Thundercrack85
Avenger
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2009
- Messages
- 21,668
- Reaction score
- 8
- Points
- 33
Wolverine actually traveled a fair bit. They just didn't emphasize it.
They did do some location work in Russia, and the climatic island scene was shot in Georgia.
It's easy to have a handle on things when you're just remaking your first X-men movie with a bigger budget.
What's his excuse for keeping the focus on Wolverine yet again? Especially when Cyke and Jean coulda' used more development to give her sacrifice at the end more emotional resonance.
They didn't have 'nuff money for that, too?
![]()
X2: X-men United, however, felt sweeping and big to me. Epic in scope. It's not just about locals for scope...it's drama, story and what's at stake.
X2: X-men United was based HEAVILY off of "God Loves, Man Kills" (actually my favorite X-book, as well). It was as faithful an adaptation as could be made in the context of the films, too. The took liberties, did away with the mind control machine, added Mastermind, brought in Deathstrike and included Magneto as another villain in the end (in the novel he only aided the X-men against Stryker)...
But Cyclops was a prisoner of Stryker's for the majority of the book....as well as Storm and Charles.
Singer, Harris, and Dougherty have said that they were going to expand Scott's role in the sequel, and that if the Phoenix saga was going to be used (and it was going to be, including the White Queen) Scott was going to take center stage...
This wasn't his film... He got screwed in the third picture because of sour grapes from Fox.
-R
Singer walked. Superman was more important to him than the Phoenix Saga.
Singer walked. Superman was more important to him than the Phoenix Saga.
If he had been allowed to do it-- we may not have had ever seen this film, and we may be on X4 or X5 by now...
-R
What do you mean, "you don't think so"?I don't think so
X3 - 2007
X4 - 2010
X5 - 2013
What do you mean, "you don't think so"?
You just proved my point right.
I said we'd be on a Bryan Singer X4 or X5 by now...and you then give the timeline that says, his X4 would have come out a year ago.... That means we'd be on X4 or X5 by now...
-R
X2 coulda' had an epic feel... You know, with the whole Dark Cerebro killing all the mutants in the world thing, but Singer didn't have the directing chops to pull it off. Same with Superman Returns. Thank god for Vaughn.
I understand Singer walked....and you can't really blame the man.
1. He dreamt of directing a Superman film his whole life...
2. He had already directed two great X-men films and gave the next director a lay-up with the end of the second film...too bad Ratner was rejected by the rim...
3. He offered to do BOTH film, but Fox said "no".
I don't understand the hate for Singer...the guy is extremely talented, even if he is a bit eccentric. He outlined what would have been a FAR superior X3, listen to the /Slashfilm interview with Dougherty... He's made some very great films in his career: Apt Pupil, X-men, Usual Suspects, X2: X-men United, Superman Returns, Valkarie... all very well made films. It was defintely more Fox's fault than Singer's for leaving his X3 behind. He offered to do it a year and a half later, allowing him to do both Superman Returns and a third X-men picture, but Fox said no. If he had been allowed to do it-- we may not have had ever seen this film, and we may be on X4 or X5 by now...
-R
I thought X2 had a great sense of scope. The film feels just as big as First Class does.
If he didn't leave, X3 would have been so much better.
Hell to the yeahDeviating a little from the subject, had Singer didn't leave the X-men franchise back then, I'm sure he would have completed one of the greatest superhero trilogies of all time, and I think my favorite.