I agree with you overlord, five characters is a lot. It should be interesting to see what route they go with. If were talking a potential trilogy the only villain I can see having his own film is zoom, the question is, do you put him in an origin film or do you save him for a sequel.
Geoff Johns certainly has a tough task ahead of him, convincing the studio that captain cold isnt a mr. freeze rip off, explaining mirror masters gear and thats just the tip of the iceberg. Flash is going to be a unique one to crack.
Save Zoom for a sequel, he is far too big a threat for Flash to deal with right away.
Considering no really cares about Mr. freeze anymore, I don't think Cold will be a problem.
Big Bad = Last Rogue Standing.
And, I've laid out a number of reasons why I think Mirror Master is a natural for that.
The Big bad should be more then the last rogue standing it should be the villain who moves the plot forward.
If you are going to make MM the Big Bad, you shouldn't have the other villains make fun of his costume, unless he is going to punish them right away to maintain his menace.
And if you really think 5 supporting characters is a lot of develop in a 2 hour movie with action scenes, I think you need to watch a heck of a lot more movies. Any "men on a mission" movie, for instance. The Rogues are a group of "men on a mission". The mission: Take down the Flash. You must think The Dirty Dozen was some amazing feat of logistics. Or any heist caper. Or the majority of Quentin Tarantino movies which feature some scene of people talking around a table which develops the characters involved.
Those are heist movies though, those characters are the protongists, of course they are going get most of the sscreen time, that isn't the case with the Flash, it isn't a heist movie, Flash is going to get more screen then the Rogues, so they are not comparable to the guys in heist movies.
I think you have to throw numbers at the Flash in any scenario involving any of the Rogues since it's nearly impossible for there to be a believable fist fight with any of them. Or to avoid being repetitive. How do you separate 2nd act action from 3rd act action? Most movies tend to do that by throwing henchmen at the hero in Act 2, so he can beat them up and make progress, how do you do that with a single Rogue? Do you give them a lot of henchmen? Doesn't that go in a less interesting direction than multiple different villains?
The spider-Man movies didn't have henchmen and they did fine, building the action up for Act to act.
If you have an more manageable number of Rogues, like say 3.
Flash's origins, Flash fights some regular crime, Flash foils one of the rogues while committing a robbery and Mirror Master saves said Rogue, Captain Cold decides they have to eliminate the Flash, so they step up a trap that pulls all the stops and uses every advantage they to make the fight tough for Flash. Flash wins, end of movie.
Flash being less powerful then in the comics and being a rookie can explain why he is having so much trouble with them.
As I've said before, X-Men is a fine example of how to manage a bunch of villains. One or two of the villains get built up, in that case Magneto and Mystique, the rest are more glorified henchmen. Build up Cold and Mirror Master, use the other 2 or 3 Rogues as supporting henchmen, eliminate all the competing heroes as supporting characters, and there's plenty of time within that to flesh out Flash and Iris. Yeah, they covered the origin as "mutants" but they also had a discovering your powers scene, establishing the world, politics, tour of the mansion, look at those costumes, etc. If you can handle a dozen or so characters in an X-Men movie, you can handle a little over half of that in another superhero movie.
Magneto who was clearly the Big Bad, received any character focus in that movie, Mystique had one line, Toad had one line and Sabertooth had two lines.
So unless Cold and MM are only rogues who get more one line, that comparison doesn't work.
Especially when the motive for the villains is "Let's steal some loot."
Except their motive by the end of the film would be kill Flash, not just steal stuff.
Heck, I'll use Robocop as an example. Dick Jones and Clarence Boddicker were the main villains, but they made sure that Boddicker's crew was colorful and distinctive. There's zero reason that the last couple of Rogues need to be any more distinct than Boddicker's crew. And you don't even have to worry about the OCP corporate politics thing since these guys are already on the same page from the beginning.
But again there wasn't whole scenes where Boddicker and his gang just sat around a table and talked to each other. They had small little exchanges while doing something else, like showing off some weapons. Not mention common thugs are less expensive for a budget then super villains.
Or, for that matter, how many villains were there in Dick Tracy while the focus was still squarely on the hero? Sure, most were no more than cameos, but isn't that the point?
The same deal with X-Men, only Big boy had any real focus in that gang.