Transformers The Reviews Thread

can you Imagine Internet nit-pickyness with any of those 80's classics from our youth? Raiders of the Lost Ark, Back to the Future, Jedi? They would've gotten ripped up.

Jedi? yes

Raiders, Back to the Future? no



There are movies fanboys generally like: Batman Begins, Spiderman 2, X2, The Matrix

movies they have mixed feelings about: Hulk, Daredevil, SM3

and movies they hate: Elektra, CINO, Batman and Robin

It's called having standards. :o
 
i read a few reviews today in the local weekly entertainment papers etc and they all say the same thing pretty much...
to sum them up....
the special effects are the best commited to celluloid.. mindblowing action and effects that have truly raised the bar....very entertaining over the top testosterone fuelled movie.....a poor script [i agree having read it] poor and cheesey dialogue, shia lebouf is good but the overall human element is weak.....
basically the consensus is that its a typical michael bay film.....awesome visual spectacle, with little substance....but the spectacle is so spectacular and the robots action so awesome that the films clear weaknesses can be generally overlooked.
i will be seeing it tomorrow and will give my report.

hate to say it but the human element would be stronger if there were less transfromers stuff
(balance is hard, and instead of pleasing everyone, u'll tend to give everyone something to hate)

apart from that, it sounds like the usual 90 percent of the problems are scriptwise and thank god bay is onboard to make it enjoyable still!
(honestly someones gotta say it:whatever:....maybe len wiseman could have shot this (Spielberg approved) script better)
 
There are movies fanboys generally like: Batman Begins, Spiderman 2, X2, The Matrix

movies they have mixed feelings about: Hulk, Daredevil, SM3

and movies they hate: Elektra, CINO, Batman and Robin

It's called having standards. :o

I can agree on the first part about the general opinions of said movies, but as usual your talk about standards is way to generalizing. If I have valid reasons for liking a film that isnt everyone cup of tea. Does that mean I have lower standards than you BF? Not really. It's a matter of personal preferences and tastes.
 
can you Imagine Internet nit-pickyness with any of those 80's classics from our youth? Raiders of the Lost Ark, Back to the Future, Jedi? They would've gotten ripped up.

All these reviews should do is see someone elses opinion, and possibly warn you about dissapointment (X3, Ghost Rider, FF2, Snakes on a Plane). I knew not everyone would dig it, but regardless, I'm seeing it next Monday at 8pm.

I don't have to imagine it... I remember it.... BBS's, Compuserve, Quantum Link, fanzines, etc. Indiana Jones & Temple of Doom was nitpicked. Return of the Jedi was hated by everyone over 13, loved by kids under 5, and those of us in the middle kinda neutral.
 
i just watched the "at the movies". australias premier movie review show with esteemed movie critics margeret promeranz and david stratton and they both enjoyed the film....they both gave it 3.5 stars...
margeret said that the credit must go to michael bay for bringing real muscle and a big screen experience. they both said they are not fans of bay, but its best film....they also agreed that the "robots" are well fleshed out and have some real character that u care for.....
sounds good.....i tend to agree with these 2 for the most part....
man i cant wait for tomorrow....
 
^ I believe this!.... The film will NOT be a movie of thinking!!! But it'll be exstremely badass!!! and that's all I'm hoping for.
 
You're confusing the terms "Fantasy" with "Fiction." Transformers was not fantasy by virtue of being a kid's show and undeveloped. Transformers was as much "fantasy" as G.I. Joe was (meaning it's not).
Incorrect. I'm pretty sure you could easily come up with an explanation for why humans are running around with guns:wow:
Yes, it's not real... but that's called "fiction."
No fiction is just writing that is not non-fiction. Fantasy is a genre of fiction which Transformers was.
Transformers was as much "sci-fi" as a kid's afterschool cartoon could have been.
Sci-Fi goes out of it's way to make some pseudo-science explanation for things. Radioactive-spider-bit-leads to genetic recombowhatzit-and we get Spider-Man. Part of the reason storylines like "The Other" and "The Spider Totem" are so controversial in Spider-Man is because they took a Sci-Fi based character and moved him into the realm of fantasy and magic. Transformers never attempted to back the show or comic with Science, it always used magic heavily. While it could, as much as Star Wars, be considered Sci-Fi, Sci-Fi was only used at a surface level. When pressed for explanations of things it used magical beings and items like "The Matrix", "Vector Sigma", "Primus", and even characters capable of summoning magic.

Transformers far more resembles Star Wars, which essentially revolved around the very unscientific "the Force", and the Jedi. Yes their were lasers, aliens and star crusers....but you know as well as I that the mythology and storyline of Star Wars is that of a typical fantasy journey.
It's also funny that when Transformers was going the Legend of Zelda route (that you love), so was Hasbro's other property, G.I. Joe, with the ridiculous Cobra-La thing.
Yes, well it was the same company. But remember the comic, even though I cannot speak of Joe, introduced the concept of the Matrix much earlier (in an obviously different form) and had been doing these Legend of Zelda type quest stories for quiet some time in the UK.

Also G.I.Joe was written by the same people most of the time, and moreover exists in the same continuity as the Transformers.
 
I can agree on the first part about the general opinions of said movies, but as usual your talk about standards is way to generalizing. If I have valid reasons for liking a film that isnt everyone cup of tea. Does that mean I have lower standards than you BF? Not really. It's a matter of personal preferences and tastes.

There is such a thing as having standards.

Some people have higher standards than others.

This is a fact.
 
Transformers: 3.5/5

As the film rolled I quickly forgot about all of the differences with past versions of the Transformers and just soaked up the story. It does have one, but like with many other Michael Bay films it tends towards the light side in the substance department and smothered in flashy veneer.

There were a few things I could do without and other aspects of the movie that I really enjoyed, so overall I kinda liked it.
 
What a surprise. So basically it's a typical Michael bay flick. I wouldn't be surprised if it performed similarly at the box office as well. Yet there's a part of me that's curious to see it, but fearful of the dissappointment.

Looks like the latest Potter film and Pixar film are going to be the best films this summer (I really enjoyed Spidey 3, 3/4 of it anyway). Gotta admit, I'm starting to hear some good things about Diehard.
 
What a surprise. So basically it's a typical Michael bay flick. I wouldn't be surprised if it performed similarly at the box office as well. Yet there's a part of me that's curious to see it, but fearful of the dissappointment.

Looks like the latest Potter film and Pixar film are going to be the best films this summer (I really enjoyed Spidey 3, 3/4 of it anyway). Gotta admit, I'm starting to hear some good things about Diehard.

It's out today...and at 86% on RT. I wouldn't say that's too shabby.
 
It's out today...and at 86% on RT. I wouldn't say that's too shabby.

So I've heard...I think some may have underestimated the simplistic appeal of the Diehard franchise (one against many, the underdog against unbelievable odds) and of course Bruce. Diehard could be a major surprise. On the flipside, many have overestimated the talent of Michael Bay, why I don't know. I wouldn't put him in the upper echelon of directors. I haven't seen a single film from him that would make me say he's an artist.

I find it interesting that he's (supposedly) such a huge anime fan. Yet even anime, kinetic as it is, the action has a flow, style, artistry to it. I don't see any of that in his work.
 
Some more midnight reviews -

This one from an anti-bay fan..

MAJOR SPOILERS
http://seibertron.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=8803&sid=

I saw the pre screening tonight.

Now. I just want to say, I really dislike Bay's work. I was extremely disappointed when I first heard he was doing this movie, fully expecting it to be a complete load of pants.

I'll happily admit I was wrong. I will happily admit that I had many many joygasms watching this movie, and will also happily admit I almost cried at various scenes out of pure happiness.

A quick lowdown of my opinions.

Megatron: Voice was perfect. I was disappointed when Welker didn't get the part, but Agent Smith did an excellent job, his voice suited Megs perfectly.

Frenzy: Could have done without him. Sounded too much like an ewok crossed with Johnny 5.

Jazz: Kinda glad he died. He was just plain irritating, really. No real character development, although he died well.

Prime: Lips were disturbing for a little while, but you get used to him. Cullen did an excellent job.

Ironhide: Wow. That is all. All I'll say is: Bazooka jump from Doom.

Starscream: Didn't really get alot of screen time, his voice was good though, just whiny enough to be him, yet stronger. Hopefully will see more of him in the next one.

Plot: Thin. And yet, if they'd made it too complicated, it would have been a distraction. It was simple enough for the movie to work.

Oh, and for a director who doesn't like mass shifting, what the HELL was that with the All Spark? I mean, seriously, you wont make an 80ft robot into a tape deck, but you'll happily make a 3,000 tonne rock cube into a handy bite sized chunk of Styrofoam? Meh.

All in all, I loved it. It had a few little tiny problems, but overall, it was the best movie I have seen in a long, long, long time. The action sequences were brilliant, Megatron was -way- more of an utter bastard than he was in G1, which he needed. It had a little more comedy than I thought was necessary, but it seemed to work pretty well, all things considered.

My one HUGE problem with the movie, was this. The 'Prime Speaks' competition. The lines in the movie were SO forced, they just sounded unnatural. They just didn't fit. I mean, Kudos to Bay for trying to keep us fan boys happy, but guys? Let's just stay out of it for the next one. Even people who didn't know about the competition were complaining that the lines sounded way too cheesy and forced.

So yeah. That's my opinion. I'll be seeing it again when it opens here.

This one from a G1 fan:

http://seibertron.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=8803&sid=

Woohoo, *just* got back from seeing it too (Midnight screening, New Zealand time Grin ). The first post was pretty much spot on, but I just wanted to add a few things.

So I'm well and truly a Gee-Wunner, and at first I was quite dissapointed that the movie, although touted as a G1 movie, was going to be nothing like it. I couldn't care less about Michael Bay, I liked The Rock and Armageddon, so I knew he could make entertaining movie. But my main gripe was that it still wasn't 'true' G1.

Not that it mattered. This movie was wicked! And Peter Cullen made the movie, for me. Hearing him was all that I needed to make me happy, which just so happened to be the opening lines. Hearing the original transformation sound at the start with Blackout's transformation was icing on the cake, but I disappointed that it didn't turn up at all after that Sad

The action was good, the CGI was believable, and suprisingly I didn't really mind the character designs. It was still Transformers to me. Yeah, the plot was thin and the way it ended was a bit anti-climatic. But at least I know there's going to be more to come. So for me, I can break it down like this...

It's definitely 'Transformers' (ie it has the spirit of TFs)
Bay did the fight scenes well, awesome set pieces
The human characters weren't annoying, but I felt they had a tad too much screen time
For me, Peter Cullen was the smartest move Bay made, not that he made too many stupid ones
Welker would have made an AWESOME Megs. Weaving was OK though
I'd see it again, in the theatres. And buy the DVD.
 
A positive review from Jolopnik (a car blog site, G1 fans) full review coming tonight.
Jalopnik Had A Transformers-Induced Robogasm

There's very little we can say at the moment about the Transformers movie as we're bound to an embargo date on our movie review / plot details of 12:01 AM tomorrow morning. But here's what I can tell you:

-As you can see by the above shot, last night we ended up as a Decepticon.

-We walked out of the theater last night with one of the biggest grins on our face we've had in a long time.

-Michael Bay did not ruin our childhood.

-This movie will make A TON of money.

-GM Exec VP of Design Ed Welburn drives an amazing yellow '69 Camaro -- but he wouldn't wear the blinking Autobot t-shirt.

-We don't think Camaro designer Brian Smith drives an amazing yellow '69 Camaro -- but he did wear the blinking Autobot t-shirt.

-For the next few weeks General Motors is the luckiest automaker on earth.
 
http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/showthread.php?t=139686

An Australian movie review show gave Transformers a pretty good review, three and a half stars each.

Link to review and video. (a very very minor spoiler if you've hid under a rock for the past few months )
http://www.abc.net.au/atthemovies/txt/s1950144.htm

I should note that the reviewers, Margaret and David, are probably the most well-known critics in Australia and are usually quite the lefty arty types, so I was surprised that they praised Bay.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Margaret
But the real credit must go to director Michael Bay. He brings a muscular, visceral energy to the film that makes you very aware of enjoying a big screen experience.

Later comments:

Anyway, (assuming the ABC haven't uploaded the review video yet), IIRC, David went on to say he agreed that Transformers, like many modern action films, cuts too quickly and didn't stay focused on particular shots, possibly because of the younger generation's being used to things moving very, very quickly, perhaps due to being brought up on computer games (joking that maybe they should train the younger generation should slow down abit, or alternatively train the older generation to speed up).

He then asked Margaret if this was her first good Bay review, and she disagreed (They gave The Island 4 and 3 stars respectively), and he replied Bay hasn't had a very good track record, to which she agreed, but said Bay did bring that sort of muscularity to films to which he agreed.

David said what sets this film somewhat apart (though he is not a huge fan) are the human characters, who are pretty well defined, well acted and an interesting cast, there's alot of humour in it and the special effects, as always in these films, are wonderful.

Margaret then said what surprised her was that the TFs had real personalities, which he agreed. She said they seem to have more personality than some real characters they've seen in films lately, which he said was true.
 
A few fan reviews:

MAJOR SPOILERS
http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/showthread.php?t=139714

Wasn't feeling too well during the day so I was a little out of it in the cinema hall. Slight nausea and lots of excitement dont exactly mix well.

Crowd was the blandest, dullest I've ever watched with. There were very few fans in the audience I think. There were no reactions to anything, in fact it was only our group that reacted to anything. Sheesh...

Non-spoiler version: 4 out of 5 stars for me. Aside from my feeling like crap, I really enjoyed it. Autobot fans will adore this, Decepticon fans... maybe not so much.

Peter Cullen deserves an award for his work as Prime. Much respect to the man, his Optimus still has what it takes to inspire people to action.

Hugo Weaving's Megatron, despite the controversy, was really well done. If you didnt know he was doing the voice, you wouldn't know it was him. Hella scary man.

Spoiler version starts here...








Yes, Jazz dies. Yes, Megatron rips him in half. Yes, he dies trying to defend the others - distracting Megatron to buy the others time to get the Allspark out of the immediate vicinity. Yes, they mourn him at the end. That is all I will say on the matter.

Frenzy... I LOVE FRENZY!!! He is the sneakiest, most vicious, most annoying, most adorable little bastard I have ever laid eyes on and GIVE ME A FRAGGING FRENZY TOY LIKE NOW, DAMMIT! Little fragger gets in just about everywhere to cause mayhem, speaks a garbled mix of English and Cybertronian, flipped someone off, and I just want to hug him... even if it means he'll slice my head off with those killer CDs of his.

The Autobots are love.

Prime was awesome. Gentle at just the right moments, firm when he needed to be, downright vicious when he was forced to be (his "Get out of the car" to the Sector 7 guys would probably make a grown man wet himself), has a sense of humor. I'll be the first one to admit I REALLY like Movie Prime, ALOT. Peter Cullen, you the man! You rock!

Why do the Autobots use so much slang? Easy. Prime explains that they picked up English from the Internet. 'Nuff said.

Ironhide... Ahh good ol' Ironhide. Such a teddy bear. Kinda trigger-happy (he wanted to waste the Sector 7 guys) Good fighter. Voice was great! He had that slightly older, slightly more mature voice. You really get the Old Veteran feel from him, very much in character. I really wanted to hug him.

Ratchet. D'aww... I got the friendly neighborhood doctor from him. Also cuddle-worthy. Could have used a few more lines, but considering the amount of content in the Movie, he did get quite a bit of screentime. That cutting-blade on his arm was wicked.

Bumblebee... Again, this Movie made me LIKE Bee. Bee was adorable, just the cutest little thing ever. He's the audience's link to the Autobots and despite not being able to speak, emotes VERY WELL. Yes, he moved me to tears when Sector 7 started harpooning him and Sam was screaming and trying to stop them, and again when they were 'experimenting' on him. I'm sure Spielberg had influenced that. He gets his voice back at the end when he comes into contact with the Allspark.

Jazz... this was an edgier Jazz than we're used to in G1. Not as gentle-sounding. He was what I would call a mix of Blaster and Jazz, which fit his alt mode. Voice was spot on. He almost looks like he's break-dancing when he transforms and is quite the loyal bot. He was the only one to try and persuade Prime into going after Bee after Bee was captured by Sector 7. I wish we could have seen more of him, but well... he still went out a hero.

The Cons, well apart from Frenzy and Megatron, the only other two who get speaking lines are Starscream (again, another good voice) and Barricade. Not much character development for them, which was expected since the Autobots were the main stars of this. Starscream has some slick moves. Blackout shone at the start. Bonecrusher and Brawl (Called Devastator) blew alot of stuff up.

The story was simple enough to follow. Three main threads joining together at the end for the final showdown. Thread 1 - the Army guys; 2 - Sam, Mikaela and the Autobots; 3 - The Secretary of Defense and the govt. No Shakespearean plot twists or deep storytelling, and thank Primus for that. Lots of eye-candy.

DEWBOT!!! Yes! The Mountain Dew vending machine TF makes an appearance.

I need to watch this again with a better crowd. Far too much to take in just one time. I also need to be less "out of it".

MAJOR SPOILER
http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/showthread.php?t=139691

I just got back from the premiere of the movie, and the first screenings to the public are now underway. Here's a few of my thoughts: *SPOILERS*

I too loved it. My mouth was ajar when Blackout landed, as it was my most anticipated scene, and it didn't dissapoint. Nothing beats a Decepticon blowing up the US military.


I was a weeee bit put off at the almost complete lack of characterization of the Decepticons. But I had somewhat expected this. However, I think the voice acting of Starscream, Megatron, Barricade and Ratchet were great, and of Cullen really stood out as Prime, there was just NO denying that was Prime. Weavings Megatron was tops too, really enjoyed it.


I also didn't overly appreciate the whole 'humans can kill transformers better than other tranformers' angle, but that was expected. Was sad to see Blackout fall, but figured it was coming. Loved that Prime decapitated Bonecrusher, that was definately not expected, and rendered Bonecrusher a completely useless character. Jazz's death was a bit rushed I thought, but good on them for showing how vicious Megatron could be.


The lack of characterisation of the Decepticons disappointed me, sure they didn't all have to have perfect ones, but we only saw 3 of them talk, Bonecrusher was gone within 5 minutes and Brawl and Blackout didn't speak a word, taken down by humans. That leaves 4 Decepticons remaining:

Starscream
Megatron (come on, you KNOW he'll be back)
Barricade
Scorponok


Overall, I was really impressed with the movie, and will definately go see it again. Loved hearing Doomsday Clock playing during the battle scene, and as credits rolled - didn't expect to hear the Smashing Pumpkins on the actual movie.



Final confirmation for people:
Brawl, Scorponok, Bonecrusher and Blackout do NOT speak. Frenzy speaks Cybertronian and swears in english at the end of the movie.
Jazz DOES die, and is beyond repair (Ratchet states he can't save him).
Barricade - status is unknown, is DEFINATELY in the freeway-chase, but last we see of him, so we can expect he is still alive, we didn't see otherwise.
Megatron - reportedly dead, dumped into the ocean. If one recalls, Megs and the Decepticons happened to have a underwater base in G1.
Bumblebee - cannot speak during movie, yet can at the end, my theory on this is that his vocal processors were healed when he came in contact with the allspark, he does not say 'Go, Sam' - he can speak properly.






Sequel:
Nice ending that makes it feel as if it could be the end of the series, but there were two distinct scenes that basically confirm the sequel.

1. Prime's speech - at the end of the movie, Prime gives off a speech about the fights and the allspark, states that with it's destruction Cybertron could not be saved, and he was sending this message out to any autobot survivors, and that they should come join them on earth.

2. Starscream ditches the fight in LA after getting rid of a bunch of human F22 raptors - in a final scene we see him flying through the atmosphere - we can presume that he's off to Cybertron or wherever else other Decepticons are.
 
Empire Online Australia's review:

http://www.empireonline.com.au/reviews/reviewcomplete.asp?FID=11052

Transformers

Plot
Two tribes of robots, disguised as everyday vehicles and objects, live on Earth. The Autobots, led by Optimus Prime, are decent blokes who respect human life. The Decepticons, led by Megatron, believe in the survival of the fittest and despise organic life. Things get hairy.

Empire Review
When it comes to blowing up **** real good, the final 30 minutes of Transformers may well be Michael Bay’s Sistine Chapel. If it can burst into flame, be riddled with bullets, pulverised, smashed, flipped, battered through a skyrise or slammed into a road, it is, with the resulting debris gleefully hurled into our faces as the Dolby thunder threatens eardrums and sanity. The camera swoops, pans, ducks and dives to keep pace with the flailing robots, crusading tanks, streaking missiles, jets and choppers. No scene is stretched beyond three seconds in case the audience – presumed to be addled with ADD – should find its collective mind wandering. In between the carnage – relocated to the centre of Los Angeles for no good reason other than to fuel Bay’s appetite for destruction – dialogue is reduced to military macho shorthand (“Bring the rain”, “Bring it!”, “I’ll drive, you shoot”) while emotions – love, fear – are best expressed in golden lit, slow-motion close ups of eyes widening, lips glistening, fingertips touching just so. This has always been the way of the Bay, but in Transformers the master of disaster has finally matched form with function. Love him or hate him, there’s no denying he’s the perfect director to make a movie based on toys.

These action figures in question were the 1984 Hasbro line of little robots who, with a twist, became cars, trucks, planes, etc. As a marketing push, a cartoon series was built up around Transformers. It subsequently became a 1986 animated movie. A cult was born and its membership remains strong enough that there has been a heated debate about this adaptation and Bay’s designs on their beloved Autobots and Decepticons.

Transformers acolytes have little to complain about in terms of design because, for what it is, Bay’s boffins deliver an updated, relatively believable realisation of the shape-shifting abilities of this metallic-organic, alien-robot thingamajig-species-product line. No fear on that score: the special effects set a new benchmark.

Pity, then, that to adhere to the original “vision” these creatures have to talk. Bumblebee, the hero’s masculine version of Herbie, is the strongest, most interesting of the robots because he’s unable to speak, except via snippets of conversation he samples from his car radio. When his good-guy comrades – Optimus Prime, Jazz, et al – start with the wisecracks and movie quotes, anyone other than a 10-year-old boy or an ardent fan of the original series will want to hide under their seat from embarrassment. (Just as awkward are the movie’s “hip” moments: Wince as Bay almost mocks Armageddon! Blush as Kill Bill: Vol. 1 is pointlessly referenced!) Thankfully the Decepticons – Megatron, Starscream, Blackout, et al – are less verbose, limiting themselves to evil Mogwai-style cackles and roared threats of extermination.
Lining up for humanity, Shia LaBeouf is winning as Transformers hero kid Sam Witwicky. Like he was in Disturbia, he’s a nervy, funny and smart-mouthed geek; an Everykid firmly in the Spielbergian mould. He scores laughs when the script’s up to scratch, and his realisation that there’s “more than meets the eye” to his beat-up Camaro is fun.

But the movie sags whenever it moves away from LaBeouf and we’re forced to spend time with dull stereotypes. There’s Megan Fox’s model-looking school hottie *****… who just happens to be a sensitive girl and a whiz with engines. There’s similarly babelicious Aussie Rachael Taylor who’s possibly the only – snicker – rad computer hacker in the world to get around in high heels. Tyrese Gibson and Josh Duhamel lead a gang of indestructible G.I. Joes, er, US Special Ops hardnuts who pour hot lead in the Decepticons’ direction. Jon Voight is the pasty-faced politician who, like Dick Cheney, wields a mean shotgun when need be. As the boss of the secretive Sector 7, John Turturro at least gets some weirdly funny moments (“Criminals are… hot!”) even if it feels like he wandered in from another, edgier movie.

In its first and mostly human hour Transformers does shape up well. The teen comedy tropes engage thanks to LaBeouf, there’s a sense of discovery and wonder, and Bay’s three action set pieces are intense and exciting. But then the film bogs down in exposition. Computer hacker makework takes an eternity to tell us what we already know. And the less said about the Transformer backstory the better; put it this way, we can suspend disbelief more easily when encoded spectacles and a magic Rubik’s Cube aren’t explained.

In its final third, as the film focuses on duelling robots and greater and greater havoc, we care less and less, particularly because most of the people, an afterthought to begin with, dwindle to almost nothingness. The special effects are undoubtedly amazing but they’re so frenzied it’s tough to keep track of who’s doing what to whom. The ultimate effect is anaesthetising when it should be exhilarating.

Verdict
At its most inspired, Transformers calls to mind Terminator 2 or Starship Troopers. What we end up with is more like a gazillion-dollar version of Godzilla Vs Mechagodzilla. This is precisely middle-tier Bay: below The Rock, Bad Boys and Armageddon, above Pearl Harbor, The Island or Bad Boys II.

Reviewer: Michael Adams
 
http://www.atomicmpc.com.au/article.asp?CIID=84174

Transformers
By Craig Simms | June 23, 2007 Email | Print | Discuss this Article (35 posts)


Snapshot
Specs: Directed by Michael Bay.

Starring Shia Labeouf, Megan Fox, Josh Duhamel, Rachael Taylor, Jon Voight, Peter Cullen
Verdict: Michael Bay shows the doubters that Optimus and friends were in safe hands all along.
Score: 8.5 out of 10



Apologies must be given to Michael Bay. We entered this film thinking it would be an unmitigated disaster – but not so.

Sure, the ramblings of the information siphoning robot named Frenzy were ‘comical’ in the way Lucas believes Jar-Jar Binks is ‘comical’, and the film was nearly unseated by the over the top shtick of the head of Section Seven – but somehow everything else remained on track.

The story covers the arrival of the Autobots and Decepticons on Earth, in search of the ‘All Spark’ – a cube that brings life to all machines. Slightly different from the original animated series, but it still works.

Megatron, tyrant of the Decepticons plans to use it to create himself an army out of Earth’s machines. Optimus Prime, leader of the Autobots decides destroying it is the only option, despite being the life giver of his race. The race is on to see who can find it first, the only link being Sam Witwicky – a descendant of the man who discovered the cube on Earth decades ago.

There’s a ridiculous amount of fan service here – a huge number of tie-ins, references and lines from the cartoon and original movie, and a few ironies to boot, making sure even the most ardent Transformers fan is satisfied, while never alienating the rest of the audience. They’re simply elements of the story designed to give those in the know a little kick. For example, sitting next to Bumblebee in a car lot is a yellow Volkswagen Beetle. Subtle, but non invasive for those who don’t know the history.

The controversy surrounding the different look of the robots falls by the wayside very quickly – yes they’re different, yet somehow the characters still shine through, especially Prime, given life by the original voice actor, the majestic Peter Cullen. The Decepticons are a little different – more used as a permanent threat until the end – only Megatron really has the opportunity to express character. This actually works in favour of the movie, with no time for posing Starscream, who embodies the term ‘menacing threat’, while the rest serve purely as agents of destruction.

While this is very much an action movie, there are still the strong sentiments of a moral tale present – summed up by Prime through the mantra ‘freedom is the right of all sentient beings’ and his willingness for self sacrifice to save others if necessary.

Rather than the special effects feeling like they’ve taken over the film like the Star Wars prequels, they simply are a part of the film – nothing in this regard is used in excess. Humour is well paced, action is frantic (sometimes too frantic, making it exceptionally hard to see what’s going on, especially in robot-on-robot battles), and at the end of the film you can’t help but feel Bay has done justice to a film that could have easily been massacred.

The human characters are, thankfully, utterly bearable. The young boy-to-man hero is played with likeable conviction by Shia LaBeouf. His love interest, rising vixen Megan Fox, looks sensational and sexy, but is an independent lass not afraid to get into the fight when the world needs another hero.

Jon Voight does a sterling job as Secretary of Defense. He’s the ‘Harrison Ford in Airforce One’ style of U.S. politician. He’s got guts, integrity and knows how to pack a gun.

Amusingly, the U.S. President is only momentarily shown, we don’t see his face or hear his name, but do hear a familiar Texan drawl, while, as the world erupts around him, he’s only interested in watching the big game on TV and ordering his staff to bring him more chocolate Ding Dongs. Nice one, Mr Bay.

There’s enough leads in the ending to insinuate sequels – but even with the promises of a James Earl Jones voiced Unicron and the appearance of Soundwave, we’d prefer the movie to stay at just one rather than become a Pirates of the Caribbean disaster.

Those who remember heroes that used to stand for integrity, selflessness and virtue and not the tired old ‘anti-heroes’ of today will love it, as will nostalgiacs and big kids alike.

If you don’t, you don’t have a heart.
 
These reviews are making me dizzy. But, I'm fairly pumped up again.
 
A quick fan review:

http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/showthread.php?t=139680

Well all I have go to say is frickin awesome. I have just got home from a special pre release screening of TRANSFORMERS at SkyCity Cinemas St Lukes which was put on by The EDGE radio station here in Auckland, New Zealand, (true home of the Americas Cup btw). Anybody not convinced yet by this movie is off their head. It has humor, a little bit cheesy at times, sad bits, and a whole lot of action. Those people who earlier on said that the movie would be more about people than the transformers will be as surprised as I was at how much Transformer action we actually get!! The G1 fans, like myself, will be happy too. Yes, the film strays somewhat from the G1 story, but it is essentially the same, and there are so many references and easter eggs of G1 goodness that make you smile and feel kinda excited about. In particular during the Megatron/Optimus show down there is a particular line that is straight G1. But hey, I don't wanna give too much away because I know how much that sucks when you already know whats gonna happen when you go to see a movie, so get out there and see it, more than once like I will be. Thats it. Roll Out.

oops I forgot to mention the biggest thing that I thought was an awesome nod to G1 was that Optimus Primes gives us a glimpse of the Matrix!!!
 
Sadly (but expectedly)...

With the latest batch of mixed reviews to hit the 'net, I've come to a few (new) conclusions.

1) There will be many cliche and WTF moments in Transformers.
2) From how it sounds, it could've been a much better film.
3) It'll still be fun.

Even though my expectations have lowered, I'm still looking forward to this film and I still think my jaw will drop, I'll get goosebumps from seeing Optimus Prime on a big screen, and I'll enjoy it despite it's apparent faults.
 
These reviews have some huge spoilers. Especially regarding the ending and other surprises.

Why can't they just tell us how they felt about the movie without crucial plot secrets and details?
 
I think the most brilliant thing Michael Bay has done was put Peter Cullen in it. Had this been the SAME exact movie sans Peter Cullen, I have a feeling all these reviews would be dismal.
 
These reviews have some huge spoilers. Especially regarding the ending and other surprises.

Why can't they just tell us how they felt about the movie without crucial plot secrets and details?


I hate to be one of those SHH posters, but you ARE in a spoiler forum reading reviews, man. You dont have to read the spoilers, it's not like heroin (just one fix).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,482
Messages
22,117,289
Members
45,907
Latest member
zorKiraa
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"