Shanio1
Alright,alright,alright
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2014
- Messages
- 1,081
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
na..i think it's been out in several territories and he's not there.
I think he means in the extended edition which is rumoured to be in the Blu-ray of AoU
na..i think it's been out in several territories and he's not there.
so like a sneek peak of spiderman but not something to do with the film itself?I think he means in the extended edition which is rumoured to be in the Blu-ray of AoU
Exept that Feige has said spidreman is already spiderman in the world, before aou.Spider-Man couldn't have become Spider-Man in phase 1. There's just no way you can go through all of these films and Spider-Man isn't at least referenced. I think he becomes Spider-Man sometime after AoU.
Very sad. :/https://***********/DanielRPK/status/592150477929717760
LOL!
Sad but true. Poor Billy.
Still think it's a mistake to pass on the two best and most popular actors under 25 just to cater to some dumb High School theme and age restriction. O'Brien and Lerman are better actors than these kids they are looking at by a mile, already have built in fan bases and have pretty much proven they could carry a franchise. Forget that fact that I hate the idea of a bunch of High School Spider-Boy movies, it's just a smart business decision and both are very good actors that are capable of nailing the role.
 ).
).Still think it's a mistake to pass on the two best and most popular actors under 25 just to cater to some dumb High School theme and age restriction. O'Brien and Lerman are better actors than these kids they are looking at by a mile, already have built in fan bases and have pretty much proven they could carry a franchise. Forget that fact that I hate the idea of a bunch of High School Spider-Boy movies, it's just a smart business decision and both are very good actors that are capable of nailing the role.
Even though billy tweet isn't right way to go. But it worked for Vin getting a role. But that's the thing we don't know if billy was even a option ever did he test did he not. We know so little on the actual casting process. Or for that matter if casting is still on going.
so like a sneek peak of spiderman but not something to do with the film itself?
Are you betraying me now that you think there's something positive with 0'Brien playing the role?

https://***********/DanielRPK/status/592150477929717760
LOL!
Sad but true. Poor Billy.
word.
And perhaps even the o'brien haters would've accepted him if somy and Disney said from the get go that they're doing college Peter pArker (which they should, imo)
i don't believe Peter Parker is supposed to be 15 right now. That would mean, depending on how long he's been operating as a superhero, that he got bit when he was 13/14, which is ridiculous. That's just too young, and I don't want to see that juvenile of a Spider-Man, even though youth as a big thing of his character arc/mythos.
This may just be semantics, bur in the interview, it sounds like Feige wants Pete in high school to follow his stories from the high school era which weren't capitalized in previous films (according to him). It didn't sound like he was interested in a specific age. He's thinking high school, not a particular age. So when he answers, he was answering he would be in high school, so age 15/16 sounded about right. And again, he said he had no idea how old the actor would be (or if he was cast, he wasn't going to reveal it).
I honestly think Feige will pick whoever he feels best embodies how he envisions Peter, regardless of age.
I agree with this.
I'd just like an announcement so we don't need to bicker anymore, hate seeing the hypesters bicker...


hm, I don't see any indication there of spiderman though. seems like that is still speculation.
Wow...didn't see Billy's campaign the last so many hours...
there we go. you just proved my point.As consistent I am with my anti-O'Brien stuff, that'd make me back off immensely for two major reasons:
1. It'd be one of the better choices to make. That way, almost all parties would be satisfied.
2. O'Brien wouldn't just be a possibility, he'd probably already be in contention along with the likes of Lerman, Highmore, etc.
it'd help if we knew just when he was bit and how long he's been a superhero in the mcu. do we have an organized timeline of the mcu from phase 1 to phase 2?If they're going with a 15 year old Peter Parker, mark my words that he's going to still be very early in being Spider-Man (talking about a couple of months). If they go the 16 year old route, he could've been Spider-Man for 6 months or a year and was hidden on the under the radar.
there we go. you just proved my point

it'd help if we knew just when he was bit and how long he's been a superhero in the mcu. do we have an organized timeline of the mcu from phase 1 to phase 2?
 
	Huh?!
 
				