Sequels Time for him to Retire...

sorry, didn't get the punchline...

 

I actually think it would be interesting for Spidey to die and have MJ be pregnant with a son who ends up having spider-powers himself, but that would just be stupid at this point in the franchise. Wait until the 6th and final film. I mean as different as it is from the comics, it would be completely original to have the main character die in a superhero movie.

 

No, it aint original anymore. Think of "Hero" and "The Matrix: Revolutions".

 

People. I say this as a long-time reg of these forums, but this person "Spideys Sister" is known to me from another forum, and if you think this thread is silly you ain't seen nothing yet.

Prepare yourselves for an onslaught of bubbleheaded non-thought, the likes of which you have not seen in many a moon. What's going on now in Spoilers will pale by comparison... As proof of what I say, I present the concept of this thread.

 

You are just very, very stupid aren't you?

What a moronic idea. I'd call it crap but it sullies the good name of crap.

 

Kirsten is that you?

 

Those aren't superhero movies. In the superhero genre we've never seen a franchise end where the hero dies instead of going off to save the day once again.

 

Seriously what's so wrong with that idea? If it's done right if could make for some compelling drama in the last film. Now if they decide to stop at 3 or 4 then no. But if they go all the way to 6 I think it would be a neat ending to such a long franchise.

 

OH BOY YEAH! <------

 

How can you dump Peter Parker? It's not just Super Powers that make a superhero you know. PP is the best comic book alter ego of all time.

 

Uh-uh.

 

Well, for me; i wouldn't really consider 6 films a "long franchise"....certainly not compared to James Bond or Star Trek. I personally feel that there's still a plethora of characters (both good & villainous) and storylines worth adapting, that could easily keep the sequels fresh and interesting beyond 6 films...

I wouldn't mind an animated Spider-Girl movie though. Kind of what Marvel and LGF are doing with Avengers this February...

 

This is the point I've been arguing for a while; what makes a superhero-any superhero-intriguing is the person behind the tights. The person, not the persona. The appeal of the Spider-Man movies is Peter Parker's personal struggles, not his costumed adventures. In that regard he is irreplaceable.
And I really don't think a Spider-Girl movie would sell, anyway.

 

Spider-Girl?........................................ *walks off to commit suicide*

 

That's extreme. But it is a bad idea.

 

And how much of a fan can you be if you suggest retiring/replacing the character after two movies?

 

lmfao x4

 

Kill this thread.

 

Or not. And while we're at it we can bring Jean Paul Valley into the Batman movies. Let's forget about what makes superheroes interesting & REPLACE THEM ALL!!!!

 

that movie would suck, spider-girl takes place in a completely alternate reality, meaning that norman osborn would never have poisoned MJ's food, meaning she would have given a successful birth, which would destroy all of the ensuing sub-plots between the newly reincarnated gg and pp. Why would you destroy a comic legend to get rid of tobey macguire? If you need to get rid of tobey, do it via the coming of riochette dusk and prodigy or w.e. his name was. Then have whoever was one of those guys take his place and tobey takes that one's place. Dont destroy the relationship between gg and spiderman. This franchise hasnt even gotten to a 10th of its potenetial. I think that the producers/actors/writers/directors are viewing each marvel movie as an individual story, whereas they are in fact small events within the greater marvel universe. I think that with the next movies, we should begin to see the marvel universe taking shape because we now have several heros established:
spiderman
x-men
daredevil
fantastic four
the punisher
ghost rider (2007)
blade
and even a tentative iron man movie which may be made

all of these characters should begin to interact, further making the stories more intricate and diverse...therefore in terms of spider-girl, im answering with a qualified no, that should never occur.

 

Daughter? What daughter? Did you make Spider-Man 3 and I havent seen it yet?

 

you dont know the comic backstory very well do you?

 

Now, whiles I agree with everyone else, the threadmaker's opinion is quite ridicuous, yours appears to be equally non-sensical.

First you seem to confuse Spider-Man comic history with Spider-Man movie history. I highly doubt any instances of food poisoning, pregnancy, and even GG's reincarnation will ever happen on film. Not to mention, if a Spider-Girl film was made, it could, and probably would be, set in a completely different movie "universe."

Secondly, when you speak of Marvel merging it's movie franchises together - with crossovers or whatever - it's simply impossible for the foreseeable future; Marvel's many film properties are owned by various different production studios. Studios who I highly doubt would even consider jointly produced films to be made - or any form of crossover.

For now, Spider-Man is in a completely different universe than X-Men and Punisher, etc. The only crossover you could ever hope for is probably an X-Men/FF thing...but I'd doubt that'll happen either.

 

Maybe I should have added some Smilies so you guys wont get a wrong idea....