The Amazing Spider-Man The Official ASM THEATRICAL TRAILER Thread!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I disagree completely. The first person view in Raimi's film wasn't used anywhere near as extensively as it was in TASM. It was just a camera moving up and down for a few seconds... with TASM, it shook as he jumped, landed. You could make out glints of his shadow as he ran around and whatnot. I loved all of those little details.

I still think that people are saying "it looks too CGI" because they know that it is actually CGI.

What looks so fake about this?

TASM.png

I wasn't a fan of it and the effects while not terrible weren't great either but I'll give it a pass seeing as there is still a ton of time left to polish the effects.

There were no first person sequences is the Raimi films..


And Webb has already stated that it will be used very sparingly for very specific scenes.

It happened during some of the swing scenes albeit not a lot. The final swing in the last scene isn't quite first person as we still see Spider-Man but its damn close to it when he's going in between the taxi.
 
But what exactly didn't look great about it?

It looked pretty damn photorealistic to me. The only thing that looked a little shoddy to me was Spidey's reflection as he's jumping towards the window. That's it.
 
I don't think the objects themselves look CGI in the first person shot in the ASM teaser. However, I do think the whole thing looked a little video gamey the way he moved (like when he slided and landed)
 
I don't think the objects themselves look CGI in the first person shot in the ASM teaser. However, I do think the whole thing looked a little video gamey the way he moved (like when he slided and landed)

That bit actually did remind me of Mirror's Edge. lol
 
I'm with Troy, everyone just says, "It looked bad.", with nothing to back it up. It looks ****ing fantastic.


And calling that .00005 second sequence during the final swing a POV shot is a little generous.
 
lol Me too. In fact, everyone on this board was off the walls excited about it when it came out.
 
I'm with Troy, everyone just says, "It looked bad.", with nothing to back it up. It looks ****ing fantastic.


And calling that .00005 second sequence during the final swing a POV shot is a little generous.

For all your righteous defending of KAW on his rights to express his opinions you are sure quick to judge others opinions and immediately dismissing them.

Sounds real hypocritical if you ask me.
 
Ehh, I rewatched it recently
and found it to be....underwhelming, I guess. I hope the next trailer is good though.

But you've complained about people "jumping the bandwagon!" whenever people who, at least according to you, liked Raimi's movies back when they were new and then changed opinion about it. Even though it's been ages which actually let you have plenty of time to change opinion and "grow out" of it and see new flaws.

You don't realise that people may have rewatched Raimi's films as well?
 
For all your righteous defending of KAW on his rights to express his opinions you are sure quick to judge others opinions and immediately dismissing them.

Sounds real hypocritical if you ask me.

KAW backs his points up, which is why I'm criticizing you. You didn't. Nice try though.
 
@Pac-Master


^^ It's not just that though. The tone of the teaser is also a turn off as well, but as I said, if the new trailer is good, then great.
 
But you've complained about people "jumping the bandwagon!" whenever people who, at least according to you, liked Raimi's movies back when they were new and then changed opinion about it. Even though it's been ages which actually let you have plenty of time to change opinion and "grow out" of it and see new flaws.

You don't realise that people may have rewatched Raimi's films as well?
I'm sure some people's opininos have changed, but nto everybody's. My main problem with certain people is nto the fact that some disliek the films, but the fact that they claim Raimi was so unfaithufl to the comics which is absoloute complete bulls***.
 
^^ It's not just that though. The tone of the teaser is also a turn off as well, but as I said, if the new trailer is good, then great.

My point still stands. You liked it back then, you don't now. That's OK to you (and to me as well). But others who liked Raimi's films back then but don't now, are called "jumping the bandwagon" by you. Where's the difference?
 
My point still stands. You liked it back then, you don't now. That's OK to you (and to me as well). But others who liked Raimi's films back then but don't now, are called "jumping the bandwagon" by you. Where's the difference?
I didn't mean everybody has jumped the bandwagon when I said that, but there are obivously a few who have.

Why are you provoking me?
 
Because I think you're being a hypocrite.
and if I am, then I'm sorry. But, there are far too many people who have changed their opinions on the X-Men franchise as wlel and not just because of "time going by." I mena ,be hoenst, do youactually think everybody dislikes bryan Singer now because of his X-Men films? No. There are obviously bandwagon fans out there.

You've been purposely trying to provoke me for quite a few days now.
 
I'm critizising you for your hypocrisy, that's not provoking.
 
I'm critizising you for your hypocrisy, that's not provoking.
Then I have the right to do the same to you or KAW. If you haven't noticed, I haven't started any arguements in a LONG time, but you've been sneakily trying to get me to argue with you for quite a few days now. Please don't be stubborn about it.
 
Like I said, if I'm being a hypocrite, then I'm sorry. However, I find it EXTREMELY disrespecful that somebody, such as yourself, would deliberately try to startr an arguement with me and dereail a thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"