the role, but the best for the role, the person who has the most popularity and will make the best PP or SM which will then make the most money/success for the franchise, is most likely.Lol ... It's your right to believe them Harryoscop. You can. They got things right too in the past. But remember they got many things wrong too.
But at this point it's funny. Like LR "Planet HUlk" scoop - Manganiello as Death Stroke ...
Kevin Feige said it himself, in their mind the new Peter Parker is 15 - 16 . But in term of CASTING ACTORS he doesn't know. Meaning he can be 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, ... 28 - I don't even know myself lol!
I was talking about him suggesting spiderman is black. in both cases, is objective was to mislead, and he did.Yeah, but that wasn't suppose to be taken as a scoop... he actually printed that article into The Wrap (which is a trade site just like Variety and Deadline) I don't think he would have printed the information if it was false.
RE: Liam James
![]()
Top row: 1, 2, 3
Bottom row: 4, 5, 6
If I am going to put them in order of who looks most like Spider-Man
5 -
6
1
2
3
These people you are on about work in the movie business in the very loosest sense though. They are scoopers and gossips and rely on people traffic on their sites to get them business.I've been in contact with some of these people that work in the movie business for some weeks, and I'd beg to differ, it's a lot more complex than that. Yes they work with this and want to make money out of this, but they do KNOW about stuff. If you see someone like redditleaker dude keeps saying that Dylan O'Brien will be Spider-Man, and he is doing on reddit. Eventually anyone will believe on him anymore, so why he did it, if not for the money? I'd say it's for the attention.
What I think it's more tacky and a serious case of poor management are actors with rabid fanbases not extinguishing the flames so people that aren't exactly fans of their work but could check out eventually about stuff they KNOW that aren't happening for them, or at least that they haven't heard it yet. That's also for the money and the attention, and I'd say it's a lot worse than the movie reporters.
I've been in contact with some of these people that work in the movie business for some weeks, and I'd beg to differ, it's a lot more complex than that. Yes they work with this and want to make money out of this, but they do KNOW about stuff. If you see someone like redditleaker dude keeps saying that Dylan O'Brien will be Spider-Man, and he is doing on reddit. Eventually anyone will believe on him anymore, so why he did it, if not for the money? I'd say it's for the attention.
What I think it's more tacky and a serious case of poor management are actors with rabid fanbases not extinguishing the flames so people that aren't exactly fans of their work but could check out eventually about stuff they KNOW that aren't happening for them, or at least that they haven't heard it yet. That's also for the money and the attention, and I'd say it's a lot worse than the movie reporters.
@C.Lee I don't that is the case here. Sneider has had a pretty good track record in the past.
I have no doubt they know about this stuff. But when it comes right down to it. It's all about the clicks. I took a Writing for the Web course and about 90% of it was how to get people to click on your stuff (via SEO, link placement, design features, attention grabbing headings, etc.). The remaining 10% was learning how to write in short paragraphs and coping with the fact that most of your audience isn't going to read what you write anyway.
The majority of all web writing (and pretty much any writing in a professional sense) is to sell you something first, whether be it an idea or a product, and anything else second.
Also, blaming actors is ridiculous. Are you suggesting that O'Brien needs to come out and say he doesn't have the part? Guess what. He's done that. Didn't work. Plus, as you said, it's getting him money and attention--it's just good business sense. As is Sneider's headline.
For me:
5 -
1
6
3
4
"I don't want Nat Wolff, Dylan O'Brien or anyone that can't look like a 15 years old kid" number![]()
Well, yeah. of course I know what it means. I don't believe EVERYTHING I hear.. but do think Sneider is right about them casting an 17-20 and think the five actors that he mentioned are very strong candidates.Have you ever looked up the word naïve?
Have you ever looked up the word naïve?
Bet there are some people who will say '5' doesn't look like Spider-Man.
If I only had a dollar for everytime I read that on the Hype in the last 13 years.I've been in contact with some of these people that work in the movie business
I don't think it pays off in the long run. Yes he's getting attention, but their fans are also annoying the hell out of lot of people - once again, not talking necessarily here, there are places it's a lot worse - and I just think that it would work wonders for his image if he endorsed literally ANYONE for the role so this non-sense would stop or at least calm down. Because seriously, I just can't see myself watching any films with this actor in it, and while I know that's not his fault, I just can't. It's pretty much the same with Robert Pattinson.
If I only had a dollar for everytime I read that on the Hype in the last 13 years.