The Viva Pinata Hype Thread (that's right, ANOTHER)

WhatsHisFace said:
Yeah, games like that never take off.

1. Monster Ranch series.
2. Pokemon franchise.
3. Tomagachi phenomenon.

Plus, it will bring in more girl gamers than Dead Rising, which is now in my possession.

The target audience???? Kids. Simple.


I dont care who looses faith in me. I don't exactly give a **** if you care about what I say. Im not a guy like some here who goes along with the trend because its the popular opinion around here. I say what I think, so deal or dont.
 
After all this, you're honestly trying to present yourself as the guy who doesn't go along with trends and what's "cool"?
lol.gif
 
Manny Calavera said:
After all this, you're honestly trying to present yourself as the guy who doesn't go along with trends and what's "cool"?
lol.gif

No, unlike YOU, who goes along with everyone else's opinions and don't seem to have any of your own . Everything you say has been said before many many many many many times by other people, and better usually.

Ninja Gaiden, KOTOR, Zelda, etc....is there ANY game you like that isn't a cliche ''hardcore gamer's favourite'' (TM)?

You're a cliche. The most cliche guy I have ever come across on any message board.

Now go play pokemon or something like that.
 
Or those games are actually fun, which is why people like them. Hahaha, wow, I can't even fully wrap my mind around the irony of being called a "cliche" by the 12 year old who honestly doesn't see what's wrong with playing games solely based on how much blood there is :o
 
Manny Calavera said:
Or those games are actually fun, which is why people like them. Hahaha, wow, I can't even fully wrap my mind around the irony of being called a "cliche" by the 12 year old who honestly doesn't see what's wrong with playing games solely based on how much blood there is :o

No, they AREN'T fun, stupid. You're wrong :o

You and the cliche brigade just need to be sheep.

I'm not saying this game will suck because it doesn't have blood, it's just a ****ty idea. Wow raising animals? **** me, how more next gen can games get??? :o
 
WhatsHisFace said:
You're saying that Ninja Gaiden, KOTOR and Zelda aren't fun?

Never played NG, not my type of game. Zelda is not interesting to me graphically or conceputally or in terms of storyline. KOTOR's combat system SUCKED :down

That's before we mention the generic Goldeneye thats held up as some kind of standard.
 
That's the thing--you're not a guy who goes along with the trend here. You're a guy who refuses to even touch something that's not rated "M". And, with all due respect, it's THAT kind of mentaility that has ruined games over the last 10 years, ever since gaming has gone really mainstream. And your refusal to accept that something isn't fun to you and NOT call it crap really hurts your case, especially since you don't play the games, so your opinion is flawed and completely unfounded. Just because a game doesn't make you have to go get hookers and blow **** up doesn't mean it's meant for kids. It's meant for people with an open mind.
 
Horrorfan said:
Never played NG, not my type of game. You fail. Zelda is not interesting to me graphically or conceputally or in terms of storyline. How about in adventure structure? It's still the standard for puzzles and dungeons. KOTOR's combat system SUCKED :down And it's story, dialogue, roleplaying and quality are still unmatched by basically everything.
....
 
Drakon said:
That's the thing--you're not a guy who goes along with the trend here. You're a guy who refuses to even touch something that's not rated "M". And, with all due respect, it's THAT kind of mentaility that has ruined games over the last 10 years, ever since gaming has gone really mainstream. And your refusal to accept that something isn't fun to you and NOT call it crap really hurts your case, especially since you don't play the games, so your opinion is flawed and completely unfounded. Just because a game doesn't make you have to go get hookers and blow **** up doesn't mean it's meant for kids. It's meant for people with an open mind.


Read. Im not touching it because it's a ****T IDEA. THE IDEA IS ****TY. RAISING ****ING ANNIMALS IS NOT WHAT I WANT TO PLAY IN A GAME.

Comprende?
 
You don't even raise animals in this game, my god, you don't even know what you're attacking anymore :o
 
Horrorfan said:
No, unlike YOU, who goes along with everyone else's opinions and don't seem to have any of your own . Everything you say has been said before many many many many many times by other people, and better usually.

Ninja Gaiden, KOTOR, Zelda, etc....is there ANY game you like that isn't a cliche ''hardcore gamer's favourite'' (TM)?

You're a cliche. The most cliche guy I have ever come across on any message board.

Now go play pokemon or something like that.

Are we talking about classic Ninja Gaiden, or XBOX?

KOTOR was great in a lot of aspects, but admittedly, most of it's charms are lost on casual gamers or non-franchise fans. The battle system wasn't bad, but I'm also a tabletop player, so I could appreciate it a lot more than the casual video gamer.

Zelda isn't bad at all. Sure, by now, it's become cliché, but there's a reason for that. Zelda is the original. The original sells. People want money, so they copy the original.
 
Manny Calavera said:
It's always refreshing to mingle with the intellectually inferior.
Jackass

1) Rare was a HUGE waste of money...despite turning a profit for each and every one of their games, something several Microsoft published games can't claim, nor can the Xbox platform itself. And don't even get me started on the fact that they appeal to a demographic that otherwise is largely untouched on the xbox360 platform. Yeah, what a waste.
I never said that in this thread. Yes I do think that Rare was a waste of money considering that they really didn't make anything that great for the original Xbox.

2) No one said anything about this game making sony "**** their pants". Do you honestly play games based on their ability to help you in your online video game arguments? That is, in all seriousness, the gayest thing I have ever heard.
I never said that at all, EVER!

3) Yeah, I mean, no one likes games like these, look at the piss poor sales and reviews of dog**** games like Sims and Animal Crossing for proof of that. Or proof that your opinions are essentially so unfounded as to be totally invalid. Either one.
I never said that either jackass.

4) It's clearly not cool with you. Any attempt at enjoying it is an obvious admission to (and, to anyone who has not yet read this entire thread, I'm not joking, he really is this dumb) being a "pedo", amongst other things. Face facts. You hate it because you think it makes you cool to say "omg kiddiez!1", like people who refused to touch a gamecube for fear of ruining their image (and, let's be honest, people like that likely don't have much to lose in that area), people who won't watch certain movies, read certain books, listen to certain music, etc. You've made it abundantly clear that you're not just here for trolling, but also to somehow look "cool" with your video games, so don't act indignant when no one takes you seriously.
You're damn right it doesn't look cool to me. As a matter in fact it looks really lame. An opinion that is shared among many others.

5) They could have gotten "much better" companies? Better than companies who consistently pump out commercial and critical success stories? Better than companies that were selling dirt cheap? OH, that's right, you suggested they buy Rockstar, right? Haha, yeah, because the Xbox line up wasn't already oversaturated with terrible titles aiming at that demographic. I get the feeling that there are people just like you running the business end of every failed company on the face of the earth in the past 20 years.
I never said that at all either. You are really stretching this.

6) No, they don't. I mean, first of all, we can eliminate quite a few games from that list instantly. Metal Gear Solid 4? Are you serious? It looks like MGS3, only in high def, it's not even a contender. I mean, I know you love it and all, and think that it's some great graphical masterpiece and all that, but yeah, it's not. And Final Fantasy?
lol.gif
Are you honestly comparing Viva to a pre-rendered cgi fest that doesn't even look half as good regardless? Seriously? You sure? Hahahaha, wow. Try a little harder to build your lists. For example, when making a list of "graphically superior games", try not to include games that "look like an overhyped soggy bag of ass". The only real contenders there are Gears of War and Halo 3, which only look better from a realism stand point. If you take into account that it's ****ing ******ed to compare a stylized visual to something trying to look perfectly real, and take into account that the stylized visuals just make it more interesting to look at, yeah, Viva Pinata beats them both. I mean, it's not even debatable, this is almost as bad as the time when you tried to say Japan was actually the biggest market past 1998
lol.gif
You are nothing but a pathetic Microsoft fanboy if you think that only Xbox 360 games look graphically better than Viva Pinata. The games I have mentioned all look better graphically than Viva Pinata. And I bet that others would agree with me on this.


As for why Rare can't make...
Banjo - They can, and will.
A good Perfect Dark - They did, it's just that idiots decided they'd hate it before it came out, and mostly didn't even bother playing it, judging it entirely on months old shots of an even older alpha build of the game, usually making that the basis of their ONLY judgments on the title.
Conker - They will.
KI3 - I'm sure they are.
Then why the hell haven't they said that they are or will. Why not do it right now. Those games are in much more demand than f**king Viva Pinata.

I mean, so far, the only complaints about this game have been either "I am 12 years old and thus believe myself to be too cool to have fun, despite the fact that I'm, you know, 12 years old" and "I wanted another game, so instead of being disappointed that I didn't get them, I'll be disappointed that I didn't get them and I'll trash this as well, despite the fact that this idea is ****ing ******ed." Seriously, I really don't have any problem with someone saying "this ain't my cup of tea", I didn't blow up on WHF or anything, but honestly, if you're going to dislike something, at least give a decent reason, don't pull that "I only play what my friends say is cool, sorry, my hands are tied :(" crap, and for god's sakes don't compare the games visuals to a game like N3, which, despite it's great gameplay, looks like a trashy xbox launch title.
The idea of this game is ******ed. PINATAS!!! What the f**k. I don't want to play a video game with pinatas. It just looks like a bad concept.
 
hippie_hunter said:
I never said that in this thread. Yes I do think that Rare was a waste of money considering that they really didn't make anything that great for the original Xbox.
Yeah, I was also responding to Horror Fan, which I thought was obvious, since I was responding to things he said and that you did not, but I guess not. As for Rare being a waste of money...why again? Oh, because they didn't make anything "great" for the Xbox...despite the games they put out not only turning a profit, but being largely well received, and again on 360. Again, what a waste, they should have bought Majesco :rolleyes:


I never said that at all, EVER!
I never said that either jackass.
I never said that at all either. You are really stretching this.
Yes, he did, those exact words as a matter of fact, hence I was talking to him, obviously. "Jackass".


You're damn right it doesn't look cool to me. As a matter in fact it looks really lame. An opinion that is shared among many others.
You know what other opinion is shared amongst many others? That EA's "street" games and "Def Jam" are really "dope". I really couldn't care less how popular one opinion is over another here. The fact is, this game is going to be fun, it is visually interesting, and it's a breath of fresh air from all the ****ty sci fi Halo wanna be shooters and ****ty "action adventure, with GUNS! And now featuring: BLOOD!" almost-games that are flooding the system just like they did the original. And yet, all people can do is tear it down before they even really look at it or know anything about it, which is made obvious by people in this thread attacking things that arern't even in te game. And why is that again? Oh yeah, it's not "cool" enough. Not enough Snoop Dogg and "gats" for it to ever be fun, right? Idiots like you are the reason the industry looks the way it does now :down



You are nothing but a pathetic Microsoft fanboy if you think that only Xbox 360 games look graphically better than Viva Pinata. The games I have mentioned all look better graphically than Viva Pinata. And I bet that others would agree with me on this.
Actually, I said that no games look better than Viva Pinata, only that those two come close, not because they're 360 games, but because they're the only games that come close. If those two happen to be 360 games and that gets your panties in a bunch, go ***** and moan to for pretty much only releasing crap and CG, not me. And no, none of the games you mentioned look better than Viva Pinata, hell, one of the games you mentioned (N3), despite me loving it, looks worse than quite a few games on the original Xbox, much less the graphical flagship of that systems successor. And would others agree with you? Yeah. Would they be agreeing with you because Halo and Gears look more "real" and they can't comprehend any other way to look at graphics besides how "real" they look, totally ignoring how visually interesting something may be? Yeah. Does that totally invalidate your argument? Yeah.



Then why the hell haven't they said that they are or will. Why not do it right now. Those games are in much more demand than f**king Viva Pinata.
Says....who? People like yourself who have had a hate ***** for Rare ever since they left Nintendo, because you believe they magically lost all their talent under the "dark" and "evil" leadership of Microsoft? People who are too "cool" for the types of games that Rare excells at anyways? The fact is, Viva Pinata appeals to a crowd that is largely untouched on this system while at the same time offering a lot of fun to anyone not so full of themselves that they'll give it a shot. Banjo does the same...but doesn't launch a huge money making fad for Microsoft. Jet Force Gemini is too niche. Perfect Dark and Kameo were already done. That leaves Killer Instinct, a game that is in a smaller genre that appeals to a crowd already WELL covered on the system. This is why you don't run companies and probably shouldn't in the near future.


The idea of this game is ******ed. PINATAS!!! What the f**k. I don't want to play a video game with pinatas. It just looks like a bad concept.
What's so ******ed about it? Would they be more acceptable with red bandannas and a gun in their sagging jeans? Maybe green MJOLNIR armor? The pinata's look visually interesting, it's something original that hasn't been done so much that it's become a bad game cliche like the above examples, and wouldn't put off anyone who would have played the game in the first place. The pinata's are fine, the only problems here are your poor reading abilities and your piss poor taste, though I guess that last one isn't that big a deal for you since judging by this thread you have other motivations besides "fun" for playing games.
 
hippie_hunter said:
You gotta be on something. Those are like some of the best games ever created!
Wow, how dumb could you possibly be?

Pay attention, I'm only going to explain this once.

I want you to go back, and read the entire post you quoted, including what I quoted. Read it again. Read until you understand what was going on.


I WAS SAYING "YES THAT IS WHAT HE IS SAYING", NOT SAYING "YES THAT IS WHAT I THINK"! Jesus :rolleyes:
 
Yeah this games looks like it's going to be good at what it does, it just doesn't seem like it's going to do anything I'm all that interested in. I could never get into the Sims or Animal Crossing or any of those types of games that this seems to be in a similar vein to.
 
Yeah, it's basically "Rare rips off Animal Crossing" from what I've read, if you tried it and didn't like, this has nothing for you but pretty visuals and more points for your gamer score.
 
Yeah, To bad because I really liked the visual style, oh well.
 
It's a shame they made this crap instead of Banjo-Threeie or a new Conker game :o
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,265
Messages
22,075,672
Members
45,875
Latest member
shanandrews
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"