The Technology Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hidden LEDs Give This Wood-Faced Watch a Digital Display

dbetbhbzbtztarhrksb5.jpg


Watch faces have been made from some strange and wonderful materials, but can anything beat the natural beauty of wood? The folks at Tokyo Flash don't think so—they've figured out how make a digital watch display disappear under a wood veneer.

The Tokyo Flash Night Vision Wood features a sneaky LED display that shines through the watch's wooden face when activated, but disappears completely when turned off. It's got all the features you'd expect in a chintzy digital watch (time, date, alarm) and a USB-rechargeable battery. It's also got a pretty novel way of displaying the time, first seen on the original Night Vision: the missing block in the illuminated outer ring functions as the "little hand," while the minutes past the hour are displayed in the center. In the photo up top, the watch reads 2:05.

[YT]ddI3fio8fi0[/YT]

Yes, wearing a watch that looks like a non-functional wooden mock-up of a drugstore timepiece is a bit of a party trick, the kind of sight gag that would appeal to people who've only slightly outgrown the old joy buzzer. That said, the sight of plain ol' wood emitting an LED glow is kind of intriguing in a parallel-future way. If that's worth $150 to you, I don't think this watch has any competition.

http://www.redferret.net/?p=44015

I think it looks dope and I want one. I'm actually allergic to metal so I can't wear an all metal band and I hate the look of plastic or rubber so this would be just what I need
 
Last edited:
That's awesome. Retro and at the same time ultra modern.
 
Experimental Color-Changing Fabric Could Turn You Into a Chameleon

exewos78bihsqvyhc5iy.gif


Animals do it, so why shouldn't we? This experimental textile project by Judit Eszter Karpati allows a fabric to change its color in a snap, based on its surroundings, thanks to some Arduino brains.

Her Chromosonic research project is a programmable, electronic, colour-changing textile interface, that could have all kinds of applications. She explains the technicalities:

The installation consists of an arduino with 12V power supply and 20 custom PCBs driving and controlling 4 industrial 24V DC power supplies, that heat two handmade textile woven with nichrome wires and screenprinted with thermochromatic dying, revealing the preprogrammed patterns.
And she also explains how it works:

I intended to to find out how I could incorporate the world of digital media into textile art. The two slow moving textile displays present ambient content. They react to environmental impulses responding with an animated change in pattern.The virtual world alters genres, steps out to reality.The flatness of the screen, the glitch patterns appear on woven, flexible textile, integrated electronic devices. The patterns are generated from sound files. The heat sensitive static patterns create dynamically changing patterns. The spectators also can leave traces on the surface through the sense of touch.
It's pretty neat how the fabrics respond to their environment: a kind of all-permeating sensory camouflage. Imagine if the clothes we wore somehow responded to all our the sensory stimuli around us; we could become truly stealth-like, not just visually, but audibly, and perhaps even aromatically, too. This project feels like an amazing step in that direction.

http://chromosonic.tumblr.com/

Not too long in the future we will be able to go full Predator
 
There are a lot of camouflage technologies going on and if someone could combine them then a real functioning suit could be created.
 
GOP robocall firm slapped with $3 million fine

The Federal Communications Commission announced a $2.9 million fine Thursday against Dialing Services LLC, a New Mexico-based firm that the FCC says continued to place robocalls over the past year despite having been warned against doing so in March of 2013.

Dialing Services runs the website gopcalls.com, which says it's worked with Republican candidates and conservative causes "for over two decades." The site claims to have provided "calling solutions" for political candidates including Mitt Romney, Tom Tancredo and George W. Bush.

The company received its warning from the FCC last year after allegedly placing more than 4.7 million robocalls to mobile phones during the 2012 election cycle. It's illegal to place robocalls to cell phones except in limited circumstances: when the calls are made for emergency purposes, or when they're made with the prior consent of the recipient.

FCC enforcement chief Travis LeBlanc said the commission is "committed to protecting consumers from harassing, intrusive, and unwanted robocalls to cell phones, smart phones, and other mobile devices."

Reached by phone Thursday, Dialing Services owner Chris Kolker said he hadn't heard about the fine and needed to consult with his attorney.
CNN
 
$35 Billion Merger Fails Because Everyone in Charge Is a Baby

Last summer, two enormous advertising companies, Omnicom and Publicis, announced that they'd be merging to form the world's most enormous advertising company. Yesterday, they announced the deal is off. Why? Because these companies are essentially kindergarteners.

You can read all the stories today listing all of the obligatory reasons about why the huge merger failed, according to those involved— difficulty in merging corporate cultures, vague complications with tax issues and management clashes. But all it really comes down to, everyone seems to agree, is the fact that these two multibillion dollar global corporations could not agree who would win this thing. You see, "technically one company has to acquire the other, for accounting reasons." And they could not agree on who would be on which side, because, of course, who wants to be the acquired? Only losers! Our guys must be the top guys! Dealbook sums it up:

One significant unresolved issue was which company would be acquiring the other one. After much persuasion, Publicis was prepared to allow Omnicom to be the acquirer, according to people briefed on the matter. But Publicis then balked at the notion that Omnicom's management would retain control of both the chief executive and chief financial officer roles. Omnicom was pressing to have its finance chief, Randall J. Weisenburger, keep his role.
We have to be the #1 acquirer! If we are #2 then our guy must be #1! I want to be the first name on the door! No, I do! If my guy can't win then I don't care, I'm going home!

A thirty five billion dollar global corporation in action, ladies and gentlemen.

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/05...d-to-call-off-35-billion-merger/?ref=business

Man that's hilarious
 
Burgers For Breakfast, Because Nothing Really Matters

Burger King today announced that it will serve its burgers for breakfast now, as part of their new corporate philosophy, "Why try harder than absolutely necessary when the American people want nothing more than to eat themselves into oblivion to erase the pain of being locked into this zombie-like existence?"

BurgerBusiness.com, quietly the single most influential website in the United States if you really think about it, reports today that dingy grill joint Burger King has decided to forget its own path in the fast food breakfast wars by just... **** it, man, just serve people the same ****, do you think these people even care?

Burger King is rolling out a new "Burgers at Breakfast" menu that makes selected lunch and dinner favorites available in the morning alongside the chain's regular breakfast items. Previously, the rule was that burgers weren't available until 10:00 or 10:30 a.m. Some franchisees already had been circumventing that timetable and were selling breakfast burgers. Now corporate has given a formal green light to the practice, within boundaries.
Throughout America, people are giving up. The franchises are giving up on trying to follow the burger-timing rules. Burger King corporate is giving up on trying to enforce the burger-timing rules. And it's all being driven by the American public, which long ago gave up on trying to adhere to even the minimal sort of social standards of conduct that would prohibit a self-respecting human from ordering a Burger King Whopper at eight o'clock in the morning. It is not unfair to conclude that the Burger King Whopper itself is an appropriate symbol of America's slow and soothing descent into a second-tier nation marked by stifling inequality of both wealth and breakfast options.

Is it really worse than eating a "Croissanwich" and a side of "French Toast Sticks" for breakfast? We shall see.

http://www.burgerbusiness.com/?p=17652

Well on the bright side, sometimes when I get done spinning and partying in the wee morn I can grab a burger instead of the BK breakfast which is just horrid IMO
 
If you really think about it, what constitutes a breakfast food and why? What makes sausage one way a breakfast food but made another, a dinner? I'm still not eating there though.
 
The past few times I have been to BK I have walked away in utter disappointment. I mean it was really bad. Honestly it has to have been at least 6 months since I have been there
 
You Can Drive Over This Parking Lot Paved With Solar Panels

h9owxgh91kw2k7ecs6np.jpg


If you've scampered barefoot across asphalt on a sunny day, then you know driveways are already absorbing plenty of solar energy. What if we could actually harness it? Solar Roadways has created solar panels so strong you could drive a tractor right over them—plus they light up at night and heat to melt snow.

In 2009, Solar Roadways was just a nifty concept. Five years and two Department of Transportation research grants later, husband-and-wife team Scott and Julie Brusaw have created a working prototype in the driveway of their electronics lab.

As you would expect, the prototype looks different from their original concept. For one, the tiles are now hexagon shaped, which makes for better coverage over curves and hills. Super-strong textured glass protects the solar panel, LED lights, and heating elements underneath. It can withstand a 250,000-pound load—check out this tractor driving over the panels:

[YT]iKO-sDdJzTw[/YT]

Now the Brusaw's have launched a $1 million indiegogo campaign to continue developing Solar Roadways. The top reward for $10,000 is a miniature version of the road panel, which suggests your fully outfitted solar driveway is still far off in the future.

But it's certainly an intriguing idea—albeit with many challenges—to twin our road and electric infrastructures, both aging and in need of updates. A parking lot paved with solar panels could perhaps power its own lights, traffic signals, and electric car charging stations. A series of roads could be part of a town's electric grid—and just imagine the powerhouse that the interstate highway system could become.

http://www.wired.com/2014/05/solar-road/

Lots of cool possibilities here
 
China's Maglev Train Prototype Could Reach Speeds of 1,800 MPH

rditm8gdg3tau39smuvk.jpg


A research team in China just successfully tested a blisteringly fast transportation concept: super-maglev, a high speed train that could theoretically hit speeds of up to 1,800 miles per hour. That's three times the speed of a passenger jet.

BnNIeQAIEAEfzsN.jpg


The concept, put forth by the Applied Superconductivity Laboratory of Southwest Jiaotong University, uses the same technique proposed for Elon Musk's Hyperloop: run the train inside a vacuum tube, removing air resistance and enabling super high speeds uninhibited by wind resistance. Research shows that, for vehicles traveling faster than 250 MPH, up to 83 percent of the energy used goes toward fighting aerodynamic resistance.

But with a (highly theoretical) top speed of 1,800 MPH, super-maglev would blow the doors off of Musk's 300 MPH trains. That's because the train inside the Evacuated Tube Transport loop only encounters one tenth of the air resistance of the outside environment.

Dr. Deng Zigang, who led the project, envisions applications beyond land-based transportation. He proposes similar vacuum tube technology could be used to launch vehicles into outer space, or enable super high speeds for military weapons.

Of course, this is all pie-in-the-sky imagination talk right now—Dr. Zigang's test vehicle, running inside a 20-foot diameter vacuum loop, tops out at a very pedestrian 30 MPH. But as research continues at the university's high-temperature superconducting maglev ring, Dr. Zigang and his team hope to push that top speed way, way higher.

It sounds like, theoretically at least, the race is on.

http://phys.org/news/2014-05-enclosed-tube-maglev-capable-mph.html

So tell me why the US is just sitting around not pursuing this tech? :huh:
 
Popcorn Time for Android: Stream Movie Torrents on Your Phone for Free

bvtjujs1i5xkv3t9jacd.png


You remember Popcorn Time, the Netflix for torrents that suffered a self-inflicted death? Well, it never really died. The open source project lives on in the form a forked app version, available for download for Mac, Windows, and Linux. Today, it comes to Android.

The app is a faithful reproduction of the original streaming website: Pick from a curated set of recent titles or search the catalog, then after a brief buffering period, the app streams like it was any other streaming service, which of course, it's not. It's simply piecing together the torrent from peers and ensuring what's directly ahead is loaded. The main difference from the original service is that, you know, it's an open source app so it can't ever really be killed except by some kind of ISP interference with the BitTorrent protocol.

Technically speaking, this might not be legal, so use Popcorn Time at your own risk. Google didn't detect anything malicious in the build I installed, but there are some concerns the app's devs might be up to no good. But Popcorn Time is also awesome, so maybe the risk is worth it.

I know NickNitro had a thread about this somewhere but I couldn't find it. So enjoy watching everything on your android! If they would get this working with Chromecast I would be in heaven
 
Moog Is Putting Braille On Its Synth So the Visually Impaired Can Jam

j1ylvpecf4tqvj1jf1ep.jpg


Moog just trotted out a new version of its popular Sub Phatty synth that's got a braille overlay to help the visually impaired. It's hard to believe it took the legendary manufacturer this long to get around to it, especially given that it's actually a pretty simple modification to the panel's design.

OK, so when you're jamming on synth, some people just feel it out. Fine. But look at all those damn knobs on the Sub Phatty. They make the bass monster endlessly versatile, but it also makes the thing a little confusing to set up—even if you can see. If you can't see, well, I imagine it's gotta be pretty challenging to play it. With braille, it'll be a whole lot easier.

It's pretty cool of Moog to offer the option, which you can purchase now for $900 at Sweetwater—the same price as the original.

http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/SubPhattyBRL

That is awesome
 
Burgers For Breakfast, Because Nothing Really Matters



http://www.burgerbusiness.com/?p=17652

Well on the bright side, sometimes when I get done spinning and partying in the wee morn I can grab a burger instead of the BK breakfast which is just horrid IMO

If it's really dead when I hit up A&W for breakfast I just ask them nicely if I could get burgers instead. It takes an extra five minutes or so but I usually order four or more so it's not a waste of time. Those mama burgers are delish.
 
McDonald's French Fries: Soon With Seasoning Packets and Instructions

wcl20bfvdzjl3qboceeo.jpg


Multinational corporate food stuffer McDonald's has decided to spice up your starch intake with a drizzle of seasoning. Soon, at your local St. Louis or northern California hamburger supply chain, you'll be able to get Zesty Ranch, Garlic Parmesan, or Spicy Buffalo flavor packets to mix onto your french fries. With instructions.

The Associated Press reports that the food chain, based on their success with their "Shake Shake" fries in Hong Kong in 2005, will debut "Shakin' Flavor Fries" in the two markets as a test.

Lisa McComb, a spokesperson for McDonald's, said,

"As with all tests, we aren't in a position to draw conclusions or make assumptions about the test since it is just beginning but we hope our customers in these two markets enjoy the new flavors."

euafgic8mkx9josfhcmh.jpg


Pour 'em. Sprinkle 'em. Close 'em. SHAKE 'em. Love 'em. Heart disease.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...D_FRIES?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

IMO the fries are just about the only good thing McDonalds has going for them, why you would want to add crappy flavors to them is anyone's guess
 
Nope Dr. Dre has always had cash flow, he got out the game for a minute then came back and got out again and in to the headphone biz. Seems to have worked out in his favor
 
The Army's New Helmet Design Comes with Built-In A/C

dpve9fmstnrntfu0ieua.jpg


It's starting to look like the soldiers of the future could almost fight in space. The Army's latest helmet concept, specifically designed for chemical-biological protection, includes a respirator that keeps the air clean and cool, like a mini air conditioner built right into the mask. It also looks very badass.

Well, to be more specific, it looks like a real-life Halo helmet (or a motorcycle helmet). It also looks like the Army really does have a bit of a thing for Halo, since the last helmet update we saw looked equally as inspired by the game.

But this new design is all about functionality. Respirators are awesome for helping soldiers avoid breathing poison gas, but they also tend to be bulky and heavy. The technology built into this helmet weighs less and uses less power. A hose connects a blower unit and battery to the mask, which keeps a steady stream of cool air on the soldiers face.

The Army is still perfecting this design. They'd like to build a helmet with a responsive respirator that's only on when it needs to be on, and presumably, the helmet should also feature the same functionality we've seen in previous concepts. That means a heads-up display with live targeting, GPS battle mapping, and incoming video. Because without all that, it would just a head bucket, wouldn't it?

http://www.army.mil/article/125327/Army_imagines_next_generation_protective_mask/

Some pretty cool features for our soldiers in the future
 
Virgin Galactic Might Not Technically Get You Into Space

bbmcp3mked5rua6sgasn.png


A new report about Virgin Galactic has taken a look at the small print in the customer contract that Virgin Galactic will give to those who choose to fly in the most ridiculous commercial aircraft ever—and it seems that they can't promise you'll make it into space.

Even if it had the FAA permission that it requires to fly you into space—which it doesn't currently—the small print explains that Virgin will get passengers to an elevation of "at least 50 miles." That's high! Very high! But it's also some 12 miles short of the widely accepted boundary between the Earth's atmosphere and outer space—known as the Karman Line—which lies at an altitude of 62 miles.

Indeed, Virgin claims it's using NASA's 50 mile definition—but that was used in the 1960's in order to define pilots of the rocket-powered X-15 aircraft as astronauts. In contrast, these days the World Air Sports Federation, the governing body for astronautical world records, only recognises people as having travelled in space if they pass the Karman Line.

Virgin is, you'll be pleased to hear, working towards reaching those higher altitudes, according to IB Times. But for now, you can't be certain that its Galactic service will get you into space proper.

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/virgin-galactic-may-not-bring-passengers-into-space-1448266

Well that settles it, I'm cancelling my flight
 
Should Your Driverless Car Kill You to Save Two Other People?

There's a train speeding down the tracks towards five innocent people who will never get away in time. You can save them by pulling a switch, but it'll kill another person on a different track. It's a thought experiment people have debated for ages, but it's about to become a real dilemma when we program robots to pull the switch, or not.

Popular Science explains how the classic hypothetical question becomes real:

A front tire blows, and your autonomous SUV swerves. But rather than veering left, into the opposing lane of traffic, the robotic vehicle steers right. Brakes engage, the system tries to correct itself, but there's too much momentum. Like a cornball stunt in a bad action movie, you are over the cliff, in free fall.

Your robot, the one you paid good money for, has chosen to kill you.
Maybe the robot itself didn't decide to kill you. Maybe its programmer did. Or the executive who decided on that company policy. Or the legislators who wrote the answer to that question into law. But someone, somewhere authorized a robot to act.

That's not the only possible situation either. As Patrick Lin asks in Wired, when faced with a choice of hitting one of two cars or people, what criteria should a driverless car use to pick its target? The future holds a whole bunch of complicated robo-ethics questions we're going to have to hammer out eventually, but in the meantime let's start with one:

Should a driverless car be authorized to kill you?

http://www.popsci.com/blog-network/...t-sacrifice-your-life-save-two?src=SOC&dom=fb

Interesting dilemma
 
FCC to Remove "Fast Lanes" From Net Neutrality Proposal

It appears that the major public backlash in response to the FCC's proposed net neutrality rules hasn't fallen on deaf ears. According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, Tom Wheeler will in fact be revising his proposal (you know, again) to ensure that companies can't "segregate Web traffic into fast and slow lanes."

The previous set of rules had come under fire for allowing broadband providers to strike deals with content providers (i.e. Netflix, HBO, etc.) to ensure speedier download times for their users. A provision that would make it all but impossible for smaller companies unable to pay off providers to succeed—in other words, bad news for pretty much everyone.

Now, though, Wheeler is attempting to appease these concerns with new language. As an FCC official told the Wall Street Journal:

In the new draft, Mr. Wheeler is sticking to the same basic approach but will include language that would make clear that the FCC will scrutinize the deals to make sure that the broadband providers don't unfairly put nonpaying companies' content at a disadvantage, according to an agency official.
What's more, the new draft will "invite comments" regarding broadband's status as a public utility. The FCC has yet to classify it as such, but if it did, broadband internet would fall into the same category as landlines, subjecting it significantly stronger regulations.

Whether or not the updated proposal actually does address the public's (entirely valid) concerns over internet fast lanes remains to be seen. But if the point regarding reclassifying broadband as a public utility proves to be true, at least we're sort of kind of finally moving in the right direction.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles...579556200630931292?cb=logged0.331249087350443

Well better than nothing I guess
 
At this point I'll take anything as progress.
 
The Military's Spending Millions to Build Robots with Morals

Imagine a future where autonomous robots make life or death decisions based not just on data, but a preprogrammed moral code. This is not the plot of a dystopian novel. It's the directive of a new Pentagon program that will scare your socks off.

Over the next five years, the Office of Naval Research is awarding $7.5 million in grant money for university researchers to build a robot that knows right from wrong. This sense of moral consequence could make autonomous systems operate more efficiently and, well, autonomously. And some people even think that machines could make better decisions than humans, since they could strictly follow the rules of engagement to the letter and calculate the outcome of multiple different scenarios.

It sort of makes sense when you think of it like that. "With drones, missile defines, autonomous vehicles, etc., the military is rapidly creating systems that will need to make moral decisions," AI researcher Steven Omohundro told Defense One. "Human lives and property rest on the outcomes of these decisions and so it is critical that they be made carefully and with full knowledge of the capabilities and limitations of the systems involved. The military has always had to define 'the rules of war' and this technology is likely to increase the stakes for that."

On the contrary, programming robots with a certain moral code assumes we can all agree on that certain moral code. Without digging too far into your college philosophy syllabus, it's easy to understand how this could be a pretty contentious task. And while computer processing power could come in handy, say, when better handling triage at a field hospital, it gets super tricky when you're pointing missiles at people.

"I do not think that they will end up with a moral or ethical robot," said Noel Sharkey, another AI expert, in response to the news. "For that we need to have moral agency. For that we need to understand others and know what it means to suffer. The robot may be installed with some rules of ethics but it won't really care. It will follow a human designer's idea of ethics."

The debate goes on and on. It's worth having, though, especially since we're depending more and more on machines. And research suggests that we already hold robots morally accountable for their actions. Why not program some morals into them? Maybe because maybe then they'd decide that the right thing to do is take control of the world away from weak humans. You've read Asimov. You know how this story ends.

http://cdn.defenseone.com/defenseon...ilitary-going-build-robots-have-morals/84325/

And Skynet jokes in 3..2..1..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,288
Messages
22,079,998
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"